Eva A van Aalen1,2, Simone F A Wouters1,2, Dennis Verzijl3, Maarten Merkx1,2. 1. Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 2. Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 3. Genmab, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of cancer is essential for the efficacy of treatment. Our group recently developed RAPPID, a bioluminescent immunoassay platform capable of measuring a wide panel of biomarkers directly in solution. Here, we developed and systematically screened different RAPPID sensors for sensitive detection of the soluble fraction of Axl (sAxl), a cell surface receptor that is overexpressed in several types of cancer. The best-performing RAPPID sensor, with a limit of detection of 8 pM and a >9-fold maximal change in emission ratio, was applied to measure Axl in three different contexts: clinically relevant sAxl levels (∼0.5 and ∼1 nM) in diluted blood plasma, proteolytically cleaved Axl in the cell culture medium of A431 and HeLa cancer cells, and Axl on the membrane of A431 cells. We further extended the sensor toolbox by developing dual-color RAPPID for simultaneous detection of Axl and EGFR on A431 and HeLa cells, as well as an AND-gate RAPPID that measures the concurrent presence of these two cell surface receptors on the same cell. These new RAPPID sensors provide attractive alternatives for more laborious protein detection and quantification methods such as FACS and immunostainings, due to their simple practical implantation and low intrinsic background signal.
Early diagnosis of cancer is essential for the efficacy of treatment. Our group recently developed RAPPID, a bioluminescent immunoassay platform capable of measuring a wide panel of biomarkers directly in solution. Here, we developed and systematically screened different RAPPID sensors for sensitive detection of the soluble fraction of Axl (sAxl), a cell surface receptor that is overexpressed in several types of cancer. The best-performing RAPPID sensor, with a limit of detection of 8 pM and a >9-fold maximal change in emission ratio, was applied to measure Axl in three different contexts: clinically relevant sAxl levels (∼0.5 and ∼1 nM) in diluted blood plasma, proteolytically cleaved Axl in the cell culture medium of A431 and HeLa cancer cells, and Axl on the membrane of A431 cells. We further extended the sensor toolbox by developing dual-color RAPPID for simultaneous detection of Axl and EGFR on A431 and HeLa cells, as well as an AND-gate RAPPID that measures the concurrent presence of these two cell surface receptors on the same cell. These new RAPPID sensors provide attractive alternatives for more laborious protein detection and quantification methods such as FACS and immunostainings, due to their simple practical implantation and low intrinsic background signal.
Biomarker-specific
point-of-care (POC) tests that enable noninvasive
diagnostic testing and screening outside the hospital and traditional
laboratories represent a promising approach for the diagnosis of early-stage
cancer.[1,2] Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most
common liver malignancy and early detection and prognosis increase
therapy effectiveness.[3−5] Therapeutic curative approaches, like surgery and
chemotherapy, are typically only effective for early-stage HCC and
limited for later stage of the disease.[6] At present, imaging techniques such as transabdominal ultrasonography
(US) are the most commonly used screening methods for high-risk patients.[7−9] US is cost-effective but suboptimal for the detection of early-stage
HCC, due to a moderate sensitivity of around 60%.[10] The serum biomarker α-fetoprotein (AFP) is also used
to detect early-stage HCC,[11,12] but its low sensitivity
(41–65%) makes it ill-suited for a POC diagnostic setting.[13] Therefore, novel noninvasive serological biomarkers
would greatly improve the early detection and prognosis of HCC and
might enable the development of POC tests.Recent studies have
shown that Axl is an accurate biomarker for
early HCC and outperforms AFP.[14−16] Aberrant expression of Axl, a
member of the TAM (Tyro3, Axl, Mer) receptor family of the receptor
tyrosine kinases (RTKs), is associated with various cancers, including
renal cell carcinoma,[17] non-small-cell
lung cancer,[18−20] breast cancer,[21] melanoma,[22] and HCC.[23] The Axl
receptor consists of an extracellular portion, with two fibronectin
type III-like (FNIII-like) domains and two immunoglobulin-like (Ig-like)
repeats, and an intracellular element with a tyrosine kinase domain.[24] The activation and dimerization of Axl occurs
via extracellular binding to its ligand growth arrest-specific gene
6 (Gas6) or via auto-activation as a result of Axl overexpression.[23,25] Subsequent autophosphorylation and transphosphorylation of the intracellular
domain of Axl induces downstream activation of pathways that promote
cancer cell proliferation, invasion, migration, and survival.[23] Furthermore, the receptor can be proteolytically
cleaved or shedded, releasing an ∼80 to 85 kDa extracellular
domain, known as soluble Axl (sAxl), which can be measured in blood
plasma (Figure a).[26] However, a challenge of using sAxl as a biomarker
is the relatively small difference between serum sAxl concentrations
in healthy individuals (40 ng/mL or ∼0.5 nM) and sAxl levels
associated with early HCC (80 ng/mL or ∼1 nM) or late HCC (114.5
ng/mL or ∼1.43 nM).[14] Currently,
sAxl is often measured with ELISA,[14,27,28] which requires multiple washing and incubation steps
and is hence time-consuming, unsuitable for measurements directly
in solution, and challenging to translate to POC applications. Current
POC immunoassay formats such as lateral flow immunoassays (LFIA) do
not allow accurate determination of biomarker concentration and can
therefore not distinguish between the relative small differences in
physiological and pathophysiological sAxl concentrations. A single-step
detection method for sAxl that can be applied directly in blood plasma
shows potential as a diagnostic tool for the early detection of HCC.
