| Literature DB >> 35457678 |
Alicja Frączek1, Marta Kasprowicz-Furmańczyk2, Waldemar Placek2, Agnieszka Owczarczyk-Saczonek2.
Abstract
Vitiligo is described as a dermatological condition characterized by pigmentation disorders in both the skin and mucous membranes. Clinically, this disease is characterized by the presence of well-defined white areas of various shapes and sizes, which are a manifestation of a reduced number of melanocytes. Due to the fact that vitiligo can be a significant cosmetic problem for patients, a number of methods are currently available to help fight for a better skin appearance. If all the available non-invasive procedures turn out to be ineffective, surgery can help, which is a very good alternative in the case of difficult-to-treat but stable changes. Both the development of new techniques and modifications to the already available treatment of cell and tissue transplantation give hope to numerous patients around the world. The effectiveness of a particular method is determined by its appropriate selection depending on the lesions undergoing therapy. Each form of surgical intervention has its advantages and disadvantages, which, along with the location or size of the treated hypopigmentation area, should be analyzed by a doctor and discussed with their patient. This article is an overview of the currently available methods of surgical treatment of vitiligo and a comparison of their pros and cons.Entities:
Keywords: cellular grafts; dermatosurgery; tissue grafts; vitiligo; vitiligo surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35457678 PMCID: PMC9031570 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Classification of surgical methods for the treatment of vitiligo.
| Tissue Grafts | Cellular Grafts |
|---|---|
| Mini-punch graft | Cultured melanocyte graft |
| Suction blister epidermal graft | Cultured epidermal graft |
| Split-thickness skin graft | Noncultured epidermal melanocyte suspension |
| Epidermal curettage technique | |
| Smash graft | Noncultured follicular root sheath suspension |
| Flip-top pigment grafting | |
| Hair follicle graft |
Figure 1(a) Induction of blisters on the forearm by the use of the suction blister-forming dish; (b) completed blister formation; (c) visible process of repigmentation occurring peripherally from the recipient site.
Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods.
| Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-punch graft |
Safe and simple technique for patients with stable vitiligo involving only small areas of skin up to 5% of surface area |
Infection Cobblestoning Graft displacement | Helalat et al., 2012 [ |
|
Insufficient evidence to allow a further recommendation of this method in the treatment of vitiligo | Eleftheriadou et al., 2021 [ | ||
|
Considered to be the easiest, fastest, and least expensive High rate of success Very few preventable or manageable side effects Motorized punches allow harvesting more grafts without exerting pressure |
Cobblestoning Variegated appearance Color mismatch Static graft Depigmentation of graft Perigraft halo Graft rejection Hypertrophic scars, Motorized MPG requires some degree of expertise compared Need for sterilization of reusable punches and replacement of motorized punch after every 2000 grafts | Chandrashekar et al., 2014 [ | |
| Suction blister epidermal graft |
Easy Cost-effective |
Requires surgical skill Milia formation might occur Pigmentation leading to cosmetic mismatch | Kar et al., 2018 [ |
|
Possibility to perform the treatment around delicate areas of the face Easy to use Cost-effective No need of additional equipment |
Possible bleeding Scarring Shifts in pigmentation Pain | Angeletti et al., 2019 [ | |
|
Low cost Absence of scarring Possibility of reusing the donor site No limitations of other tissue grafts (minigrafts, pinch grafts, or thin or ultrathin split-thickness grafts), which often lead to mismatch in texture and color |
Time-consuming Not suitable for large areas | Iwanowski et al., 2018 [ | |
| Split-thickness skin grafting |
Better cosmetic matching over larger areas using fewer grafts in comparison to MPG |
The possibility of contractures and graft rejection in certain sites, including dorsa of fingers and periungal area SSG requires greater skill than MPG Hypertrophic scarring at the recipient site | Khandapur et al., 2005 [ |
|
Effective Good cosmetic results |
Color mismatch Milia Infection Perigraft halo Hyperpigmentation of the donor site Slower onset of pigmentation and worse cosmetic outcome in comparision to AMT (autologous melanocyte transfer), although there is no statistically significant difference between STSG and AMT group Scarring Koebnerization Depigmentation | Chopra et al., 2020 [ | |
| Epidermal curettage technique |
