| Literature DB >> 35454950 |
Wan Su Yun1, Ji-Ho Park2, Dong-Kwon Lim1, Cheol-Hee Ahn2, In-Cheol Sun3, Kwangmeyung Kim1,3.
Abstract
One of the promising cancer treatment methods is photothermal therapy (PTT), which has achieved good therapeutic efficiency through nanoparticle-based photoabsorbers. Because of the various functions of nanoparticles, such as targeting properties, high light-to-heat conversion, and photostability, nanoparticle-mediated PTT successfully induces photothermal damage in tumor tissues with minimal side effects on surrounding healthy tissues. The therapeutic efficacy of PTT originates from cell membrane disruption, protein denaturation, and DNA damage by light-induced heat, but these biological impacts only influence localized tumor areas. This conventional nanoparticle-mediated PTT still attracts attention as a novel cancer immunotherapy, because PTT causes immune responses against cancer. PTT-induced immunogenic cell death activates immune cells for systemic anti-cancer effect. Additionally, the excellent compatibility of PTT with other treatment methods (e.g., chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade therapy) reinforces the therapeutic efficacy of PTT as combined immunotherapy. In this review, we investigate various PTT agents of nanoparticles and compare their applications to reveal how nanoparticle-mediated PTT undergoes a transition from thermotherapy to immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; immunotherapy; photothermal therapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35454950 PMCID: PMC9029053 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14082044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Figure 1Schematic diagram of nanoparticles for photothermal therapy (PTT) according to the therapeutic mechanisms. Conventional PTT gives priority to the cell death (necrosis or apoptosis) of targeted cancer in the radiated area. In contrast, photothermal immunotherapy focuses on the immune reactions after PTT for systemic anti-cancer effect. (Abbreviations: PTT—photothermal therapy; ICG—indocyanine green; Ncs—naphthalocyanines; Por—porphyrin; CNT—carbon nanotubes; GO—graphene oxide; AuNP—gold nanoparticles; AuNSh—gold nanoshells; AuNSt—gold nanostars; AuNR—gold nanorods; Hsp—heat shock protein; HMGB1—high-mobility group box 1; ATP—adenosine triphosphate).
Figure 2(a) Scheme of HSA-ICG nanoparticles for enhanced tumor accumulation in 4T1 tumors by passive (EPR effect) and active (gp60 transcytosis pathway) targeting; (b) fluorescence imaging of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after the injection of free ICG (upper) and HSA-ICG nanoparticles (lower) at different time intervals; (c) photoacoustic imaging of the mice; (d) tumor growth curves after different treatments (* p < 0.05, a: partial irradiation, b: accurate irradiation, c: over irradiation); (e) thermal images of mice exposed to 808 nm laser for 5 min. Figures are reproduced from ref. [58] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 3(a) Schematic diagram of PLGA-ICG nanoparticles with R848 for photothermal immunotherapy against RM9-tumor models; (b) thermal images of mice after the subcutaneous injection, followed by laser irradiation; (c) flow cytometry displaying the population of natural killer cells after PTT; (d) increased population of natural killer cells after treatment (* p < 0.05, n = 3). Figures are reproduced from ref. [62] with permission from Dove Press.
Figure 4(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of IONP@PPy-PEG nanoparticles for 4T1 cancer treatment; (b) T2-weighted MR images of 4T1-bearing mice after intravenous injection of IONP@PPy-PEG (white circle: tumor sites); (c) photoacoustic images of tumor-bearing mice with IONP@PPy-PEG; (d) thermal images of mice with IONP@PPy-PEG after 808 nm laser irradiation; (e) growth curve of 4T1 tumors after treatment. Figures are reproduced from ref. [74] with permission from Wiley.
Figure 5(a) Schematic illustration of iron oxide nanoparticles for immunotherapy against 4T1 models; (b) thermal images of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice after laser irradiation; (c) change of dendritic cell maturation after the treatment; (d,e) tumor growth curves of the primary (d) and metastatic tumors (e). Figures are reproduced from ref. [83] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 6(a) Scheme of PTT agent with gold nanorods for SCC-7 tumor-specific imaging and therapy; (b) thermal images of tumor-bearing mice according to different laser irradiation times.; (c) histological analysis for tissue damage (right) and dark-field microscopic images of gold nanorods (below); (d) fluorescent tomographic images upon exposure to specific enzymes in cancer (1) and the inhibitor of the enzymes (2). Figures are reproduced from ref. [110] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 7(a) Thermal images of 4T1 tumor area after laser irradiation; (b) expression of CRT after treatments (**** p < 0.0001); (c) oxygen generation curves from the decomposition of H2O2 in the presence of the PTT agent AuNRs; (d) tumor growth curve of primary and distant tumor after treatments (BSA: bovine serum albumin, PD-1: immune checkpoint blockade). Figures are reproduced from ref. [116] with permission from Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Summary of nanoparticles for PTT.
