| Literature DB >> 35276824 |
Ali Boolani1,2, Karyn M Gallivan3, Kristin S Ondrak3, Courtney J Christopher4, Hector F Castro4,5, Shawn R Campagna4,5, Christopher M Taylor6, Meng Luo6, Scot E Dowd7, Matthew Lee Smith8,9, Lauri O Byerley3,10.
Abstract
Recent scientific evidence suggests that traits energy and fatigue are two unique unipolar moods with distinct mental and physical components. This exploratory study investigated the correlation between mental energy (ME), mental fatigue (MF), physical energy (PE), physical fatigue (PF), and the gut microbiome. The four moods were assessed by survey, and the gut microbiome and metabolome were determined from 16 S rRNA analysis and untargeted metabolomics analysis, respectively. Twenty subjects who were 31 ± 5 y, physically active, and not obese (26.4 ± 4.4 kg/m2) participated. Bacteroidetes (45%), the most prominent phyla, was only negatively correlated with PF. The second most predominant and butyrate-producing phyla, Firmicutes (43%), had members that correlated with each trait. However, the bacteria Anaerostipes was positively correlated with ME (0.048, p = 0.032) and negatively with MF (-0.532, p = 0.016) and PF (-0.448, p = 0.048), respectively. Diet influences the gut microbiota composition, and only one food group, processed meat, was correlated with the four moods-positively with MF (0.538, p = 0.014) and PF (0.513, p = 0.021) and negatively with ME (-0.790, p < 0.001) and PE (-0.478, p = 0.021). Only the Firmicutes genus Holdemania was correlated with processed meat (r = 0.488, p = 0.029). Distinct metabolic profiles were observed, yet these profiles were not significantly correlated with the traits. Study findings suggest that energy and fatigue are unique traits that could be defined by distinct bacterial communities not driven by diet. Larger studies are needed to confirm these exploratory findings.Entities:
Keywords: gut microbiome; gut microbiota; trait mental fatigue and energy; trait physical fatigue and energy
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35276824 PMCID: PMC8839554 DOI: 10.3390/nu14030466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Subject information.
| Variable | Median | Interquartile Range |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 31 | 7 |
| Sex (Males, Females) | 14, 6 | |
| Weight (lbs) | 180 | 54 |
| Height (inches) | 68 | 7 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.3 | 5.1 |
| Total Walking MET-min/week | 1402.5 | 2883.4 |
| Total Moderate MET-min/week total | 1560.0 | 3532.5 |
| Total Vigorous MET-min/week | 2880.0 | 2520.0 |
| Total Physical Activity MET-min/week | 7939.5 | 5711.6 |
| Sitting Total Minutes/week | 2220.0 | 1245.0 |
| Average Sitting Total Minutes/day | 317.1 | 177.9 |
| Trait Physical Energy | 8.0 | 3.0 |
| Trait Physical Fatigue | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Trait Mental Energy | 8.5 | 1 |
| Trait Mental Fatigue | 3.0 | 1.8 |
Correlation of trait measures with four alpha diversity measures.
| Alpha Diversity Measure | Trait Mental Energy | Trait Mental Fatigue | Trait Physical Energy | Trait Physical Fatigue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evenness | Correlation Coefficient | 0.099 | −0.401 | 0.092 | −0.387 |
| Significance | 0.679 | 0.079 | 0.700 | 0.092 | |
| Shannon | Correlation Coefficient | 0.293 | −0.330 | 0.199 | −0.432 |
| Significance | 0.211 | 0.156 | 0.401 | 0.057 | |
| Observed Otus | Correlation Coefficient | 0.432 | −0.185 | 0.331 | −0.390 |
| Significance | 0.057 | 0.435 | 0.154 | 0.089 | |
| Faith PD | Correlation Coefficient | 0.293 | −0.367 | 0.247 | −0.509 |
| Significance | 0.209 | 0.111 | 0.294 | 0.022 |
Bacteria taxa significantly correlated with specific traits. Same colored bacteria names correlate with more than one trait.
