| Literature DB >> 35446156 |
Ching Ann Tee1,2, Zheng Yang1,3, Yingnan Wu1,3, Xiafei Ren1,3, Maciej Baranski2, Daryl Jimian Lin1,3, Afizah Hassan1,3, Jongyoon Han2,4, Eng Hin Lee1,2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The zonal properties of articular cartilage critically contribute to the mechanical support and lubrication of the tissue. Current treatments for articular cartilage have yet to regenerate this zonal architecture, thus compromising the functional efficacy of the repaired tissue and leading to tissue degeneration in the long term. In this study, the efficacy of zonal cartilage regeneration through bilayered implantation of expanded autologous zonal chondrocytes was investigated in a porcine chondral defect model.Entities:
Keywords: articular cartilage; autologous chondrocyte implantation; dynamic microcarrier culture; inertial spiral microchannel; zonal chondrocytes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35446156 PMCID: PMC9152227 DOI: 10.1177/19476035221093063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cartilage ISSN: 1947-6035 Impact factor: 3.117
Figure 1.(A) Illustration of post-expansion sorting strategy. Full thickness (FT) chondrocytes were isolated from cartilage plugs. Cell number ranges from 0.2-1.4 x 106 of chondrocytes can be isolated from 0.5 cm2 of articular cartilage. At the end of 4 weeks expansion, dynamic microcarrier culture yielded around 60 x 106 chondrocytes. Expanded chondrocytes were then subjected to size-based sorting using inertial spiral microchannel device to enrich zonal chondrocyte subpopulations. (B) Illustration of the animal surgery timeline. Non-weight-bearing articular cartilage plugs were collected 4 weeks before implantation for chondrocytes isolation, expansion, and size-based sorting to derived zonal chondrocytes. Animals were separated into 4 groups. Six months post-implantation, the femoral condyles with defects were collected for analysis. TCP = tissue plate culture platform.
Summary on the Observation on Zonal Characteristic of Regenerated Tissues Based on H&E Staining, PRG4 Immunohistology and Polarized Light Microscopy.
| Control | TCP FT | dMC FT | dMC Bilayer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Columnar chondrocyte organization (H&E staining) | ||||
| Edge of defects | 2/6 (33.3%) | 2/6 (33.3%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 3/6 (50.0%) |
| Center of defects | 2/6 (33.3%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 3/6 (50.0%) |
| PRG4 localization at SZ (Immunostaining) | 2/6 (33.3%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 4/6 (66.7%) |
| Distinct collagen alignment at SZ and MZ/DZ (Polarized light microscopy) | 0/6 (0%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 2/6 (33.3%) | 4/6 (66.7%) |
| Fibrillation (H&E staining) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 2/6 (33.3%) |
TCP = tissue plate culture platform; FT = full thickness; dMC = dynamic microcarrier; SZ = superficial zone; MZ = middle zone; DZ = deep zone.
Summary on the Observation on Structural Integrity of Subchondral Bone Based on MRI Analysis and MicroCT Imaging.
| Control | TCP FT | dMC FT | dMC Bilayer | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRI | ||||
| Subchondral bone defects | 2/4 (50%) | 0/4 (0%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 1/6 (16.7%) |
| Articular cartilage thinning | 0/4 (0%) | 2/4 (50%) | 0/6 (0%) | 1/6 (16.7%) |
| MicroCT | ||||
| Subchondral bone defects | 5/6 (83.3%) | 2/6 (33.3%) | 4/6 (66.7%) | 1/6 (16.7%) |
| Subchondral bone overgrowth | 2/6 (33.3%) | 3/6 (50.0%) | 1/6 (16.7%) | 1/6 (16.7%) |
| Subchondral bone uniformity scoring | 1.83 ± 0.41 | 2.17 ± 0.41 | 2.08 ± 0.29 | 2.67 ± 0.52[ |
Subchondral bone uniformity scoring are presented as mean ± standard deviation, n = 6 per group. Subchondral bone with uniform surface = 3; Subchondral bone with erosion or advancement = 2; Subchondral bone with both erosion and advancement = 1.
MRI = Magnetic Resonance Imaging; TCP = tissue plate culture platform; FT = full thickness; dMC = dynamic microcarrier.
denotes significant difference as compared to control.
denotes significant difference as compared to dMC FT.