| Literature DB >> 35456229 |
Hoang Mai Le1, Eric H Souied1, Safa Halouani1, Enrico Borrelli2, Thibaut Chapron3, Giuseppe Querques2, Alexandra Miere1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: to quantitatively analyze choriocapillaris perfusion using swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography (SS-OCTA) in eyes presenting with angioid streaks in comparison with control eyes.Entities:
Keywords: angioid streaks; choriocapillaris; optical coherence tomography-angiography; retina
Year: 2022 PMID: 35456229 PMCID: PMC9026537 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11082134
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Image processing methodology used for quantification of the choriocapillaris flow. En face choriocapillaris structure image (A) was transformed using the Fiji “Invert” function (B). Gaussian blur filter was then used for smoothing (C). The en face choriocapillaris flow image (D) was multiplied with the resulting en face choriocapillaris structure image (C) with the “Image Calculator” function. A compensated en face choriocapillaris image was created (E). The compensated en face choriocapillaris flow image was then binarized, to quantitatively measure the flow deficits as reported in the current literature (F). Analysis was performed within the four corners of the OCTA 6 × 6 mm images measuring each 1 × 1 mm. This analysis was performed in order to include comparable and equidistant regions outside of the area of choroidal neovascularization, when present.
Figure 2Quantitative analysis of the choriocapillaris and multimodal imaging of a 55 year-old patient presenting with angioid streaks. (A): Ultra-wide field color fundus photography revealing the presence of grey peripapillary jagged break lines. (B): Ultra-wide field autofluorescence fundus photography in the same patient showing hypo- and hyperautofluorescent break lines radiating from the optic disc. (C): Spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the same patient showing peripapillary atrophy. (D): Choriocapillaris en face flow image of the patient in panels A–C, as well as the resulting image after image processing using the Phansalkar local thresholding method with a window radius of four pixels (E) and eight pixels (F). Of note, the right panel shows the images of a 57-year-old healthy control choriocapillaris en face (G) flow image as well as the resulting image after image processing using the Phansalkar local thresholding method with a window radius of four pixels (H) and eight pixels (I).
Choriocapillaris quantitative study of the peripheral 1 × 1 mm squares applying the Phansalkar local thresholding method: comparisons between angioid streaks eyes and control eyes.
| Angioid Streaks Eyes | Control Eyes |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| R4 Mean percentage of flow deficits (FD%) | 47.62 ± 8.06 | 38.90 ± 6.38 | |
| R4 Mean total area of flow deficits (mm2) | 0.47 ± 0.08 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | |
| R4 Mean size of flow deficits (μ > m2) | 5312.99 ± 4489.96 | 2784.18 ± 6848.48 | |
| R4 Mean number of flow deficits | 202.45 ± 125.28 | 364.12 ± 125.28 | |
| R8 Mean percentage of flow deficits (FD%) | 48.37 ± 7.65 | 39.66 ± 6.51 | |
| R8 Mean total area of flow deficits (>mm2) | 0.48 ± 0.08 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | |
| R8 Mean size of flow deficits (μ > m2) | 5496.93 ± 4491.52 | 2758.13 ± 5953.73 | |
| R8 Mean number of flow deficits | 160.11 ± 130.83 | 317.88 ± 118.47 |
R4: window radius of four pixels. R8: window radius of eight pixels. *: Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative values are noted in mean ± standard deviation.
Choriocapillaris Quantitative Study of the Peripheral 1 × 1 mm squares applying the Phansalkar local thresholding method: comparisons between angioid streaks eyes and control eyes.
| Angioid Streaks Eyes | Control Eyes |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| R4 FD% in the superonasal quadrant | 48.38 ± 9.52 | 38.87 ± 6.48 | |
| R4 FD% in the inferonasal quadrant | 46.19 ± 9.52 | 40.43 ± 11.29 | |
| R4 FD% in the superotemporal quadrant | 48.38 ± 9.52 | 38.87 ± 6.48 | |
| R4 FD% in the inferotemporal quadrant | 47.87 ± 12.58 | 38.61 ± 6.86 | |
| R8 FD% in the superonasal quadrant | 49.04 ± 9.01 | 39.56 ± 6.35 | |
| R8 FD% in the inferonasal quadrant | 47.96 ± 8.96 | 41.21 ± 11.12 | |
| R8 FD% in the superotemporal quadrant | 49.04 ± 9.01 | 39.57 ± 6.34 | |
| R8 FD% in the inferotemporal quadrant | 48.62 ± 11.91 | 39.35 ± 6.61 |
FD%: Percentage of flow deficits. R4: window radius 4 of pixels. R8: window radius 8 of pixels. *: Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative values are noted in mean ± standard deviation.