| Correlation Coefficient | Significance | |
|---|---|---|
| Trait Mental Energy | ||
| p__Actinobacteria | 0.469 | 0.037 |
| p__Firmicutes | 0.520 | 0.019 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Bacilli;o__Turicibacterales | 0.470 | 0.037 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Bacilli;o__Turicibacterales;f__Turicibacteraceae | 0.470 | 0.037 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Bacilli;o__Turicibacterales;f__Turicibacteraceae;g__Turicibacter | 0.470 | 0.037 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__;s__ | 0.461 | 0.041 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__[Ruminococcus];s__gnavus | 0.478 | 0.033 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Anaerostipes;s__ * | 0.480 | 0.032 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__;s__ | 0.454 | 0.044 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Coprococcus;s__catus | 0.479 | 0.032 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Roseburia;s__faecis | 0.558 | 0.011 |
| p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Verrucomicrobiae | 0.475 | 0.034 |
| p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Verrucomicrobiae;o__Verrucomicrobiales | 0.475 | 0.034 |
| p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Verrucomicrobiae;o__Verrucomicrobiales;f__Verrucomicrobiaceae | 0.475 | 0.034 |
| p__Verrucomicrobia;c__Verrucomicrobiae;o__Verrucomicrobiales;f__Verrucomicrobiaceae; | 0.475 | 0.034 |
| Trait Mental Fatigue | ||
| p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi | 0.451 | 0.046 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales | 0.451 | 0.046 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae | 0.451 | 0.046 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Anaerostipes;s__ | −0.532 | 0.016 |
| Trait Physical Energy | ||
| p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae;g__Holdemania | −0.533 | 0.015 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Dorea;s__ | −0.463 | 0.040 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Peptostreptococcaceae;g__;s__ | −0.461 | 0.041 |
| Trait Physical Fatigue | ||
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Christensenellaceae;g__;s__ | −0.630 | 0.003 |
| p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Anaerostipes;s__ | −0.448 | 0.048 |
| p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales | 0.445 | 0.049 |
| p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae | 0.445 | 0.049 |
| p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae;g__Haemophilus | 0.512 | 0.021 |
| p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__Bacteroidaceae;g__Bacteroides;s__ | −0.451 | 0.046 |
* Bacteria highlighted in red was found in more than one trait.
Predicted functional pathways significantly correlated with specific traits.
| Correlation Coefficient | Significance | |
|---|---|---|
| Trait Mental Energy | ||
| Cellular Processes; Cell Motility; Bacterial motility proteins | 0.494 | 0.027 |
| Genetic Information Processing; Replication and Repair; Non-homologous end-joining | 0.523 | 0.018 |
| Human Diseases; Infectious Diseases; African trypanosomiasis | 0.501 | 0.025 |
| Metabolism; Biosynthesis of Other Secondary Metabolites; Butirosin and neomycin biosynthesis | 0.445 | 0.049 |
| Metabolism; Biosynthesis of Other Secondary Metabolites; Flavonoid biosynthesis | 0.531 | 0.016 |
| Metabolism; Lipid Metabolism; Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 0.470 | 0.037 |
| Metabolism; Metabolism of Terpenoids and Polyketides | 0.450 | 0.046 |
| Metabolism; Metabolism of Terpenoids and Polyketides; Carotenoid biosynthesis | 0.621 | 0.003 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Benzoate degradation | 0.461 | 0.041 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Chloroalkane and chloroalkene degradation | 0.470 | 0.037 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Dioxin degradation | 0.464 | 0.039 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 | 0.446 | 0.049 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Naphthalene degradation | 0.451 | 0.046 |
| Metabolism; Xenobiotics Biodegradation and Metabolism; Xylene degradation | 0.453 | 0.045 |
| Organismal Systems; Digestive System; Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | 0.511 | 0.021 |
| Organismal Systems; Endocrine System; Insulin signaling pathway | 0.447 | 0.048 |
| Organismal Systems; Immune System; NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | 0.446 | 0.049 |
| Unclassified; Cellular Processes and Signaling; Electron transfer carriers | 0.484 | 0.031 |
| Unclassified; Metabolism; Lipid metabolism | 0.448 | 0.048 |
| Trait Physical Energy | ||
| Human Diseases; Infectious Diseases; Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells | −0.604 | 0.005 |
Correlation of traits with nutrients and food groups from 24 h recall.
