| Literature DB >> 34084006 |
Shashank Tyagi1, Suresh K Malhotra1, Tejinder Kaur1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Vitiligo is a common primary acquired pigmentary disorder due to loss of epidermal functioning melanocytes. Many surgical techniques have evolved over the years for its treatment and the need of a cost-effective modality has always been put forward. AIM: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of non-cultured epidermal cell suspension with that of epidermal curettage in repigmentation of stable vitiligo. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Epidermal cell suspension; Epidermal curettage is a simple and cost-effective surgical technique for achieving uniform pigmentation and suitable for beginners in dermatosurgery.; epidermal curettage; mupirocin ointment; stable vitiligo
Year: 2021 PMID: 34084006 PMCID: PMC8149990 DOI: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_190_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cutan Aesthet Surg ISSN: 0974-2077
Grades to assess degree of repigmentation
| Percentage of repigmentation | Grade | Repigmentation |
|---|---|---|
| No repigmentation | Grade 0 | Nil |
| <25% | Grade I | Poor |
| 26%–50% | Grade II | Fair |
| 51%–75% | Grade III | Good |
| >75% | Grade IV | Excellent |
Number of operated lesions according to anatomic sites in Group A and B
| Site of operation | Group A | Group B | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | Percentage | Number | Percentage | |
| Chin | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Left cheek | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 5.00 |
| Left elbow | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | 5.00 |
| Left foot | 6 | 30.00 | 4 | 20.00 |
| Left forearm | 2 | 10.00 | 4 | 20.00 |
| Left knee | 1 | 5.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Left leg | 2 | 10.00 | 2 | 10.00 |
| Left shoulder | 3 | 15.00 | 0 | 0.00 |
| Left side chest | 1 | 5.00 | 2 | 10.00 |
| Neck | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | 5.00 |
| Right cheek | 1 | 5.00 | 1 | 5.00 |
| Right leg | 1 | 5.00 | 4 | 20.00 |
| Total | 20 | 100.00 | 20 | 100.00 |
Figure 1A 28-year-old woman with vitiligo patch on left foot showing excellent pigmentation (92%) after treatment with NCES. (A) Preoperative. (B) After 2 weeks. (C) After 4 weeks. (D) After 8 weeks. (E) After 12 weeks
Figure 2A 18-year-old man with vitiligo patch on left cheek showing excellent pigmentation (100%) after treatment with EC. (A) Preoperative. (B) After 2 weeks. (C) After 4 weeks. (D) After 8 weeks. (E) After 12 weeks
Comparison of repigmentation in Group A after 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week of follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)
| WRS test comparative time group | Negative | Positive | Tie | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From 2 weeks to 4 weeks | 0 | 18 | 2 | -3.947 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 2 weeks to 8 weeks | 0 | 20 | 0 | -3.982 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 2 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 20 | 0 | -4.089 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 4 weeks to 8 weeks | 0 | 17 | 3 | -3.787 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 4 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 20 | 0 | -4.038 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 8 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 8 | 12 | -2.828 | 0.005 | Significant |
Comparison of repigmentation in Group B after 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week of follow-up (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)
| WRS test comparative time Group B | Negative | Positive | Tie | Significance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From 2 weeks to 4 weeks | 0 | 14 | 6 | -3.638 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 2 weeks to 8 weeks | 0 | 19 | 1 | -3.873 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 2 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 19 | 1 | -3.903 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 4 weeks to 8 weeks | 0 | 17 | 3 | -3.758 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 4 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 19 | 1 | -3.977 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
| From 8 weeks to 12 weeks | 0 | 12 | 8 | -3.357 | 0.001 | Highly significant |
Comparison of repigmentation in Group A and B after 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week of follow-up
| Follow-up | Grade of repigmentation | No. of lesions % | χ2 | Significance | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | Group B | |||||||
| No. | % | No. | % | |||||
| 2nd week | Grade 0 | 3 | 15 | 4 | 20 | 0.476 | 0.788 | Not significant |
| Grade I | 15 | 75 | 15 | 75 | ||||
| Grade II | 2 | 10 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Grade III | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Grade IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 4th week | Grade 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4.485 | 0.214 | Not significant |
| Grade I | 4 | 20 | 7 | 35 | ||||
| Grade II | 11 | 55 | 11 | 55 | ||||
| Grade III | 5 | 25 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Grade IV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| 8th week | Grade 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.783 | 0.426 | Not significant |
| Grade I | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | ||||
| Grade II | 5 | 25 | 6 | 30 | ||||
| Grade III | 7 | 35 | 7 | 35 | ||||
| Grade IV | 8 | 40 | 5 | 25 | ||||
| 12th week | Grade 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.667 | 0.644 | Not significant |
| Grade I | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| Grade II | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | ||||
| Grade III | 7 | 35 | 5 | 25 | ||||
| Grade IV | 12 | 60 | 12 | 60 | ||||
Figure 3Comparison of repigmentation in a 25-year-old man with vitiligo patch on both cheeks showing excellent pigmentation (100%) after treatment with NCES (A–E)
Figure 4Comparison of repigmentation in a 25-year-old man with vitiligo patch on both cheeks showing excellent pigmentation (90%) after treatment with EC (A–E)
Graph 1Graph showing repigmentation in Group A and B after 2nd, 4th, 8th, and 12th week of follow-up