| Literature DB >> 34521427 |
Chengcheng Liang1,2, Xiaole Zhang2, Cong Qi2, Hui Hu2, Qinhua Zhang3, Xiuxian Zhu4, Yonglun Fu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) refers to a decrease in the number and quality of oocytes in the ovary, which results in a lack of sex hormones and a decline of fertility in women. DOR can potentially progress to premature ovarian failure (POF), which has a negative impact on women's quality of life and is a major cause of female infertility. Oxidative stress is a major contributor to fertility decrease in DOR patients, affecting the follicular microenvironment, oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development. Understanding intracellular signal transduction can be achieved by defining specific oxidized lipid components in follicular fluid (FF) of DOR infertile patients.Entities:
Keywords: Diminished ovarian reserve; Follicular fluid; In vitro fertilization; Metabolomics; Oxylipins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34521427 PMCID: PMC8438979 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00825-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 5.211
The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with DOR and NOR
| Item | DOR group (n= 20) | NOR group (n= 20) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 35.350±4.017 | 30.350±3.514 | 0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.050±2.404 | 20.876±1.780 | 0.797 |
| Duration of infertility(year) | 4.350±3.014 | 2.900±1.586 | 0.211 |
| Type of infertility, n (%) | 0.342 | ||
| Primary | 9(45.00) | 11(55.00) | |
| Secondary | 12 (60.00) | 8(40.00) | |
| bFSH (mIU/ml) | 11.268±3.991 | 6.331±1.084 | 0.000 |
| bLH (mIU/ml) | 3.668±2.105 | 3.783±1.151 | 0.830 |
| bE2 (pg/ml) | 55.025±43.448 | 43.116±14.850 | 0.529 |
| P (ng/ml) | 0.512±0.249 | 0.569 ± 0.163 | 0.253 |
| bAFC (n) | 2.850±1.461 | 12.700±3.229 | 0.000 |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 0.709±0.344 | 3.900±1.189 | 0.000 |
| Oocytes retrieved (n) | 3.500±1.433 | 14.200±4.884 | 0.000 |
| MII oocytes (n) | 2.850±1.496 | 10.350±4.146 | 0.000 |
| Fertilizations (n) | 2.750±1.410 | 9.800±4.686 | 0.000 |
| High-quality embryos(n) | 0.750±0.786 | 2.650±2.777 | 0.012 |
DOR Diminished ovarian reserve, NOR Normal ovarian reserve, BMI Body mass index, bFSH basic follicle-stimulating hormone, bLH basic luteinizing hormone, bE basic estrogen, P Progesterone, bAFC basic antral follicle count, AMH Anti-Mullerian hormone
Fig. 1PCA score plots, OPLS-DA score plots, and corresponding validation plot of OPLS-DA results derived from FF metabolomics profiles comparing DOR and NOR. a. PCA score plot with QC samples. b. PCA score plot without the QC samples. c. OPLS-DA score plot. d. The OPLS-DA model’s permutation test
Differential metabolites in FF samples between DOR and NOR groups
| Metabolites | VIP | Fold change | Type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ±20-HDoHE | 1.46468 | 0.00481 | 0.68185 | Down |
| ±5-iso PGF2α-VI | 1.05784 | 0.01656 | 0.55571 | Down |
| 12S-HHTrE | 1.76019 | 0.00415 | 0.52086 | Down |
| 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 | 1.27131 | 0.03509 | 0.63420 | Down |
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGE2 | 2.48940 | 0.01361 | 0.28674 | Down |
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGF2α | 1.82901 | 0.02880 | 0.53937 | Down |
| 20-COOH-AA | 1.75008 | 0.00401 | 0.67958 | Down |
