| Literature DB >> 35456766 |
Angia Sriram Pradeep Ram1, Marie-Eve Mauduit2, Jonathan Colombet1, Fanny Perriere1, Antoine Thouvenot2, Télesphore Sime-Ngando1.
Abstract
In freshwater environments, limited data exist on the impact of mortality forces (viruses and heterotrophic nanoflagellates) on bacterial growth efficiency (BGE, index of bacterial carbon metabolism) compared to resource availability. An investigation to determine the relative influence of viral lysis and flagellate predation (top-down forces) on BGE was conducted in a mesotrophic freshwater system (Lake Goule, France) with time and space. Viral abundance was significantly (p < 0.001) related to bacterial abundance by a power law function with an exponent less than 1, emphasizing that the increases in host population (bacteria) together with viruses were not proportionate. A lytic viral strategy was evident throughout the study period, with high lysis of the bacterial population (up to 60%) supported by viral production rates. Viral processes (lysis and production) that were influenced by bacterial production and heterotrophic nanoflagellate abundance had a positive impact on BGE. Estimates of BGE were variable (9.9-45.5%) due to uncoupling between two metabolic parameters-namely bacterial production and respiration. The existence of a synergistic relationship between viruses and flagellates with bacteria in Lake Goule highlighted the decisive impact of top-down agents in sustaining the bacterial carbon metabolism of non-infected population through the nature of vital resources released via mortality processes.Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; bacterial growth efficiency; freshwater lake; heterotrophic nanoflagellates; lytic viral infection; viral production; viruses
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456766 PMCID: PMC9031129 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Hydrological and morphological characteristic of Lake Goule (France).
| Sampling location | 46°73′ N, 2°79′ E |
| Elevation (m) | 220 |
| Origin | Man made |
| Trophic status | Mesotrophic |
| pH | Alkaline (8.5) |
| Maximum depth (m) | 9 |
| Water circulation | Holomictic |
| Surface area (ha) | 123 |
| Storage volume (106 m3) | 3.8 |
| Watershed area (km2) | 35 |
| Catchment: lake area ratio | 28.5 |
Physico-chemical characteristics of Lake Goule at the studied depths.
| Parameters | Mean (Range) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Euphotic | Aphotic | ||
| Water temperature (°C) | 20.0 (8.6–28.2) | 18.1 (8.6–24.0) | NS |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg O2 L−1) | 9.6 (6.8–13.1) | 5.2 (0.5–12.1) | 0.02 |
| pH | 8.5 (7.8–9.2) | 8.2 (7.7–8.9) | NS |
| NH4-N (µmol L−1) | 7.1 (3.6–21.4) | 14.3 (3.6–35.7) | NS |
| NO3-N (µmol L−1) | 28.6 (14.2–100.0) | 28.6 (14.3–114.3) | NS |
| PO4-P (µmol L−1) | 0.7 (und–1.3) | 0.7 (und–1.3) | NS |
| Total organic carbon (µmol L−1) | 1041.6 (816.7–1216.7) | 1025.0 (808.3–1141.7) | NS |
| Dissolved organic carbon (µmol L−1) | 841.7 (775.0–916.7) | 825.0 (716.7–914.7) | NS |
| Total dissolved nitrogen (µmol L−1) | 121.4 (92.9–185.7) | 128.6 (100.0–207.1) | NS |
| DOC:DON ratio | 14.7 (11.1–17.8) | 16.7 (11.9–20.6) | NS |
| N:P ratio | 50.5 (19.6–113.5) | 45.9 (15.7–110.9) | NS |
| Chlorophyll | 12.0 (0.1–23.1) | 10.4 (0.2–18.8) | NS |
a n = 9 for each sampled layer. b Significance level of difference between euphotic and aphotic zone. und: under detection limits. NS denotes p values not significant.
