| Literature DB >> 32703275 |
Jihong Yang1, Ting Feng1, Suying Li1, Xinyue Zhang1, Yun Qian2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the metabolic profiles in the follicular fluid (FF) samples from patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to analyze the correlations with follicular development.Entities:
Keywords: Follicle; Follicular development; Follicular fluid; Metabolic profiles
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32703275 PMCID: PMC7376676 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-020-00631-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
Clinical epidemiological information for participants who provided the FF sample
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| Age (year) | 29.50 ± 0.62 |
| BMI | 21.21 ± 0.38 |
| Percentage of infertility type (%) | |
| Primary infertility | 57.69 |
| Secondary infertility | 42.31 |
| Basal E2 (pg/ml) | 50.99 ± 4.48 |
| Basal LH (mIU/ml) | 4.51 ± 0.33 |
| Basal FSH (mIU/ml) | 8.24 ± 0.69 |
| AMH (ng/ml) | 4.18 ± 0.49 |
| AFC | 15.38 ± 1.01 |
| Gn dose (IU) | 2336.54 ± 107.90 |
| Gn duration (days) | 9.81 ± 0.36 |
| E2 level on the trigger day (pmol/L) | 4136.54 ± 353.29 |
| Progesterone level on the trigger day (nmol/L) | 0.98 ± 0.10 |
| LH level on the trigger day (IU/L) | 1.09 ± 0.12 |
| No. of oocytes retrieved | 13.27 ± 1.24 |
| Oocyte maturation rate (%) | 77.05 ± 3.35 |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 78.42 ± 3.02 |
| Cleavage rate (%) | 98.84 ± 2.30 |
| High-quality embryo rate (%) | 31.53 ± 4.83 |
| Biochemical pregnancy rate (%) | 65.33 ± 8.90 |
| Clinical pregnancy rate (%) | 53.33 ± 9.39 |
Data are presented as mean values and standard error
For one participant, oocyte maturation rate = number of oocytes at MII (metaphase II oocytes, 1st polar body) stage/ total number of oocytes retrieved
Fertilization rate = number of fertilized embryos/total number of oocytes retrieved
Cleavage rate = number of cleavage embryos/number of 2PN
High-quality embryo rate = number of high-quality embryos (grade I and II embryos)/number of 2PN
Biochemical pregnancy rate refers to the cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate in the oocyte cycle during which the samples were collected, that is, the number of biochemical pregnancies of the participant/the number of embryos transplanted in this cycle
Clinical pregnancy rate refers to the cumulative clinical pregnancy rate in the oocyte cycle during which the samples were collected, that is, the number of clinical pregnancies of the participant/the number of embryos transplanted in this cycle
Fig. 1Different sizes of follicles in one woman were selected. a Small follicles, with an average follicular diameter of 8–13 mm, corresponding to the FF volumes 0.3–1.0 ml. b Large follicles, with an average follicular diameter 17–22 mm, corresponding to the FF volumes 2.5–5 ml
Fig. 2Principal component analysis (PCA) plots and two-dimensional (2D) clustering plots describing the trend of separation between 26 independent samples between two groups. The Large and Small groups are represented by green and purple circles, respectively. The red circles are the QC samples. a The plots of PCA score in the ESI positive ion mode. b The plots of PCA score in the ESI negative ion mode. c OPLS-DA score plot demonstrating separation between the two groups in ESI positive and negative ion modes, based on the regression model. The OPLS-DA shows a prediction power (Q2) of 0.489 and a correlation index (R2Y) of 0.972, according to cross-validation. Samples from the Large group are indicated by red nodes; the samples from the Small group are indicated by green nodes. d Volcano plots presenting the statistical significance of metabolites in the FF samples in ESI positive and negative ion modes. e Change trends of 30 differential metabolites; the horizontal axis shows the VIP score of each substance. A VIP score is a measure that summarizes the contribution of a given variable to the regression model
