Literature DB >> 23325347

Saccades to future ball location reveal memory-based prediction in a virtual-reality interception task.

Gabriel Diaz1, Joseph Cooper, Constantin Rothkopf, Mary Hayhoe.   

Abstract

Despite general agreement that prediction is a central aspect of perception, there is relatively little evidence concerning the basis on which visual predictions are made. Although both saccadic and pursuit eye-movements reveal knowledge of the future position of a moving visual target, in many of these studies targets move along simple trajectories through a fronto-parallel plane. Here, using a naturalistic and racquet-based interception task in a virtual environment, we demonstrate that subjects make accurate predictions of visual target motion, even when targets follow trajectories determined by the complex dynamics of physical interactions and the head and body are unrestrained. Furthermore, we found that, following a change in ball elasticity, subjects were able to accurately adjust their prebounce predictions of the ball's post-bounce trajectory. This suggests that prediction is guided by experience-based models of how information in the visual image will change over time.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23325347      PMCID: PMC3587002          DOI: 10.1167/13.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  56 in total

1.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Effects of learning on smooth pursuit during transient disappearance of a visual target.

Authors:  Laurent Madelain; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The dynamics of perception and action.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  A dynamic representation of target motion drives predictive smooth pursuit during target blanking.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Marcus Missal; Philippe Lefèvre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Keep your eyes on the ball: smooth pursuit eye movements enhance prediction of visual motion.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Alexander C Schütz; Doris I Braun; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics.

Authors:  Lingyun Zhang; Matthew H Tong; Tim K Marks; Honghao Shan; Garrison W Cottrell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  46 in total

1.  Real-time recording and classification of eye movements in an immersive virtual environment.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Dmitry Kit; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Memory and prediction in natural gaze control.

Authors:  Gabriel Diaz; Joseph Cooper; Mary Hayhoe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  How athletes hit a fastball.

Authors:  Liam Drew
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Recentering bias for temporal saccades only: Evidence from binocular recordings of eye movements.

Authors:  Jérôme Tagu; Karine Doré-Mazars; Judith Vergne; Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Hand interception of occluded motion in humans: a test of model-based vs. on-line control.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Visual motion modulates pattern sensitivity ahead, behind, and beside motion.

Authors:  Derek H Arnold; Welber Marinovic; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.