| 20-HETE | 1.11775 | 0.02031 | 0.29838 | Down |
| 8S,15S-DiHETE | 1.38584 | 0.00450 | 0.70519 | Down |
| PGA2 | 2.32409 | 0.01828 | 0.13424 | Down |
| PGD2 | 1.08593 | 0.04879 | 0.36052 | Down |
| PGE1 | 2.01038 | 0.00705 | 0.41340 | Down |
| PGF1α | 1.33950 | 0.04522 | 0.54329 | Down |
| PGF2α | 2.18401 | 0.01426 | 0.34922 | Down |
| PGJ2 | 1.66952 | 0.03160 | 0.24083 | Down |
FF follicular fluid, DOR diminished ovarian reserve, NOR normal ovarian reserve, VIP variable importance in the projection
Fig. 2Identification of the differential metabolomics profiles of FF between DOR and NOR patients based on a volcano plot and hierarchical clustering analysis. a. Volcano plot, down-regulated and up-regulated metabolites in DOR compared to NOR are marked in blue and red, respectively. The X-axis represents the log2 fold change of metabolites, while the Y-axis represents the fold change of the –log10 P value determined by the Student’s t-test. The variable importance in the projection (VIP) value is represented by the dot size. b. Heatmap of the hierarchical clustering analysis. There are fifteen distinct metabolites presented
Fig. 3a-o The violin diagram shows the concentration of 15 different metabolite profiles in the quantitative analysis of DOR and NOR groups. The y-axis represents integration data for mass spectral concentration. Each component group is represented by the x-axis. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P<0.001
Fig. 4KEGG’s metabolic pathway for arachidonic acid. The pink dots represent differentially expressed metabolites involved in the arachidonic acid metabolic pathway, all of which were reduced in DOR patients. KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; DOR, diminished ovarian reserve
The ROC reports between DOR and NOR group
| Metabolites | AUC | 95%CI | Cut-off | Sens | Spec | Sens+Spec |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ±20-HDoHE | 0.782 | 0.632-0.933 | 0.461 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 1.500 |
| ±5-iso PGF2α-VI | 0.740 | 0.579-0.901 | 0.171 | 0.900 | 0.650 | 1.550 |
| 12S-HHTrE | 0.762 | 0.612-0.913 | 0.138 | 0.800 | 0.650 | 1.450 |
| 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 | 0.667 | 0.492-0.843 | 0.045 | 0.600 | 0.850 | 1.450 |
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGE2 | 0.667 | 0.492-0.843 | 0.045 | 0.600 | 0.850 | 1.450 |
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGF2α | 0.680 | 0.512-0.848 | 0.372 | 0.650 | 0.650 | 1.300 |
| 20-COOH-AA | 0.758 | 0.606-0.909 | 0.469 | 0.900 | 0.550 | 1.450 |
| 20-HETE | 0.665 | 0.516-0.814 | 0.229 | 0.450 | 0.950 | 1.450 |
| 8S,15S-DiHETE | 0.800 | 0.655-0.945 | 0.060 | 0.900 | 0.650 | 1.550 |
| PGA2 | 0.850 | 0.729-0.971 | 0.232 | 0.800 | 0.800 | 1.600 |
| PGD2 | 0.657 | 0.498-0.817 | 0.045 | 0.550 | 0.800 | 1.350 |
| PGE1 | 0.818 | 0.687-0.948 | 0.170 | 0.800 | 0.700 | 1.500 |
| PGF1α | 0.644 | 0.470-0.818 | 0.057 | 0.750 | 0.500 | 1.250 |
| PGF2α | 0.735 | 0.576-0.894 | 0.660 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 1.450 |
| PGJ2 | 0.675 | 0.535-0.815 | 0.127 | 0.500 | 0.850 | 1.350 |
| Age | 0.805 | 0.661-0.949 | 33.50 | 0.950 | 0.650 | 1.600 |
| FSH | 0.957 | 0.902-1.000 | 7.545 | 0.900 | 0.900 | 1.800 |
| AMH | 1.000 | 1.000-1.000 | 1.820 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 2.000 |
| AFC | 1.000 | 1.000-1.000 | 7.500 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 2.000 |