LC-MS/MS detected metabolites that varied in FF with significant difference
| Metabolite | RT (min) | m/z | Type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LysoPE(0:0/24:6(6Z,9Z,12Z,15Z,18Z,21Z)) | 9.638 | 613.3383 | 0.049 | down |
| Gallopamil | 9.255 | 484.2938 | 0.026 | down |
| Tetrahydropentoxyline | 4.265 | 366.1415 | 0.047 | up |
| Thelephoric acid | 5.07 | 352.0188 | 0.039 | up |
| 7-methyl-hexadecanoic acid | 9.927 | 270.255 | 0.040 | down |
| Glutathione (GSH) | 1.589 | 307.0826 | 0.015 | up |
| 4-Carboxy-4-hydroxy-2-oxoadipate | 1.043 | 280.0444 | 0.002 | up |
| 16-Hydroxy hexadecanoic acid | 10.212 | 272.2331 | 0.041 | down |
| Thymidine | 4.311 | 242.0889 | 0.011 | up |
| 6-(Isopropylthio)purine | 7.79 | 240.067 | 0.002 | up |
| Acetone | 4.216 | 58.0418 | 0.049 | up |
| D-Lactic acid | 1.284 | 90.0322 | 0.0001 | down |
| 1,2,3-Tris(1-ethoxyethoxy)propane | 6.567 | 308.222 | 3.27E-03 | down |
| Fosinopril | 5.874 | 563.2989 | 3.40E-09 | down |
| Muzanzagenin | 8.594 | 442.2702 | 6.28E-07 | down |
| 3β,7α-Dihydroxy-5-cholestenoate | 8.692 | 454.3049 | 1.30E-07 | down |
| Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec | 5.902 | 621.3027 | 3.15E-08 | down |
| Spironolactone | 5.918 | 433.2275 | 6.36E-06 | down |
| Deoxycorticosterone (DOC) | 8.116 | 330.2213 | 1.34E-03 | down |
| 3-Buten-1-amine | 0.776 | 71.0736 | 5.33E-05 | up |
| Hypoxanthine | 1.698 | 136.039 | 6.86E-04 | up |
| (25R)-5beta-cholestane-3alpha,7alpha,12alpha,26-tetrol | 10.786 | 436.3543 | 4.33E-04 | up |
| 2,5-Dimethyl-1H-pyrrole | 0.956 | 95.0714 | 3.43E-04 | up |
| 5-Androstene-3,17-dione | 8.49 | 286.1953 | 6.36E-10 | up |
| 12,14-Pentacosadiynoic acid | 11.285 | 374.3223 | 5.70E-04 | up |
| N-(1-Deoxy-1-fructosyl)tyrosine | 0.969 | 360.1529 | 5.40E-07 | up |
| Dolichyl b-D-glucosyl phosphate | 4.878 | 488.2174 | 2.39E-04 | up |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | 8.559 | 288.2111 | 1.22E-04 | up |
| Monoethylglycylxylidide (MEGX) | 4.821 | 206.1432 | 3.76E-07 | up |
| 3-Hydroxylidocaine | 5.37 | 250.1696 | 6.60E-06 | up |
Type: Metabolites in small follicles were compared with those in large follicles, i.e., metabolites in large follicles were used as the control group
Fig. 3a Heatmap plot of upregulation and downregulation for 30 differential metabolites with VIP > 1 and P < 0.05 identified by LC-MS/MS. b Overview of pathway analysis based on altered metabolisms suggested by MetPA
Fig. 4a ROC curves of DOC in the FF for follicle size. b ROC curves of DHEA in the FF for follicle size. c ROC curves of the combination of the above two metabolites for follicle size
Pearson correlation coefficients between the statistical significance of metabolites and clinical epidemiological information in small/large FF samples
| Metabolites | Small/large FF |
|---|---|
| Thymidine | 0.576 (0.002) |
| Gallopamil | −0.589 (0.002) |
| 6-(Isopropylthio)purine | 0.502 (0.009) |
| 4-Carboxy-4-hydroxy-2-oxoadipate | − 0.572 (0.002) |
| Thymidine | 0.469 (0.016) |
| 1,2,3-Tris(1-ethoxyethoxy)propane | −0.400 (0.043) |
| Muzanzagenin | 0.588 (0.002) |
| Z-Arg-Arg-NHMec | 0.615 (0.001) |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | 0.405 (0.040) |
| Gallopamil | −0.506 (0.008) |
| Thymidine | 0.454 (0.020) |
| 4-Carboxy-4-hydroxy-2-oxoadipate | −0.444 (0.023) |
| 2,5-Dimethyl-1H-pyrrole | 0.423 (0.031) |
| Hypoxanthine | −0.494 (0.010) |
| Thelephoric acid | 0.464 (0.017) |
| Glutathione (GSH) | −0.470 (0.015) |
| Deoxycorticosterone (DOC) | −0.421 (0.032) |
| 3-Buten-1-amine | −0.394 (0.047) |
| Glutathione (GSH) | −0.474 (0.014) |
| Deoxycorticosterone (DOC) | −0.538 (0.005) |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | −0.502 (0.012) |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | −0.487 (0.016) |
In parentheses, the Pearson correlation p-value was illustrated if it is less than 0.05