Microbial characteristics of Lake Goule at the studied depths.
| Parameters | Mean (Range) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Euphotic | Aphotic | ||
| Viral abundance (107 mL−1) | 4.0 (2.0–6.2) | 3.4 (1.7–6.6) | NS |
| Bacterial abundance (106 cells mL−1) | 3.9 (1.5–7.8) | 3.2 (1.6–10.0) | NS |
| Virus to bacteria ratio | 11.5 (7.7–17.0) | 11.6 (5.1–21.9) | NS |
| Low nucleic acid bacteria (106 cells mL−1) | 3.1 (1.2–6.6) | 3.0 (1.3–11.3) | NS |
| High nucleic acid bacteria (106 cells mL−1) | 0.7 (0.3–2.3) | 0.6 (0.3–1.8) | NS |
| Bacterial production (µg C L−1 d−1) | 29.1 (10.6–50.5) | 16.7 (6.2–22.0) | 0.009 |
| Bacterial respiration (µg C L−1 d−1) | 67.8 (53.4–96.3) | 60.7 (33.3–91.4) | NS |
| Bacterial growth efficiency (%) | 30.2 (9.9–45.5) | 22.3 (9.7–36.3) | 0.05 |
| Frequency of infected cells (%) | 20.0 (11.1–31.5) | 10.5 (8.2–13.9) | 0.001 |
| Viral production (105 mL−1 h−1) | 17.4 (4.5–37.4) | 3.7 (1.1–9.0) | 0.001 |
| Burst size (virus cell−1) | 22.8 (5–71) | 14.6 (5–32) | 0.02 |
| Heterotrophic nanoflagellate abundance (103 cells mL−1) | 1.8 (1.1–3.2) | 1.1 (0.7–2.1) | 0.01 |
| Flagellate grazing potential (105 cells mL−1 d−1) | 2.9 (1.0–5.1) | 1.9 (0.5–8.0) | NS |
| Viral induced bacterial mortality (%) | 31.1 (13.7–60.2) | 13.1 (9.5–18.1) | 0.001 |
| Bacterivory potential (%) | 26.1 (8.4–75.2) | 22.0 (5.8–81.9) | NS |
| Viral induced bacterial mortality/grazing potential | 2.5 (0.2–7.1) | 1.2 (0.2–2.9) | 0.001 |
a n = 9 for each sampled layer. b Significance level of difference between euphotic and aphotic zone. NS denotes p values not significant.
Figure 1Time series variations in the abundance of viruses (VA; grey bars), bacteria (BA; blue bars) and their ratio (VBR; red dots; right y axis) at sampled depths in Lake Goule. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3).
Pearson correlation coefficient values among different environmental variables (n = 18).
| Temp | DOC | TN | Chl | BA | VA | HNF | BP | BR | BGE | FIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOC | |||||||||||
| TN | −0.81 *** | ||||||||||
| Chl | |||||||||||
| BA | −0.72 *** | 0.87 *** | |||||||||
| VA | −0.74 *** | 0.77 *** | −0.45 * | 0.87 *** | |||||||
| HNF | |||||||||||
| BP | 0.53 * | 0.60 ** | 0.50 * | 0.72 *** | |||||||
| BR | −0.64 ** | 0.59 ** | |||||||||
| BGE | 0.49 * | 0.56 ** | 0.59 ** | 0.50 * | 0.89 *** | −0.60 ** | |||||
| FIC | 0.51 * | 0.53 * | 0.72 *** | 0.88 *** | 0.78 *** | ||||||
| VP | 0.69 ** | 0.75 *** | 0.59 ** | 0.87 *** |
Temp: water temperature, DOC: dissolved organic carbon, TN: total nitrogen, Chl: chlorophyll concentration, BA: bacterial abundance, VA: viral abundance, HNF: heterotrophic nanoflagellate abundance, BP: bacterial production, BR: bacterial respiration, BGE: bacterial growth efficiency, FIC: frequency of viral infected bacterial cells, VP: viral production. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Time series variations in bacterial production (BP; light green bars), bacterial respiration (BR; dark green bars) and estimates of bacterial growth efficiency (BGE; blue dots; right y axis) at euphotic and aphotic zones in Lake Goule. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3).
Figure 3Time series variations in frequency of viral-infected bacterial cells (FIC) at euphotic and aphotic zones in Lake Goule. Data represent mean ± SE (n = 3).