| Literature DB >> 35458095 |
Hongkang Zhu1, Ruoyong Wang2, Hanyi Hua1, Yuliang Cheng1, Yahui Guo1, He Qian1, Peng Du2.
Abstract
Maca compounds prescription (MCP) is a common botanical used in dietary supplements, primarily to treat exercise-induced fatigue. The aim of this study is to elucidate the multi-target mechanism of MCP on fatigue management via network pharmacology and gut microbiota analysis. Databases and literature were used to screen the chemical compounds and targets of MCP. Subsequently, 120 active ingredients and 116 fatigue-related targets played a cooperative role in managing fatigue, where several intestine-specific targets indicated the anti-fatigue mechanism of MCP might be closely related to its prebiotics of intestinal bacteria. Thus, forced swimming tests (FSTs) were carried and mice fecal samples were collected and analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. Gut microbiota were beneficially regulated in the MCP-treated group in phylum, genus and OTU levels, respectively, and that with a critical correlation included Lactobacillus and Candidatus Planktophila. The results systematically reveal that MCP acts against fatigue on multi-targets with different ingredients and reshapes the gut microbial ecosystem.Entities:
Keywords: fatigue; gut microbiota; maca; network pharmacology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35458095 PMCID: PMC9026883 DOI: 10.3390/nu14081533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Major bioactive components in the MCP.
| Major Bioactive Components | Contents |
|---|---|
| Total polysaccharides (mg/mL) | 34.78 |
| Reducing sugar (mg/mL) | 8.64 |
| Total proteins (mg/mL) | 0.812 |
| Total amino acids (mg/mL) | 1845.27 |
| Total fatty acids (μg/mL) | 110.59 |
| Total flavonoids (mg/mL) | 0.157 |
The composition of amino acids and fatty acids in the MCP.
| Amino Acids | Ret. Time (min) | Peak Area (mAU`S) | Contents (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Asp | 3.123 | 267.597 | 3.486 |
| Glu | 3.377 | 133.185 | 4.081 | |
| Ser | 6.403 | 3.658 | 2.706 | |
| His | 7.342 | 82.776 | 5.315 | |
| Gly | 8.303 | 51.938 | 1.955 | |
| Thr | 8.614 | 267.514 | 3.230 | |
| Arg | 9.943 | 3420.104 | 4.611 | |
| Ala | 10.820 | 144.076 | 2.256 | |
| Tau | 11.503 | 466.864 | 3.310 | |
| Tyr | 13.076 | 26.769 | 5.064 | |
| Cys | 16.360 | 6.677 | 4.948 | |
| Val | 17.056 | 34.216 | 3.037 | |
| Met | 17.50 | 11.686 | 3.760 | |
| Trp | 19.216 | 19.450 | 6.350 | |
| Phe | 20.175 | 36.052 | 4.441 | |
| Ile | 20.552 | 46.827 | 3.363 | |
| Leu | 21.916 | 53.758 | 3.335 | |
| Lys | 22.752 | 211.235 | 2.224 | |
| Pro | 29.295 | 8255.328 | 2.010 | |
|
| C12:0 | 9.527 | 828 | 0.769 |
| C14:0 | 12.044 | 3292 | 3.059 | |
| C15:0 | 13.447 | 92632 | 86.08 | |
| C16:0 | 15.051 | 6117 | 5.685 | |
| C18:0 | 19.091 | 4742 | 4.407 |
Figure 1Liquid chromatogram of the free amino acids (A) and gas chromatogram analysis of free fatty acid composition (B) in the MCP.
Figure 2The single herb-active ingredients–target network. The center blue circle represents 8 single herbs, the orange circle represents the active ingredients in the MCP, and the green circle represents the targets. The shades of color and the size of the nodes represent the degrees of active ingredients and targets, respectively.
Figure 3Action view of the interaction network obtained from STRING. (A) PPI network of 86 targets and 340 edges. (B) Venn diagram of anti-fatigue targets and intestine elevated genes. (C) The subnetworks of six targets: ABCG2, PDE9A, SLC6A4, CHRNA7, HNF4A and MAOA. (D) Immunohistochemistry staining of the 6 intestine-specific expression targets in normal and pathology tissues.
Figure 4Changes and differences in the gut microbiota. (A) Effect of the MCP on species richness and the abundance of gut microbiota; (B) phylum and genus level; (C) OTU level; and (D) the relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Candidatus Planktophila on the genus levels (red boxplots represent the Con group and the green represent the MCP group).
Figure 5Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment. (A) Biological process enrichment analysis for the effect of the MCP on fatigue. (B) Signal pathway enrichment analysis for the effect of the MCP on fatigue.