Simple Cost-effective Can be performed outside the hospital setting using only basic instruments Promotes diffuse, more homogeneous, and faster repigmentation when compared with the PG technique Allows for the donor area to be reused | The author does not predict any particular disadvantages | Machado et al., 2014 [ |
|
Simple More cost-effective than epidermal cell suspension method |
Better color matching with surrounding skin and yield of graft in epidermal cell suspension method than in epidermal curettage; the difference was not statistically significant | Tyagi et al., 2021 [ | |
| Smash graft |
Effective and economic Does not require considering the side of the collected graft that is applied to the recipient side Does not need as much donor tissue as punch grafting or split-thickness grafting No sophisticated instruments are required |
Possible scarring Oozing Infections Delayed healing Hypopigmentation Time-consuming | Kar et al., 2018 [ |
| Flip-top pigment grafting |
Simplicity Lack of special equipment, minimal scarring Lack of a recipient site dressing |
A significant amount of skill is required It can only be performed over small areas Unsuitable for areas of thickened epidermis, such as the palms and soles | Mohammad et al., 2017 [ |
|
FTT is equally effective as PG for treating stable vitiligo In FTT, the graft uptake rate is higher Greater pigment spread, the cost of the procedure is lower than with PG |
Cobblestoning Hyperpigmentation Variegated appearance might be noticed | Sharma et al., 2013 [ | |
| Hair follicle graft |
Melanocyte and stem cell reservoir The color match is much more acceptable than that with other methods Minimal postoperative hyperpigmentation in the grafted sites Can be easily applied to a small area of vitiligo Can be performed in the eyelash area or at an angle of the mouth Safe Inexpensive No special equipment is required or a sophisticated operation theater Minimal complications |
Intraoperative bleeding Inclusion cyst Reactivation of vitiligo after 3–4 months of the procedure, respectively, however, correlation between the procedure and reactivation could not be conclusively established | Thakur et al., 2015 [ |
|
Simple to perform, minimal bleeding |
The repigmentation process may not be the most effective The risk of foreign body granuloma formation | Sardi et al., 2001 [ | |
| Cultured melanocyte graft |
Extensive vitiliginous areas can be treated by using a small donor skin effective Might be used for both children and adults |
Costly Time-consuming Requires a specialist, fully trained staff, and well-equipped tissue laboratories | Zokaei et al., 2019 [ |
|
Simple Effective Requires very little donor skin (usually only one-tenth of the recipient site) |
Infection Hyperpigmentation Koebnerization | Pandya et al., 2005 [ | |
| Cultured epidermal graft |
Large achromic areas can be treated in one session using cultured epidermal cells grown from a small biopsy No “cobblestone” appearance Excellent results can be obtained in focal and segmental vitiligo (repigmentation in 80 to 100% of cases) |
Temporary hyperpigmentation Long-lasting erythema Transformation of cells into a malignant clone Infections Bleeding Hypertrophic scars High cost of the therapy—the need for special laboratory equipment and the high cost of cell expansion and quality controls | Pianigiani et al., 2006 [ |
|
Allows the treatment of large hypopigmentation areas with the use of small biopsies No scarring Good color match Cause minimal discomfort to the patient |
The expense of epidermal cell culture. The skill required to grow cells in culture A number of supplies are required that are not commonly found in the dermatologist’s office | Plott et al.,1989 [ | |
| Noncultured melanocyte-keratinocyte suspension(noncultured epidermal cell suspension) |
Long-lasting repigmentation Very good color matching |
Incomplete color matching The possibility of scarring and changes in the skin’s texture Hypopigmented halo Erythema Infections | Bassiouny et al., 2018 [ |
|
Faster procedure for large areas and higher cell count in comparison to outer root sheath hair follicle suspension method |
Delayed healing Hyperpigmentation Scarring | El-Zawahry et al., 2017 [ | |
| Noncultured follicular root sheath suspension |
Relatively simple Tiny scars on scalp involves removal of much less volume of tissue in comparison to scalp biopsy (strip) Quicker healing process in comparison to conventional strip method Donor site dressing is not required after FUE Minimally invasive Good yield of melanocytes, melanocyte stem cells, and other stem cells Excellent pigmentation |
Requires high laboratory and manual skills | Gupta et al., 2013 [ |
|
Preparation of ORS cell suspension is technically less challenging than preparation of epidermal cell suspension |
No side effects were observed at the donor site Initial hyperpigmentation that subsequently faded to match normal skin color | Shah et al., 2016 [ |
The efficacy of available surgical methods.
