| Literature DB >> 35448997 |
Ziyu Guo1, Jihong Yang1, Guangping Yang2, Ting Feng1, Xinyue Zhang1, Yao Chen1, Ruizhi Feng3,4, Yun Qian5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nicotinamide (NAM) is an important antioxidant, which is closely related to female fertility, but its role has not been clearly elucidated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of NAM on follicular development at different stages and the quality of oocytes.Entities:
Keywords: Female infertility; Follicle size; Follicular fluid; Nicotinamide; Oocyte quality; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448997 PMCID: PMC9022236 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-00938-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 4.982
Fig. 1a NAM concentration in the follicular fluid at different stages of development. b Follicle size: The area under the ROC curve for NAM was 0.685, p = 0.0023. c Oocyte maturation rate: The area under the ROC curve for NAM was 0.610, p = 0.0099. d Normal fertilization rate: The area under the ROC curve for NAM was 0.611, p = 0.0093
Spearman correlation coefficients between NAM and clinical epidemiological information in large/small FF
| Parameters | Values | r | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.02 ± 0.52 | 0.092 | 0.542 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.74 ± 0.42 | 0.007 | 0.966 |
| AFC (n) | 16.87 ± 0.97 | − 0.150 | 0.321 |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 4.85 ± 0.47 | − 0.009 | 0.955 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 7.90 ± 0.44 | 0.152 | 0.320 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 3.66 ± 0.42 | 0.043 | 0.779 |
| Basal E2 (pg/ml) | 48.49 ± 3.06 | 0.052 | 0.733 |
| Gn duration (days) | 10.22 ± 0.23 | 0.291 | 0.050 |
| Gn dose (IU) | 2375 ± 64.72 | 0.230 | 0.125 |
| E2 on HCG day (pmol/L) | 4228.61 ± 240.12 | 0.012 | 0.937 |
| Progesterone on HCG day (nmol/L) | 1.12 ± 0.11 | 0.177 | 0.240 |
| LH on HCG day (IU/L) | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 0.012 | 0.938 |
| Oocytes retrieved (n) | 13.87 ± 054 | 0.043 | 0.776 |
| Mature oocytes (n) | 10.46 ± 0.63 | 0.108 | 0.474 |
| Oocyte maturation rate (%) | 77.58 ± 2.41 | 0.187 | 0.213 |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 73.60 ± 2.35 | 0.335 | 0.023* |
| Cleavage rate (%) | 99.69 ± 1.23 | 0.065 | 0.666 |
| High-quality embryo rate (%) | 31.70 ± 3.29 | −0.251 | 0.092 |
*Values are significantly different between groups (P < 0.05)
NAM nicotinamide, FF follicular fluid, BMI body mass index, AMH anti-Müllerian hormone, AFC antral follicle count; GnRH gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, HCG human chorionic gonadotrophin; oocyte maturation rate = number of oocytes at MII stage/total number of oocytes retrieved; fertilization rate = number of fertilized embryos/total number of oocytes retrieved
Correlation analysis between FF NAM and IVF cycle characteristics
| Parameters | Values | r | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAM (μg/L) | 51.52 ± 2.23 | ||
| Age (years) | 32.16 ± 0.40 | 0.028 | 0.698 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.54 ± 0.24 | − 0.077 | 0.295 |
| AFC (n) | 15.29 ± 0.52 | − 0.037 | 0.613 |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 4.64 ± 0.22 | − 0.052 | 0.475 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 9.13 ± 0.37 | − 0.021 | 0.776 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 3.24 ± 0.21 | − 0.012 | 0.873 |
| Basal E2 (pg/ml) | 48.36 ± 3.27 | 0.064 | 0.385 |
| Gn duration (days) | 10.75 ± 0.22 | − 0.056 | 0.445 |
| Gn dose (IU) | 2358.82 ± 58.14 | −0.059 | 0.417 |
| E2 on HCG day (pmol/L) | 3963.26 ± 271.00 | 0.082 | 0.264 |
| Progesterone on HCG day (nmol/L) | 1.04 ± 0.06 | 0.083 | 0.259 |
| LH on HCG day (IU/L) | 1.92 ± 0.20 | 0.042 | 0.570 |
| FSH on HCG day (IU/L) | 15.54 ± 0.32 | 0.038 | 0.608 |
| Oocytes retrieved (n) | 11.01 ± 0.62 | 0.065 | 0.372 |
