| Literature DB >> 35441890 |
Noah B Bonnheim1, Linshanshan Wang1, Ann A Lazar2, Jiamin Zhou3, Ravi Chachad3, Nico Sollmann3,4,5,6, Xiaojie Guo1, Claudia Iriondo3, Conor O'Neill1, Jeffrey C Lotz1, Thomas M Link3, Roland Krug3, Aaron J Fields7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The composition of the subchondral bone marrow and cartilage endplate (CEP) could affect intervertebral disc health by influencing vertebral perfusion and nutrient diffusion. However, the relative contributions of these factors to disc degeneration in patients with chronic low back pain (cLBP) have not been quantified. The goal of this study was to use compositional biomarkers derived from quantitative MRI to establish how CEP composition (surrogate for permeability) and vertebral bone marrow fat fraction (BMFF, surrogate for perfusion) relate to disc degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Cartilage endplate; Chronic low back pain; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Vertebral bone marrow
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35441890 PMCID: PMC9252939 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07206-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Spine J ISSN: 0940-6719 Impact factor: 2.721
Fig. 1Representative MRI image, tissue segmentations, and biomarker visualization for the cartilage endplate (top row), vertebral bone marrow (middle row), and intervertebral disc (bottom row). CEP = cartilage endplate, BMFF = bone marrow fat fraction, NP = nucleus pulposus
Patient demographic and clinical data from the n = 60 people included in the analysis
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 40.0 ± 11.9 (19–65) |
| Female, male | 28 (47%), 32 (53%) |
| Weight (kg) | 76.1 ± 13.2 (50–116) |
| Height (cm) | 171.2 ± 12.2 (122–193) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.1 ± 4.7 (18.8–45.7) |
| ODI | 26.1 ± 14.6 (2–74) |
| VAS | 6.5 ± 2.4 (1–11) |
| Pfirrmann grade | |
| I | 7 (10%) |
| II | 30 (43%) |
| III | 17 (25%) |
| IV | 15 (22%) |
| V | 0 (0%) |
Data are presented as mean ± SD (min–max) or number (percent of total)
Fig. 2Scatter plots showing the independent relationships between NP T1ρ and a vertebral BMFF and b CEP T2*
Pearson correlation coefficient quantifying the cross-correlations between NP T1ρ and the continuous explanatory variables
| NP T1ρ | CEP T2* | BMFF | Age | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEP T2* | 0.259†† | – | ||
| BMFF | − 0.333††† | − 0.160 | – | |
| Age | − 0.381††† | − 0.185† | 0.599††† | – |
| BMI | 0.043 | 0.339††† | − 0.049 | − 0.100 |
†p < 0.05
††p < 0.01
†††p < 0.0001
Parameter estimates (βi) and 95% confidence intervals generated from a mixed effects linear regression model accounting for multiple spinal levels per subject predicting NP T1ρ (outcome)
| Term | βi estimate | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEP T2* | 1.06 | 0.53 | 1.59 | 0.0001† |
| Level | 5.80 | 3.76 | 7.84 | < .0001* |
| CEP T2* × Level | 0.83 | 0.37 | 1.30 | 0.0006† |
| Age | − 0.45 | − 0.83 | − 0.06 | 0.0245† |
| Vertebral BMFF | − 0.13 | − 0.47 | 0.20 | 0.431 |
| Sex | 2.32 | − 1.89 | 6.53 | 0.275 |
| BMI | − 0.26 | − 1.15 | 0.64 | 0.567 |
† indicates two-sided p < 0.05
Parameter estimates (βi) and 95% confidence intervals generated from a mixed effects linear regression model accounting for multiple spinal levels per subject predicting NP T1ρ (outcome)
| Term | βi estimate | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level | 5.88 | 3.31 | 8.46 | < .0001* |
| CEP T2* | 1.07 | 0.51 | 1.63 | 0.0003† |
| CEP T2* × Level | 0.83 | 0.32 | 1.34 | 0.0018† |
| Age | − 0.40 | − 0.79 | − 0.02 | 0.0395† |
| Vertebral BMFF | − 0.19 | − 0.62 | 0.24 | 0.384 |
| Vertebral BMFF × Level | − 0.01 | − 0.30 | 0.27 | 0.922 |
| CEP T2* × Vertebral BMFF | − 0.01 | − 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.726 |
| CEP T2* × Vertebral BMFF × Level | 0.00 | − 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.931 |
† indicates two-sided p < 0.05