| Method | Type of the Article | Number of Patients | Definition | Repigmentation | Follow up | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPG | Original article | 29 | Excellent repigmentation (>75%) | Postoperatively 58.6% of patients | 12 months | Helalat et al., 2012 [ |
| Original article | 10 | No definition in the article | 86.7% of sites repigmented with excellent cosmetic colour match | 6 months | Chandrashekar et al., 2014 [ | |
| Original article (an intrapatient comparative prospective interventional single-center open-label study) | 17 | Excellent repigmentation (>90%) | PRP/MPG/phototherapy: 0% of patients | 8 weeks | Salem et al., 2021 [ | |
| Clinical trial report (a comparative prospective study) | 20 | Excellent cosmetic matching: | Line 1: 47.4% of lesions | 3 months | Ragab et al., 2021 [ | |
| SBEG | Original article (prospective study conducted in patients who presented with angle of lip vitiligo) | 112 | Complete repigmentation: | 88.2% of patients | 3 months | Kar et al.,2018 [ |
| Original article | 10 | Complete repigmentation (>90%) | 0% of patients | 3 months | Iwanowski et al., 2018 [ | |
| STSG | Original article | 64 | Number of lesions showing excellent repigmentation (>75%) | Group 1 (MPG): | 3 months | Khandapur et al., 2005 [ |
| Original article (prospective single-center study) | 22 | Excellent repigmentation (≥75%) | Group A (STSG): 40% of patches | 6 months | Chopra et al., 2020 [ | |
| Epideraml curettage tachnique | Original article | 20 | Excellent repigmentation of lesions (>75%) | Group A (noncultured epidermal cell suspension): 0%,0%,8%,12% of lesions | 2 weeks | Tyagi et al., 2021 [ |
| Smash graft | No available data | |||||
| Flip-top pigment grafting | Original article | 20 | Excellent repigmentation (>90%) | PG: 0% of patients | 1 months | Sharma et al., 2013 [ |
| Hair follicle graft | Original article (a prospective study) | 50 | Excellent improvement of the lesions (75–100%) | 33.3% of lesions | 6 months | Thakur et al., 2015 [ |
| Cultured melanocyte graft | Original article | 27 | Excellent repigmentation (>90%) | Cultured melanocyte technique: 50% of patients | 6 months | Pandya et al., 2005 [ |
| Cultured epidermal graft | Original article | 93 | Complete repigmentation | 60% of patients | 3 months | Pianigiani et al., 2006 [ |
| Noncultured melanocyte-keratinocyte suspension | Original article | 20 | Excellent repigmentation of lesions (>75%) | Group A (noncultured epidermal cell suspension): 0%, 0%, 8%, 12% of lesions | 2 weeks | Tyagi et al., 2021 [ |
| Original article | 12 | Repigmentation > 90% | 33.3% of patients | 8 days | Gauthier et al., 1992 [ | |
| Original article (retrospective review) | 2283 | Long-term excellent repigmentation (>90%) of the skin lesions | 66% of patients—segmental vitiligo | 12–108 months | Zhang et al., 2021 [ | |
| Original article (prospective multicenter comparative study) | 37 | Cases with pigmentation ≥ 75% were considered responders | NCECS (noncultured epidermal cell suspension): 20% of patients * | 18 months | El-Zawahry et al., 2017 [ | |
| Original article (retrospective review) | 100 | Long-term excellent repigmenattion (>90%) | Segmental/focal vitiligo: 58% of patients | 12–72 months | Silpa-Archa et al., 2017 [ | |
| Original article (prospetive study) | 14 | Repigmentation ≥ 90% | 57.1% of patients | 5–15 months | Mohanty et al., 2011 [ | |
| Noncultured follicular root sheath suspension | Original article | 5 | Repigmentation > 90% | 60% of patients | 6 months | Vanscheidt et al., 2009 [ |