| PTT Agent | Properties | Treatment | Laser | Tumor Model | Therapeutic | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (nm) | Absorption | |||||||
|
| ICG | 90 | 815 nm | 53 °C | 808 nm, | MCF-7 | Apoptosis | [ |
| ICG | 20~40 | 810 nm | 50 °C | 808 nm, | MCF-7 | Necrosis | [ | |
| ICG | 80 | 816 nm | 57 °C | 785 nm, | 4T1 | Necrosis | [ | |
| Naphthalocyanine | 40 | 785 nm | 47 °C | 785 nm, | A2780/AD | Apoptosis | [ | |
| Naphthalocyanine | 30 | 860 nm | 60 °C | 860 nm, | 4T1 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Porphyrin | 20 | 650–690 | 57 °C | 690 nm, | SKOV3 | Necrosis | [ | |
| ICG | 160 | 780 nm | 50 °C | 808 nm, | RM9 | Immune | [ | |
| ICG | 30 | broad | 47 °C | 808 nm, | Pan02 | Immune | [ | |
|
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | 20 | broad | 56 °C | 808 nm, | A549 | Apoptosis | [ |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | 10–310 | 480 nm | 57 °C | 808 nm, | MCF-7 | Apoptosis and necrosis | [ | |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | 100 | broad | 58 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Carbon nanotube, MW | 250 | broad | 67 °C | 808 nm, | Bel-7402 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Carbon nanotube, SW | - | borad | 55 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Carbon nanotube, SW | 390 | broad | 55 °C | 808 nm, | SCC-7 | Necrosis | [ | |
| Graphene oxide | 10~50 | broad | 50 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | 150 | 320 nm | <50 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | Immune respones | [ | |
| Iron oxide nanoparticle | 220 | 700 nm | 45 °C | 660 nm, | B16F10 | ICD | [ | |
| Carbon nanotube, MW | 200 | 480 nm | 46 °C | 808 nm, | B16 | ICD | [ | |
| Graphene oxide | 200 | broad | 53 °C | 808 nm, | CT26 | Immune response | [ | |
|
| Gold nanosphere | 40 | 530 nm | - | 514 nm, | HSC 313 | Photothermal ablation | [ |
| Gold nanoshell | 300 | 550 nm | 60 °C | 808 nm, | U-87 MG | Necrosis | [ | |
| Gold nanocage | 90 | 800 nm | 54 °C | 808 nm, | U87MGwtEGFR | Necrosis | [ | |
| Gold nanostar | 30 | 945 nm | 50 °C | 980 nm, | Sarcoma | Necrosis | [ | |
| Gold nanorod | - | 670 nm | 45 °C | 670 nm, | SCC-7 | Photothermal ablation | [ | |
| Gold nanosphere | 100 | 964 nm | 50 °C | 1064 nm, | 4T1 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanoshell | 40 | 808 nm | - | 808 nm, | B16-F10 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanocage | 60 | 800 nm | 45 °C | 808 nm, | CT26 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanocage | 90 | 740 nm | 50 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanostar | 120 | 850 nm | 52 °C | 808 nm, | U14 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanostar | 150 | 775 nm | <50 °C | 808 nm, | CT26 | ICD | [ | |
| Gold nanorod | 80 × 20 | 808 nm | 50 °C | 808 nm, | 4T1 | ICD | [ | |
Advantages and disadvantages of nanoparticle agents for PTT.
| Advantages | Disadvantages | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic dye |
Simultaneous imaging during PTT Excitation/Emission in NIR range Clearance from body Clinical applications (ICG) |
Low photostability Lack of hydrophilicity Low bioavailability | |
| Inorganic | nanoparticles |
Excellent photostability Easy synthesis with various sizes, and shapes Simple surface modification Enhanced tumor targeting Tunable optical property (gold NP) |
Lack of biodegradability Limited clinical applications Absence of standardization in using nanoparticles |