| Literature DB >> 35448743 |
Yang Yang1,2,3, Yunfeng Miao1,3, Shiwei Zhong1,3, Qiu Fang1,3, Yiguang Wang1,3, Bin Dong1,2,3, Hongbo Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
Osmanthus fragrans is an aromatic plant which is widely used in landscaping and garden greening in China. However, the process of flower opening is significantly affected by ambient temperature changes. Cell expansion in petals is the primary factor responsible for flower opening. Xyloglucan endoglycolase/hydrolase (XTH) is a cell-wall-loosening protein involved in cell expansion or cell-wall weakening. Through whole-genome analysis, 38 OfXTH genes were identified in O. fragrans which belong to the four main phylogenetic groups. The gene structure, chromosomal location, synteny relationship, and cis-acting elements prediction and expression patterns were analyzed on a genome-wide scale. The expression patterns showed that most OfXTHs were closely associated with the flower-opening period of O. fragrans. At the early flower-opening stage (S1 and S2), transcriptome and qRT-PCR analysis revealed the expression of OfXTH24, 27, 32, 35, and 36 significantly increased under low ambient temperature (19 °C). It is speculated that the five genes might be involved in the regulation of flower opening by responding to ambient temperature changes. Our results provide solid foundation for the functional analysis of OfXTH genes and help to explore the mechanism of flower opening responding to ambient temperature in O. fragrans.Entities:
Keywords: Osmanthus fragrans; ambient temperature; flower opening; xyloglucan endoglycolase/hydrolase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35448743 PMCID: PMC9031776 DOI: 10.3390/plants11081015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The characteristic of OfXTH genes in O. fragrans.
| Gene | Length | MW | PI | SP | Subcellular Localization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 298 | 34,863.67 | 4.83 | 28 | cell wall |
|
| 298 | 34,958.87 | 5.03 | 28 | cell wall |
|
| 298 | 33,595.75 | 5.57 | 29 | cell wall |
|
| 289 | 32,550.53 | 8.85 | 32 | cell wall |
|
| 305 | 34,591.01 | 6.51 | 26 | cell wall |
|
| 338 | 39,335.44 | 9.05 | — | cell wall |
|
| 255 | 29,221.92 | 9.43 | 20 | cell wall |
|
| 260 | 29,772.14 | 8.24 | — | cell wall |
|
| 355 | 40,429.32 | 8.84 | 20 | cell wall |
|
| 294 | 34,293.78 | 8.08 | 23 | cell wall |
|
| 294 | 34,213.84 | 8.84 | 25 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 293 | 33,385.14 | 5.74 | 21 | cell wall |
|
| 294 | 34,263.86 | 8.83 | 25 | cell wall |
|
| 297 | 33,314.48 | 5.21 | 17 | cell wall |
|
| 308 | 35,606.44 | 9.47 | 33 | cell wall |
|
| 324 | 37,516.58 | 9.03 | — | cell wall |
|
| 295 | 33,485.54 | 6.89 | 32 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 270 | 30,312.99 | 5.23 | 23 | cell wall |
|
| 324 | 37,516.58 | 9.03 | — | cell wall |
|
| 295 | 33,463.49 | 6.43 | 32 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 325 | 37,273.13 | 8.93 | 24 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 282 | 31,918.7 | 8.69 | — | cell wall |
|
| 234 | 26,856.03 | 8.79 | — | cell wall |
|
| 295 | 34,651.93 | 5.14 | 26 | cell wall |
|
| 321 | 37,347.8 | 8.96 | 26 | cell wall |
|
| 261 | 30,242.91 | 5.98 | — | cell wall |
|
| 250 | 28,403.93 | 9.1 | — | cell wall |
|
| 302 | 35,166.08 | 5.7 | 20 | cell wall |
|
| 295 | 33,937.19 | 6.75 | 18 | cell wall |
|
| 339 | 38,895.06 | 6.4 | 31 | cell wall |
|
| 298 | 34,746.73 | 5.02 | 28 | cell wall |
|
| 289 | 32,124.53 | 5.1 | 23 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 287 | 32,580.54 | 8.78 | 25 | cell wall |
|
| 298 | 33,611.81 | 5.57 | 29 | cell wall |
|
| 304 | 34,732.12 | 9.08 | — | cell wall |
|
| 288 | 32,847.03 | 9.22 | 21 | cell wall/cytoplasm |
|
| 293 | 33,556.83 | 6.31 | 30 | cell wall |
|
| 294 | 34,368.01 | 8.69 | 25 | cell wall |
Figure 1Phylogenetic analysis of XTH proteins from O. fragrans, A. thaliana, and O. sativa. Each subgroup is distinguished by a different color.
Figure 2Gene structure and motif distribution of OfXTH proteins. (A) Gene structure, putative signal peptide sequences, and conservative motif sequence. Each subgroup is distinguished by a different color. White boxes and black lines represent exons and introns, respectively. The green and red strips indicate putative signal peptide sequences and conservative motif sequence, respectively. (B) The motif distribution. Motifs 1–10 in the OfXTH proteins are represented by different colored boxes.
Figure 3Chromosomal distribution of OfXTH genes.
Figure 4Synteny analysis of 38 OfXTH genes in O. fragrans. Orange rectangles represent chromosomes of O. fragrans, and blue lines represent segment duplicate gene pairs.