| Mature oocytes (n) | 8.19 ± 0.49 | 0.121 | 0.095 |
| Oocyte maturation rate (%) | 74.59 ± 1.75 | 0.173 | 0.018* |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 74.30 ± 1.75 | 0.165 | 0.024* |
| Cleavage rate (%) | 95.44 ± 1.33 | 0.013 | 0.861 |
| High-quality embryo rate (%) | 49.75 ± 2.31 | −0.024 | 0.744 |
| Clinical pregnancy rate (%) | 49.18 ± 3.44 | 0.060 | 0.429 |
*Values are significantly different between groups (P < 0.05)
Clinical characteristics of patients by NAM concentration tertiles
| Parameters | Group1 | Group2 | Group3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAM (μg/L) | ||||
| Median | 33.61 | 43.88 | 59.38 | |
| Range | 8.57–38.78 | 38.8–49.29 | 49.39–251.15 | |
| Age (years) | 32.29 ± 0.74 | 32.52 ± 0.75 | 31.67 ± 0.59 | 0.674 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.35 ± 0.41 | 22.86 ± 0.39 | 22.41 ± 0.46 | 0.649 |
| AFC (n) | 15.32 ± 0.85 | 15.84 ± 1.05 | 14.71 ± 0.79 | 0.680 |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 4.76 ± 0.32 | 4.68 ± 0.43 | 4.46 ± 0.36 | 0.844 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 10.07 ± 0.78 | 8.23 ± 0.53 | 9.12 ± 0.55 | 0.120 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 3.11 ± 0.33 | 3.53 ± 0.42 | 3.07 ± 0.32 | 0.610 |
| Basal E2 (pg/ml) | 37.37 ± 2.40 | 65.29 ± 8.40 | 42.05 ± 3.42 | 0.001* |
| Gn duration (days) | 10.94 ± 0.42 | 10.75 ± 0.37 | 10.57 ± 0.34 | 0.793 |
| Gn dose (IU) | 2386.91 ± 102.02 | 2350.78 ± 100.21 | 2338.89 ± 101.41 | 0.941 |
| E2 on HCG day (pmol/L) | 3666.62 ± 393.25 | 4027.55 ± 582.21 | 4198.32 ± 407.98 | 0.719 |
| Progesterone on HCG day (nmol/L) | 1.05 ± 0.10 | 1.05 ± 0.14 | 1.02 ± 0.07 | 0.975 |
| LH on HCG day (IU/L) | 1.95 ± 0.34 | 1.81 ± 0.34 | 2.00 ± 0.38 | 0.923 |
| FSH on HCG day (IU/L) | 16.10 ± 0.68 | 15.09 ± 0.54 | 15.44 ± 0.42 | 0.425 |
| Oocytes retrieved (n) | 10.94 ± 1.16 | 10.33 ± 1.05 | 11.78 ± 1.00 | 0.633 |
| Mature oocytes (n) | 7.46 ± 0.85 | 8.33 ± 0.91 | 8.79 ± 0.76 | 0.527 |
| Oocyte maturation rate (%) | 67.90 ± 3.32 | 77.37 ± 2.99 | 78.56 ± 2.57 | 0.023* |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 67.84 ± 3.33 | 76.84 ± 2.99 | 78.28 ± 2.57 | 0.030* |
| Cleavage rate (%) | 92.82 ± 3.09 | 95.93 ± 2.28 | 97.61 ± 0.98 | 0.328 |
| High-quality embryo rate (%) | 49.06 ± 4.17 | 51.86 ± 4.27 | 48.31 ± 3.58 | 0.805 |
| Clinical pregnancy rate (%) | 47.84 ± 6.12 | 46.33 ± 6.03 | 53.19 ± 5.80 | 0.688 |
*Values are significantly different between groups (P < 0.05)
Fig. 2Effects of different concentrations of NAM on oocyte maturation and fertilization. The effect of NAM on cumulus expansion was observed using a light microscope (a). Percentages of oocytes matured (b) and fertilized (c) in vitro following treatment with NAM. d, f Representative images of mature and immature oocytes. Pronucleus formation in fertilized oocytes (e). PB: Polar body; GV: germinal vesicle. Values are significantly different between groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). Scale bar = 200 μm
Fig. 3Effects of different concentrations of H2O2 on maturation and fertilization. a Maturation rate of oocytes treated with different concentrations of H2O2 in vitro. b Fertilization rate of oocytes treated with different concentrations of H2O2 in vitro. The effects of NAM on the maturation rate of H2O2-exposed oocytes (c) and the fertilization rate (d). Values were significantly different between groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 4NAM treatment impacted ROS levels and spindle abnormality in oocytes damaged by oxidative stress during IVM. Fluorescence staining for ROS (a) and relative fluorescence intensity (c) of MII oocytes in each group (Scale bar = 200 μm). b Typical images of spindle morphology and chromosome arrangements in different groups. d Spindle deformity rate in each group (Scale bar = 5 μm). The asterisk indicates a statistical significance (P < 0.05)