| Trait Mental Energy | Trait Mental Fatigue | Trait Physical Energy | Trait Physical Fatigue | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folate, food (mcg) | Correlation | 0.465 * | 0.021 | 0.313 | 0.129 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.039 | 0.931 | 0.178 | 0.588 | |
| Lycopene (mcg) | Correlation | −0.399 | 0.505 | −0.438 | 0.503 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.081 | 0.023 | 0.053 | 0.024 | |
| Total dark green, red and orange, starchy, and other vegetables; excludes legumes (cup eq.) | Correlation | 0.500 | −0.018 | 0.221 | 0.036 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.025 | 0.940 | 0.350 | 0.880 | |
| Dark green vegetables (cup eq.) | P Correlation | 0.456 | 0.052 | 0.322 | 0.187 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.043 | 0.829 | 0.166 | 0.429 | |
| Grains defined as whole grains and which contain the entire grain kernel: bran, germ, and endosperm (oz. eq.) | Correlation | −0.609 | 0.383 | −0.442 | 0.466 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.004 | 0.095 | 0.051 | 0.038 | |
| Frankfurters, sausages, corned beef, and luncheon meat that are made from beef, pork, or poultry (oz. eq.) | Correlation | −0.790 | 0.538 * | −0.478 | 0.513 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | <0.0001 | 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.021 |
* numbers highlighted in red are significantly different.
Correlations between significant bacteria and significant nutrient/food groups.
| Bacteria (All Belong to Firmicutes Phylum) | Folate, Food (mcg) | Lycopene (mcg) | Total Dark Green, Red and Orange, Starchy, and Other Vegetables; Excludes Legumes (Cup Eq.) | Dark Green Vegetables (Cup Eq.) | Grains Defined as Whole Grains and Which Contain the Entire Grain Kernel: Bran, Germ, and Endosperm (Oz. Eq.) | Frankfurters, Sausages, Corned Beef, and Luncheon Meat That Are Made from Beef, Pork, or Poultry (Oz. Eq.) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Coprococcus;s__catus | Correlation | 0.429 | −0.354 | 0.391 | 0.491 * | 0.209 | −0.075 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.059 | 0.126 | 0.088 | 0.028 | 0.376 | 0.753 | |
| c__Erysipelotrichi | Correlation | −0.281 | 0.470 | −0.277 | −0.212 | 0.344 | 0.262 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.230 | 0.037 | 0.238 | 0.370 | 0.137 | 0.264 | |
| c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales | Correlation | −0.281 | 0.470 | −0.277 | −0.212 | 0.344 | 0.262 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.230 | 0.037 | 0.238 | 0.370 | 0.137 | 0.264 | |
| c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae | Correlation | −0.281 | 0.470 | −0.277 | −0.212 | 0.344 | 0.262 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.230 | 0.037 | 0.238 | 0.370 | 0.137 | 0.264 | |
| c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae;g__Holdemania | Correlation | −0.268 | 0.088 | −0.339 | −0.330 | 0.455 | 0.488 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.254 | 0.713 | 0.143 | 0.155 | 0.044 | 0.029 |
* Numbers highlighted in red are significantly different.
Figure 1A principal component analysis (PCA) for the 20 survey subjects. (A) clearly shows two distinct clusters: left blue and right red. (B) shows the average ± SD for each trait. MF, ME, PF, and PE were not significantly different between the two clusters.