ROC receiver operating characteristic, DOR diminished ovarian reserve, NOR normal ovarian reserve, AUC area under the curve, 95%CI 95% confidence interval, Sens Sensitivity, Spec Specificity, Sens+Spec sensitivity+specificity
Correlation analysis between the concentration of oxidized lipid metabolites and related parameters
| Metabolites(ng/ml) | R/ | AGE | FSH | AMH | AFC | OR | MII | FER | HQE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-HDoHE | R | -0.120 | -0.555** | 0.426** | 0.581** | 0.446** | 0.457** | 0.400* | 0.250 |
| 0.461 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.010 | 0.120 | ||
| ±5-iso PGF2α-VI | R | -0.175 | -0.455** | 0.361* | 0.508** | 0.361* | 0.341 | 0.273 | 0.103 |
| 0.286 | 0.004 | 0.024 | 0.001 | 0.024 | 0.052 | 0.093 | 0.531 | ||
| 12S-HHTrE | R | -0.101 | -0.303 | 0.365* | 0.252 | 0.347* | 0.385* | 0.361* | 0.002 |
| 0.535 | 0.057 | 0.021 | 0.117 | 0.028 | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.989 | ||
| 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 | R | 0.024 | -0.346* | 0.264 | 0.298 | 0.144 | 0.147 | 0.096 | -0.266 |
| 0.882 | 0.029 | 0.099 | 0.062 | 0.376 | 0.365 | 0.556 | 0.097 | ||
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGE2 | R | -0.147 | -0.347* | 0.547** | 0.425** | 0.463** | 0.495** | 0.497** | 0.151 |
| 0.367 | 0.028 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.351 | ||
| 1a,1b-dihomo PGF2α | R | 0.052 | -0.148 | 0.259 | 0.296 | 0.223 | 0.276 | 0.287 | 0.056 |
| 0.749 | 0.361 | 0.107 | 0.063 | 0.166 | 0.084 | 0.073 | 0.730 | ||
| 20-COOH-AA | R | -0.022 | -0.353* | 0.390* | 0.362* | 0.393* | 0.414** | 0.425** | 0.339* |
| 0.892 | 0.025 | 0.013 | 0.022 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.032 | ||
| 20-HETE | R | 0.191 | -0.386 | 0.327 | 0.447 | 0.510 | 0.436 | 0.412 | -0.220 |
| 0.494 | 0.156 | 0.234 | 0.095 | 0.052 | 0.104 | 0.128 | 0.431 | ||
| 8S,15S-DiHETE | R | -0.023 | -0.241 | 0.509** | 0.564** | 0.452** | 0.377* | 0.356* | 0.099 |
| 0.889 | 0.145 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.020 | 0.028 | 0.553 | ||
| PGA2 | R | -0.149 | -0.504** | 0.511** | 0.503** | 0.408* | 0.424* | 0.373* | -0.192 |
| 0.408 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.019 | 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.284 | ||
| PGD2 | R | -0.187 | -0.551* | 0.009 | 0.385 | 0.374 | 0.482* | 0.463* | -0.168 |
| 0.442 | 0.015 | 0.972 | 0.104 | 0.115 | 0.037 | 0.046 | 0.492 | ||
| PGE1 | R | -0.178 | -0.481** | 0.559** | 0.512** | 0.442** | 0.437** | 0.405* | -0.058 |
| 0.278 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.011 | 0.726 | ||
| PGF1α | R | -0.085 | -0.323 | 0.278 | 0.297 | 0.128 | 0.131 | 0.148 | -0.287 |
| 0.644 | 0.071 | 0.124 | 0.099 | 0.485 | 0.475 | 0.418 | 0.111 | ||
| PGF2α | R | -0.162 | -0.288 | 0.383* | 0.357* | 0.344* | 0.414** | 0.404* | -0.074 |
| 0.319 | 0.072 | 0.015 | 0.024 | 0.030 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.649 | ||
| PGJ2 | R | -0.100 | -0.330 | 0.071 | 0.339 | 0.014 | 0.196 | 0.025 | -0.422 |
| 0.745 | 0.271 | 0.817 | 0.257 | 0.964 | 0.520 | 0.936 | 0.151 |
P, P-value,**P<0.01,*P<0.05; AGE, age; FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; AMH, anti-Mullerian hormone; AFC, antral follicle count; OR, number of oocytes retrieved; MII, number of MII oocytes; FER, number of fertilizations, HQE, number of high-quality embryos