Literature DB >> 17532744

Short-term retention of labeled chondrocyte subpopulations in stratified tissue-engineered cartilaginous constructs implanted in vivo in mini-pigs.

Kanika Chawla1, Travis J Klein, Barbara L Schumacher, Kyle D Jadin, Bansari H Shah, Koichi Nakagawa, Van W Wong, Albert C Chen, Koichi Masuda, Robert L Sah.   

Abstract

It is likely that effective application of cell-laden implants for cartilage defects depends on retention of implanted cells and interaction between implanted and host cells. The objectives of this study were to characterize stratified cartilaginous constructs seeded sequentially with superficial (S) and middle (M) chondrocyte subpopulations labeled with fluorescent cell tracking dye PKH26 (*) and determine the degree to which these stratified cartilaginous constructs maintain their architecture in vivo after implantation in mini-pigs for 1 week. Alginate-recovered cells were seeded sequentially to form stratified S*/M (only S cells labeled) and S*/M* (both S and M cells labeled) constructs. Full-thickness defects (4 mm diameter) were created in the patellofemoral groove of adult Yucatan mini-pigs and filled with portions of constructs or left empty. Constructs were characterized biochemically, histologically, and biomechanically, and stratification visualized and quantified, before and after implant. After 1 week, animals were sacrificed and implants retrieved. After 1 week in vivo, glycosaminoglycan and collagen content of constructs remained similar to that at implant, whereas DNA content increased. Histological analyses revealed features of an early repair response, with defects filled with tissues containing little matrix and abundant cells. Some implanted (PKH26-labeled) cells persisted in the defects, although constructs did not maintain a stratified organization. Of the labeled cells, 126 +/- 38% and 32 +/- 8% in S*/M and S*/M* constructs, respectively, were recovered. Distribution of labeled cells indicated interactions between implanted and host cells. Longer-term in vivo studies will be useful in determining whether implanted cells are sufficient to have a positive effect in repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17532744     DOI: 10.1089/ten.2007.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng        ISSN: 1076-3279


  16 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of chondrocytes labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in tissue-engineered cartilage.

Authors:  Sharan Ramaswamy; Jane B Greco; Mehmet C Uluer; Zijun Zhang; Zhuoli Zhang; Kenneth W Fishbein; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  * Optimization of Preculture Conditions to Maximize the In Vivo Performance of Cell-Seeded Engineered Intervertebral Discs.

Authors:  John T Martin; Sarah E Gullbrand; Bhavana Mohanraj; Beth G Ashinsky; Dong Hwa Kim; Kensuke Ikuta; Dawn M Elliott; Lachlan J Smith; Robert L Mauck; Harvey E Smith
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Cartilage repair and subchondral bone remodeling in response to focal lesions in a mini-pig model: implications for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Matthew B Fisher; Nicole S Belkin; Andrew H Milby; Elizabeth A Henning; Marc Bostrom; Minwook Kim; Christian Pfeifer; Gregory Meloni; George R Dodge; Jason A Burdick; Thomas P Schaer; David R Steinberg; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Biomaterials to Mimic and Heal Connective Tissues.

Authors:  Benjamin R Freedman; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 30.849

5.  Zonal chondrocytes seeded in a layered agarose hydrogel create engineered cartilage with depth-dependent cellular and mechanical inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Kenneth W Ng; Gerard A Ateshian; Clark T Hung
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Pre-clinical characterization of tissue engineering constructs for bone and cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Jordan E Trachtenberg; Tiffany N Vo; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 7.  Tissue engineering of articular cartilage with biomimetic zones.

Authors:  Travis J Klein; Jos Malda; Robert L Sah; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Bilayer Implants: Electromechanical Assessment of Regenerated Articular Cartilage in a Sheep Model.

Authors:  Jan C Schagemann; Nicola Rudert; Michelle E Taylor; Sotcheadt Sim; Eric Quenneville; Martin Garon; Mathias Klinger; Michael D Buschmann; Hagen Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Shaped, stratified, scaffold-free grafts for articular cartilage defects.

Authors:  EunHee Han; Won C Bae; Nancy D Hsieh-Bonassera; Van W Wong; Barbara L Schumacher; Simon Görtz; Koichi Masuda; William D Bugbee; Robert L Sah
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effect of risedronate in a minipig cartilage defect model with allograft.

Authors:  Carol Muehleman; Jun Li; Yumiko Abe; Brian Pfister; Robert L Sah; Roger Phipps; Koichi Masuda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.