Literature DB >> 35447610

Mutual enhancing learning-based automatic segmentation of CT cardiac substructure.

Shadab Momin1, Yang Lei1, Neal S McCall1, Jiahan Zhang1, Justin Roper1, Joseph Harms2, Sibo Tian1, Michael S Lloyd3, Tian Liu1, Jeffrey D Bradley1, Kristin Higgins1, Xiaofeng Yang1.   

Abstract

Objective.Current segmentation practice for thoracic cancer RT considers the whole heart as a single organ despite increased risks of cardiac toxicities from irradiation of specific cardiac substructures. Segmenting up to 15 different cardiac substructures can be a very time-intensive process, especially due to their different volume sizes and anatomical variations amongst different patients. In this work, a new deep learning (DL)-based mutual enhancing strategy is introduced for accurate and automatic segmentation, especially of smaller substructures such as coronary arteries.Approach.Our proposed method consists of three subnetworks: retina U-net, classification module, and segmentation module. Retina U-net is used as a backbone network architecture that aims to learn deep features from the whole heart. Whole heart feature maps from retina U-net are then transferred to four different sets of classification modules to generate classification localization maps of coronary arteries, great vessels, chambers of the heart, and valves of the heart. Each classification module is in sync with its corresponding subsequent segmentation module in a bootstrapping manner, allowing them to share their encoding paths to generate a mutual enhancing strategy. We evaluated our method on three different datasets: institutional CT datasets (55 subjects) 2) publicly available Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation (MM-WHS) challenge datasets (120 subjects), and Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) datasets (100 subjects). For institutional datasets, we performed five-fold cross-validation on training data (45 subjects) and performed inference on separate hold-out data (10 subjects). For each subject, 15 cardiac substructures were manually contoured by a resident physician and evaluated by an attending radiation oncologist. For the MM-WHS dataset, we trained the network on 100 datasets and performed an inference on a separate hold-out dataset with 20 subjects, each with 7 cardiac substructures. For ACDC datasets, we performed five-fold cross-validation on 100 datasets, each with 3 cardiac substructures. We compared the proposed method against four different network architectures: 3D U-net, mask R-CNN, mask scoring R-CNN, and proposed network without classification module. Segmentation accuracies were statistically compared through dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard, 95% Hausdorff distance, mean surface distance, root mean square distance, center of mass distance, and volume difference.Main results.The proposed method generated cardiac substructure segmentations with significantly higher accuracy (P < 0.05) for small substructures, especially for coronary arteries such as left anterior descending artery (CA-LADA) and right coronary artery (CA-RCA) in comparison to four competing methods. For large substructures (i.e. chambers of the heart), our method yielded comparable results to mask scoring R-CNN method, resulting in significantly (P < 0.05) improved segmentation accuracy in comparison to 3D U-net and mask R-CNN.Significance.A new DL-based mutual enhancing strategy was introduced for automatic segmentation of cardiac substructures. Overall results of this work demonstrate the ability of the proposed method to improve segmentation accuracies of smaller substructures such as coronary arteries without largely compromising the segmentation accuracies of larger substructures. Fast and accurate segmentations of up to 15 substructures can possibly be used as a tool to rapidly generate substructure segmentations followed by physicians' reviews to improve clinical workflow.
© 2022 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep learning; heart; segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35447610      PMCID: PMC9148580          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac692d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   4.174


  31 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the heart.

Authors:  Giovanna Gagliardi; Louis S Constine; Vitali Moiseenko; Candace Correa; Lori J Pierce; Aaron M Allen; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of atlas based auto-segmentation of cardiac structures in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Robert Kaderka; Erin F Gillespie; Robert C Mundt; Alex K Bryant; Camila B Sanudo-Thomas; Anna L Harrison; Emilie L Wouters; Vitali Moiseenko; Kevin L Moore; Todd F Atwood; James D Murphy
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Cardiac toxicity in association with chemotherapy and radiation therapy in a large cohort of older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  D Hardy; C-C Liu; J N Cormier; R Xia; X L Du
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Feasibility of multi-atlas cardiac segmentation from thoracic planning CT in a probabilistic framework.

Authors:  Robert Finnegan; Jason Dowling; Eng-Siew Koh; Simon Tang; James Otton; Geoff Delaney; Vikneswary Batumalai; Carol Luo; Pramukh Atluri; Athiththa Satchithanandha; David Thwaites; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Noninvasive Cardiac Radiation for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Phillip S Cuculich; Matthew R Schill; Rojano Kashani; Sasa Mutic; Adam Lang; Daniel Cooper; Mitchell Faddis; Marye Gleva; Amit Noheria; Timothy W Smith; Dennis Hallahan; Yoram Rudy; Clifford G Robinson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Association of Breast Cancer Irradiation With Cardiac Toxic Effects: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Icro Meattini; Philip M Poortmans; Marianne Camille Aznar; Carlotta Becherini; Elisabetta Bonzano; Daniela Cardinale; Daniel J Lenihan; Livia Marrazzo; Giuseppe Curigliano; Lorenzo Livi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Is pulmonary artery a dose-limiting organ at risk in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy?

Authors:  Jie-Tao Ma; Li Sun; Xin Sun; Zhi-Cheng Xiong; Yang Liu; Shu-Ling Zhang; Le-Tian Huang; Cheng-Bo Han
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Influence of different treatment techniques on radiation dose to the LAD coronary artery.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Sabine Schill; Peter Kneschaurek; Michael Molls
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Deep Learning for Cardiac Image Segmentation: A Review.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Chen Qin; Huaqi Qiu; Giacomo Tarroni; Jinming Duan; Wenjia Bai; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-03-05

Review 10.  Knowledge-based radiation treatment planning: A data-driven method survey.

Authors:  Shadab Momin; Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Justin Roper; Jeffrey D Bradley; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.