Literature DB >> 30107948

Geometric and dosimetric evaluation of atlas based auto-segmentation of cardiac structures in breast cancer patients.

Robert Kaderka1, Erin F Gillespie1, Robert C Mundt1, Alex K Bryant1, Camila B Sanudo-Thomas1, Anna L Harrison1, Emilie L Wouters1, Vitali Moiseenko1, Kevin L Moore1, Todd F Atwood1, James D Murphy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Auto-segmentation represents an efficient tool to segment organs on CT imaging. Primarily used in clinical setting, auto-segmentation plays an increasing role in research, particularly when analyzing thousands of images in the "big data" era. In this study we evaluate the accuracy of cardiac dosimetric endpoints derived from atlas based auto-segmentation compared to gold standard manual segmentation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Heart and cardiac substructures were manually delineated on 54 breast cancer patients. Twenty-seven patients were used to build the auto-segmentation atlas, the other 27 to validate performance. We evaluated accuracy of the auto-segmented contours with standard geometric indices and assessed dosimetric endpoints.
RESULTS: Auto-segmented contours overlapped geometrically with manual contours of the heart and chambers with Dice-similarity coefficients of 0.93 ± 0.02 (mean ± standard deviation) and 0.79 ± 0.07 respectively. Similarly, there was a strong link between dosimetric parameters derived from auto-segmented and manual contours (R2 = 0.955-1.000). On the other hand, the left anterior descending artery had little geometric overlap (Dice-similarity coefficient 0.09 ± 0.07), though acceptable representation of dosimetric parameters (R2 = 0.646-0.992).
CONCLUSIONS: The atlas based auto-segmentation approach delineates heart structures with sufficient accuracy for research purposes. Our results indicate that quality of auto-segmented contours cannot be determined by geometric values only.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas based auto-segmentation; Breast cancer; Heart contouring

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30107948     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  16 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Mutual enhancing learning-based automatic segmentation of CT cardiac substructure.

Authors:  Shadab Momin; Yang Lei; Neal S McCall; Jiahan Zhang; Justin Roper; Joseph Harms; Sibo Tian; Michael S Lloyd; Tian Liu; Jeffrey D Bradley; Kristin Higgins; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Cardiac substructure segmentation with deep learning for improved cardiac sparing.

Authors:  Eric D Morris; Ahmed I Ghanem; Ming Dong; Milan V Pantelic; Eleanor M Walker; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A novel specific grading standard study of auto-segmentation of organs at risk in thorax: subjective-objective-combined grading standard.

Authors:  Yanchen Ying; Hao Wang; Hua Chen; Jianfan Cheng; Hengle Gu; Yan Shao; Yanhua Duan; Aihui Feng; Wen Feng; Xiaolong Fu; Hong Quan; Zhiyong Xu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto-segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Sharif Elguindi; Simon Duke; Li-Tee Tan; Jon Cacicedo; Max Dahele; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.901

6.  Is mean heart dose a relevant surrogate parameter of left ventricle and coronary arteries exposure during breast cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric evaluation based on individually-determined radiation dose (BACCARAT study).

Authors:  Sophie Jacob; Jérémy Camilleri; Sylvie Derreumaux; Valentin Walker; Olivier Lairez; Mathieu Lapeyre; Eric Bruguière; Atul Pathak; Marie-Odile Bernier; Dominique Laurier; Jean Ferrieres; Olivier Gallocher; Igor Latorzeff; Baptiste Pinel; Denis Franck; Christian Chevelle; Gaëlle Jimenez; David Broggio
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Atlas Sampling for Prone Breast Automatic Segmentation of Organs at Risk: The Importance of Patients' Body Mass Index and Breast Cup Size for an Optimized Contouring of the Heart and the Coronary Vessels.

Authors:  Xinzhuo Wang; Raymond Miralbell; Odile Fargier-Bochaton; Shelley Bulling; Jean Paul Vallée; Giovanna Dipasquale
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

8.  Automatic segmentation of cardiac structures for breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jae Won Jung; Choonik Lee; Elizabeth G Mosher; Matthew M Mille; Yeon Soo Yeom; Elizabeth C Jones; Minsoo Choi; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-05

9.  Technical note: Atlas-based Auto-segmentation of masticatory muscles for head and neck cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Xiangguo Zhang; Haihui Chen; Wen Chen; Brandon A Dyer; Quan Chen; Stanley H Benedict; Shyam Rao; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  The dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Hongbo Guo; Jiazhou Wang; Xiang Xia; Yang Zhong; Jiayuan Peng; Zhen Zhang; Weigang Hu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.