Figure 1
Development
of RAPPID assays for detection of soluble Axl (sAxl).
(a) Axl is overexpressed on the cellular membrane of various types
of cancers. Shedding of Axl results in the release of the soluble
extracellular fraction of Axl, which is subsequently found in blood
plasma and can serve as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC). (b) Schematic overview of the RAPPID assay. Anti-Axl
antibodies are conjugated to either large BiT (LB) or small BiT (SB),
the split variant of the NanoLuc luciferase (NLuc). Analyte binding
results in the complementation of split NLuc, increasing the emission
of blue light. The green light-emitting calibrator luciferase is used
to make the RAPPID assay ratiometric, enabling accurate quantification
of Axl directly in solution. (c) Four anti-Axl antibodies, with different
affinities and epitopes, were used to develop six Axl-RAPPID variants.
(d) The Axl-RAPPID assay is applied for diagnostic purposes, measurements
in cell culture medium and for the detection of cell surface receptors.
Development
of RAPPID assays for detection of soluble Axl (sAxl).
(a) Axl is overexpressed on the cellular membrane of various types
of cancers. Shedding of Axl results in the release of the soluble
extracellular fraction of Axl, which is subsequently found in blood
plasma and can serve as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC). (b) Schematic overview of the RAPPID assay. Anti-Axl
antibodies are conjugated to either large BiT (LB) or small BiT (SB),
the split variant of the NanoLuc luciferase (NLuc). Analyte binding
results in the complementation of split NLuc, increasing the emission
of blue light. The green light-emitting calibrator luciferase is used
to make the RAPPID assay ratiometric, enabling accurate quantification
of Axl directly in solution. (c) Four anti-Axl antibodies, with different
affinities and epitopes, were used to develop six Axl-RAPPID variants.
(d) The Axl-RAPPID assay is applied for diagnostic purposes, measurements
in cell culture medium and for the detection of cell surface receptors.Bioluminescent-based homogeneous sensors that display
a change
in color upon analyte binding show great promise for measurements
in complex media such as blood plasma, as minimal sample pretreatment
is required.[29] Unlike fluorescence-based
methods, bioluminescent sensors do not need external excitation, thus
eliminating issues associated with autofluorescence or light scattering.[29,30] Recently, we established RAPPID (Ratiometric Plug-and-Play ImmunoDiagnostics),
a mix-and-measure immunoassay platform based on the reconstitution
of antibody-conjugated split NanoLuc luciferases.[31,32] The platform is highly modular, as it entails monoclonal antibodies
and photoconjugation through a protein G adaptor (Gx, Figure b).[33] The straightforward development of a RAPPID assay enables the easy
exchange of antibodies and hence screening for the best antibody pair
and optimal sensor. Furthermore, the RAPPID platform has a high intrinsic
maximal change in emission ratio and a robust ratiometric light output,
enabled by the introduction of a green-emitting calibrator luciferase,
facilitating the accurate detection of biomarkers in the picomolar
to nanomolar range.[32] The ratiometric nature
of the RAPPID assay should make it an attractive diagnostic tool to
detect challenging biomarkers, such as sAxl, with a small difference
in concentrations associated with healthy and diseased individuals.Here, four different human monoclonal antibodies, targeting either
the FNIII-like or Ig-like domain of Axl, were utilized to develop
six different RAPPID sensors and were systematically screened to obtain
an optimal assay for sAxl detection (Figure b,c). This optimized assay was subsequently
used to accurately quantify physiological and pathophysiological sAxl
concentrations in blood plasma. We also further extended the RAPPID
assay platform to enable both the direct detection of cell surface-bound
Axl and the simultaneous single-step detection of multiple cancer-related
cell surface receptors (Figure d).