Ka/Ks analysis and estimated divergence time of OfXTHs.
| Duplicated Gene Pairs | Ka | Ks | Ka/Ks | Type of | Divergence Time (Mya) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.118 | 0.987 | 0.119 | Purifying | 32.91 |
|
| 0.017 | 0.346 | 0.050 | Purifying | 11.55 |
|
| 0.023 | 0.355 | 0.065 | Purifying | 11.82 |
|
| 0.221 | 1.798 | 0.123 | Purifying | 59.93 |
|
| 0.083 | 0.394 | 0.212 | Purifying | 13.14 |
|
| 0.059 | 0.371 | 0.158 | Purifying | 12.36 |
|
| 0.121 | 0.666 | 0.181 | Purifying | 22.21 |
|
| 0.051 | 0.264 | 0.194 | Purifying | 8.82 |
|
| 0.262 | 0.568 | 0.461 | Purifying | 18.93 |
|
| 0.027 | 0.274 | 0.100 | Purifying | 9.13 |
|
| 0.003 | 0.011 | 0.267 | Purifying | 0.36 |
|
| 0.034 | 0.205 | 0.166 | Purifying | 6.84 |
|
| 0.130 | 0.806 | 0.161 | Purifying | 26.87 |
|
| 0.038 | 0.194 | 0.194 | Purifying | 6.48 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.000 | Purifying | 0.31 |
|
| 0.143 | 0.958 | 0.150 | Purifying | 31.92 |
|
| 0.123 | 1.094 | 0.112 | Purifying | 36.48 |
|
| 0.078 | 0.345 | 0.226 | Purifying | 11.49 |
|
| 0.171 | 0.526 | 0.326 | Purifying | 17.54 |
|
| 0.038 | 0.222 | 0.169 | Purifying | 7.40 |
Figure 5Prediction of cis-responsive elements in the OfXTH promoters. Different cis-responsive elements are represented by different colored boxes.
Figure 6Expression profiles of OfXTHs at different flowering stages. Significant differences are identified by SPSS (version 22) with Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) and are represented by different letters above the error bars. (A) OfXTH genes highly expressed in the S0 period. (B) OfXTH genes upregulated in the S1 and S2 period. (C) OfXTH genes upregulated in the S4 and S5 period.
DEGs of OfXTHs treated at 19 °C and 23 °C for 2 and 5 days.
| Gene | 2 d, 19 °C FPKM | 2 d, 23 °C FPKM | 5 d, 19 °C FPKM | 5 d, 23 °C FPKM | Log2 (Ratio of Abundance) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 d, 19 °C vs. 2 d, 23 °C | FDR | 5 d, 19 °C vs. 5 d, 23 °C | FDR | |||||
|
| 3.97 | 0.38 | 18.99 | 0.05 | 3.37 | 9.4 × 10−2 | 8.69 | 1.6 × 10−15 |
|
| 1.36 | 2.00 | 15.91 | 1.92 | −0.56 | 2.8 × 10−1 | 3.05 | 5.9 × 10−21 |
|
| 0.02 | 0.05 | 2.75 | 0.10 | −1.64 | 1.0 × 100 | 4.79 | 2.5 × 10−8 |
|
| 1.90 | 1.47 | 3.10 | 0.18 | 0.38 | 3.8 × 10−5 | 4.09 | 4.9 × 10−8 |
|
| 1.75 | 3.00 | 0.64 | 4.07 | −0.78 | 1.5 × 10−2 | −2.68 | 7.8 × 10−7 |
|
| 1.98 | 0.85 | 88.96 | 1.97 | 1.22 | 7.9 × 10−1 | 5.50 | 3.6 × 10−16 |
|
| 5.13 | 7.06 | 9.33 | 3.72 | −0.46 | 2.4 × 10−1 | 1.33 | 7.6 × 10−6 |
|
| 14.69 | 6.25 | 38.07 | 5.38 | 1.23 | 3.8 × 10−9 | 2.82 | 2.4 × 10−58 |
|
| 3.22 | 3.90 | 19.84 | 3.93 | −0.28 | 9.6 × 10−2 | 2.33 | 2.0 × 10−26 |
|
| 58.21 | 6.08 | 87.85 | 5.47 | 3.26 | 3.1 × 10−34 | 4.01 | 3.1 × 10−109 |
|
| 0.39 | 0.43 | 104.94 | 0.54 | −0.15 | 8.0 × 10−1 | 7.60 | 4.0 × 10−47 |
|
| 0.29 | 0.30 | 1.53 | 0.13 | −0.06 | 8.9 × 10−1 | 3.55 | 1.7 × 10−4 |
|
| 12.50 | 3.46 | 10.53 | 0.66 | 1.85 | 2.1 × 10−30 | 3.99 | 1.8 × 10−4 |
|
| 0.31 | 0.04 | 1.71 | 0.02 | 2.83 | 4.5 × 10−1 | 6.21 | 1.8 × 10−5 |
|
| 1.97 | 0.94 | 3.23 | 0.46 | 1.06 | 4.7 × 10−4 | 2.81 | 4.2 × 10−7 |
|
| 23.03 | 2.76 | 70.54 | 2.32 | 3.06 | 3.1 × 10−19 | 4.93 | 2.3 × 10−134 |
Figure 7The qRT-PCR analysis of five differentially expressed OfXTH genes treated at 19 °C and 23 °C. Significant differences are identified by SPSS (version 22) with Duncan’s test (p < 0.05) and are represented by different letters above the error bars.