| Literature DB >> 35453268 |
Achiraya Siriphap1, Anong Kiddee1, Acharaporn Duangjai1,2, Atchariya Yosboonruang1, Grissana Pook-In1, Surasak Saokaew3,4,5, Orasa Sutheinkul6, Anchalee Rawangkan1,2,5.
Abstract
The spread of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Vibrio cholerae necessitates the development of novel prevention and treatment strategies. This study aims to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of green tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) against MDR V. cholerae. First, MIC and MBC values were evaluated by broth microdilution techniques against 45 V. cholerae strains. The checkerboard assay was then used to determine the synergistic effect of EGCG and tetracycline. The pharmaceutical mode of action of EGCG was clarified by time-killing kinetics and membrane disruption assay. Our results revealed that all of the 45 clinical isolates were susceptible to EGCG, with MIC and MBC values in the range of 62.5-250 µg/mL and 125-500 µg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, the combination of EGCG and tetracycline was greater than either treatment alone, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) of 0.009 and 0.018 in the O1 and O139 representative serotypes, respectively. Time-killing kinetics analysis suggested that EGCG had bactericidal activity for MDR V. cholerae after exposure to at least 62.5 µg/mL EGCG within 1 h. The mode of action of EGCG might be associated with membrane disrupting permeability, as confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. This is the first indication that EGCG is a viable anti-MDR V. cholerae treatment.Entities:
Keywords: EGCG; MDR; Vibrio cholerae; antimicrobial activity; green tea
Year: 2022 PMID: 35453268 PMCID: PMC9028445 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11040518
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
MIC and MBC of EGCG for a total of 45 drug resistant V. cholerae strains.
| No. | Strain | Serogroup/Serotype/Serovar | MIC (µg/mL) | MBC (µg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | N16961 | 125 | 250 | |
| 2 | P33 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 3 | P34 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 4 | P35 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 5 | P36 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 6 | P38 | 250 | 500 | |
| 7 | P39 | 125 | 250 | |
| 8 | P41 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 9 | P42 | 125 | 250 | |
| 10 | P43 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 11 | P44 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 12 | P45 | 125 | 250 | |
| 13 | P46 | 125 | 250 | |
| 14 | P47 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 15 | P48 | 125 | 250 | |
| 16 | 22115 | 125 | 250 | |
| 17 | 22116 | 125 | 250 | |
| 18 | 22118 | 125 | 250 | |
| 19 | 22125 | 125 | 250 | |
| 20 | 22126 | 125 | 250 | |
| 21 | 22127 | 125 | 250 | |
| 22 | 22135 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 23 | 22136 | 125 | 250 | |
| 24 | 22137 | 125 | 250 | |
| 25 | 22138 | 125 | 250 | |
| 26 | 22144 | 125 | 250 | |
| 27 | 4053022001 | 125 | 250 | |
| 28 | 4053023816 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 29 | 4053023817 | 125 | 250 | |
| 30 | 4053023818 | 125 | 250 | |
| 31 | 4053023822 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 32 | 4053023823 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 33 | 4053023826 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 34 | 4053023828 | 125 | 250 | |
| 35 | 4053023829 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 36 | 4053023830 | 125 | 250 | |
| 37 | 4053024283 | 125 | 250 | |
| 38 | 4053024290 | 125 | 250 | |
| 39 | 4053024292 | 125 | 250 | |
| 40 | 4053024293 | 125 | 250 | |
| 41 | 4053024294 | 62.5 | 125 | |
| 42 | 4053024295 | 125 | 250 | |
| 43 | 4053024296 | 125 | 250 | |
| 44 | 4053024297 | 125 | 250 | |
| 45 | 4053024299 | 125 | 250 |
Abbreviations: EGCG, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; MBC, minimum bactericidal concentration.
Synergistic effect of EGCG in combination with tetracycline against reference and V. cholerae MDR strains.
| Strain | MIC (µg/mL) of Extracts (a) | FIC (a) | MIC (µg/mL) of Tetracycline (b) | FIC (b) | FICI | Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alone | Combination | Alone | Combination | |||||
| P48 (O1) | 125.0 | 0.97 | 0.008 | 62.5 | 0.061 | 0.001 | 0.009 | Synergistic |
| 22136 (O139) | 125.0 | 0.97 | 0.008 | 0.78 | 0.008 | 0.01 | 0.018 | Synergistic |
| N16961 | 125.0 | 0.97 | 0.008 | 3.91 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.009 | Synergistic |
Abbreviations: EGCG, (−)-epigallocatechin gallate; FIC, fractional inhibitory concentration; FICI, fractional inhibitory concentration index; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration. FIC (a) = MIC of EGCG in the combination/MIC of EGCG alone; FIC (b) = MIC of tetracycline in the combination/MIC of tetracycline alone; FICI = FIC (a) + FIC (b). The values were interpreted as a synergistic effect for FICI ≤ 0.5.
Figure 1Effect of EGCG on the viability of V. cholerae. Time-kill kinetics of V. cholerae O1 (a), O139 (b) and reference strain (c) at concentrations of 0.25× to 4× MIC against V. cholerae were investigated over a 24 h incubation period at 37 °C. The MIC for EGCG were 125 µg/mL for all strains. MHB was used as the control instead of compound. Samples were taken at 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h, to determine viable bacterial numbers. The bactericidal level is indicated by the dashed lines. Significant differences compared to untreated controls at 1 h are indicated by asterisks: *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2Effect of EGCG on membrane permeability. V. cholerae N16961 was treated with EGCG at concentrations of 0.25× MIC to 4× MIC for 2 h at 37 °C. Intracellular leakage of nucleotides (a) and proteins (b) were measured, and 0.1% Triton X-100 (TX) was used as a positive control. The outer membrane disruption and membrane potential dissipation were investigated in terms of the Relative Fluorescence Intensity (RFI) percentages of NPN (c) and Rh123 (d). Significant differences compared to untreated controls are indicated by asterisks: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Effect of EGCG on bacterial cell morphology. V. cholerae N16961 was treated for 2 h at 37 °C with EGCG 0.5 mg/mL. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images at ×10,000 and ×20,000 magnifications were demonstrated: (a,b) are the controls, (c,d) are the effective treatments. The cell membrane disruption is represented by the arrow.