Literature DB >> 35449468

Challenges in the recovery of the genetic data from human remains found on the Western Balkan migration route.

Lucija Barbarić1, Ivana Horjan-Zanki2.   

Abstract

Traditional DNA-based identification of human remains relies on the system of matching STR profile of the deceased with the family references or antemortem samples. In forensic cases without any available samples for the comparison, the body remains unidentified. The aim of this study was to assess the applicability of massively parallel sequencing (MPS) approach in the forensic cases of five drowned individuals recovered on the Western Balkan migration route. Besides capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based genetic profiling (aSTR, Y STR, and mitochondrial control region sequencing) of postmortem samples, we applied ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit/Primer Mix B on MiSeqFGx platform and concomitant ForenSeq Universal Analysis (UAS) software. The assay showed high reproducibility and complete concordance with CE-based data except in locus DYF387S1. Allele and locus drop was evident in 2.9% of total SNPs that slightly reduced the completeness of the data. We endeavored to predict the phenotype of the tested samples and accurate biogeographical ancestry of European individual. UAS was less informative for the remaining samples assigned to Admixed American cluster. Nevertheless, the application of FROG-kb and Snipper tools along with admixture analysis in STRUCTURE and lineage markers revealed likely Middle Eastern and North African ancestry. We conclude that the combination of the phenotype and biogeographical ancestry predictions, including paternal and maternal genetic ancestry, represent a promising tool for humanitarian identification of dead migrants. Nevertheless, the data interpretation remains a challenging task.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogeographical origin; Human remains; Massively parallel sequencing; Migration route; Phenotype

Year:  2022        PMID: 35449468     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-022-02829-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  43 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A human genome diversity cell line panel.

Authors:  Howard M Cann; Claudia de Toma; Lucien Cazes; Marie-Fernande Legrand; Valerie Morel; Laurence Piouffre; Julia Bodmer; Walter F Bodmer; Batsheva Bonne-Tamir; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Zhu Chen; J Chu; Carlo Carcassi; Licinio Contu; Ruofu Du; Laurent Excoffier; G B Ferrara; Jonathan S Friedlaender; Helena Groot; David Gurwitz; Trefor Jenkins; Rene J Herrera; Xiaoyi Huang; Judith Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Andre Langaney; Alice A Lin; S Qasim Mehdi; Peter Parham; Alberto Piazza; Maria Pia Pistillo; Yaping Qian; Qunfang Shu; Jiujin Xu; S Zhu; James L Weber; Henry T Greely; Marcus W Feldman; Gilles Thomas; Jean Dausset; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evaluation of the Illumina(®) Beta Version ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit for use in genetic profiling.

Authors:  Jennifer D Churchill; Sarah E Schmedes; Jonathan L King; Bruce Budowle
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.882

Review 5.  Current and emerging tools for the recovery of genetic information from post mortem samples: New directions for disaster victim identification.

Authors:  J Watherston; D McNevin; M E Gahan; D Bruce; J Ward
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Case report: on the use of the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Ancestry Panel in a real forensic case.

Authors:  C Hollard; C Keyser; T Delabarde; A Gonzalez; C Vilela Lamego; V Zvénigorosky; B Ludes
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Maternal perspective of Croatian genetic diversity.

Authors:  Lucija Barbarić; Korana Lipovac; Viktorija Sukser; Sara Rožić; Marina Korolija; Bettina Zimmermann; Walther Parson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.882

8.  The challenge of predicting human pigmentation traits in degraded bone samples with the MPS-based HIrisPlex-S system.

Authors:  Magdalena Kukla-Bartoszek; Maria Szargut; Ewelina Pośpiech; Marta Diepenbroek; Grażyna Zielińska; Agata Jarosz; Danuta Piniewska-Róg; Joanna Arciszewska; Sandra Cytacka; Magdalena Spólnicka; Wojciech Branicki; Andrzej Ossowski
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.882

9.  Characterization of ancestry informative markers in the Tigray population of Ethiopia: A contribution to the identification process of dead migrants in the Mediterranean Sea.

Authors:  H R S Kumar; K Haddish; D Lacerenza; S Aneli; C Di Gaetano; G Tewelemedhin; R V Manukonda; N Futwi; V Alvarez-Iglesias; M de la Puente; M Fondevila; M V Lareu; C Phillips; C Robino
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.882

10.  Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories.

Authors:  Anne C Jäger; Michelle L Alvarez; Carey P Davis; Ernesto Guzmán; Yonmee Han; Lisa Way; Paulina Walichiewicz; David Silva; Nguyen Pham; Glorianna Caves; Jocelyne Bruand; Felix Schlesinger; Stephanie J K Pond; Joe Varlaro; Kathryn M Stephens; Cydne L Holt
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.