Experimental Section
Cloning
The pET28a(+) vectors with
DNA encoding for
Gx-SB, Gx-LB, and calibrator luciferase (mNG-NL)[34,35] were ordered from Genscript as described in ref (32). A pETa(+) expression
plasmid for Gx-mNeonGreen-SB (Gx-mNG-SB) was developed by cloning
DNA encoding for mNG into the Gx-SB vector by overhang extension PCR.
The cloning results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (BaseClear).
DNA and amino acid sequences of Gx-SB and Gx-LB are listed in ref (32). DNA and amino acid sequence
for Gx-mNG-SB can be found in Figure S1.
Protein Expression
Gx-SB, Gx-LB, and Gx-mNG-SB were
expressed as described before.[32] The pEVOL-pBpF vector for the incorporation of the unnatural amino
acid p-benzoylphenylalanine (pBpA,
Bachem, 104504-45-2) was a gift from Peter Schultz (Addgene plasmid
# 31190).[36] All fusion proteins were purified
using Ni2+ affinity chromatography followed by Strep-Tactin
purification (IBA Lifesciences). The purity of Gx-SB, Gx-LB, Gx-mNG-SB,
and calibrator luciferase was determined using SDS-PAGE analysis (Figure S2 and ref (32)). The human anti-Axl antibodies A, C, and D
were generated as described in ref (22). Axl-B is an in-house produced prior-art antibody
and is an IgG1 variant of the U3-11B7 antibody against Axl (U3 Pharma,
WO 2009062690) with rat VH and human HC. All proteins were stored
at −80 °C until use.
Photoconjugation
Gx-SB and Gx-LB were photoconjugated
to anti-Axl antibodies (A, B, C, and D), Gx-LB was coupled to cetuximab
(obtained via the Catherina hospital pharmacy in Eindhoven) and Gx-mNG-SB
was conjugated to cetuximab and anti-Axl C. Photoconjugation was performed
for 90 minutes under a Promed UVL-30 UV light source (4 × 9 W)
in PCR tubes in PBS (pH 7.4) on ice. The extent of photoconjugation
was verified using a nonreducing SDS-PAGE analysis. An extensive photoconjugation
protocol can be found in ref (32). Antibody conjugates were stored at 4 °C until use.
Luminescent RAPPID Assays
RAPPID assays were done in
PBS (pH 7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA) or diluted human blood plasma (ACD, DivBioScience)
in nontreated white Thermo Scientific 384-well plates (Cat. no 262360)
in a volume of 20 μL. An assay mix with 1–20 pM calibrator
luciferase, 1 nM antibody-SB, and 1 nM antibody-LB was added to the
buffer or diluted plasma, followed by an incubation step of 1 h at
room temperature. After the addition of 1500-fold diluted (measurements
in buffer) or 400-fold diluted (blood plasma measurements) NLuc substrate
(Promega, N1110), the luminescent spectra were recorded between 398
and 653 nm on a Tecan Spark 10 M plate reader (bandwidth 25 nm; 22
°C). The blue-to-green ratios were calculated by dividing the
blue light emission at 458 by the green light emission at 518 nm.
The LOD was calculated using eq , in which SD is the standard error of the y-intercept, by linear regression of the blue-to-green ratios related
to a selection of low sAxl concentrations.
RAPPID Assay in Cell Medium
HeLa cells and HEK293 cells
were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM,
from Gibco) and A431 cells were grown in RPMI medium (Gibco). All
cells were cultured in Falcon corning T75 culture flasks (REF 353136).
Both RPMI and DMEM were supplemented with 4.5 g/L d-glucose,
0.58 g/L l-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL
penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (all from Life Technologies),
and grown at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Both DMEM and RPMI
medium contained phenol red. The cells were cultured for three days
until a confluency of 80% was reached. Subsequently, the medium (12
mL) was removed from the cells, centrifuged at 10,000g to remove residual cells, and diluted five-fold with PBS (pH 7.4,
0.1% (w/v) BSA). Next, the sensor mix (0.6 nM anti-Axl-C antibody-SB,
0.6 nM anti-Axl-D antibody-LB, and 2 pM calibrator luciferase) was
added to the medium in a white Thermo Scientific 96-well plate (Cat.
no 236108) to create a final culture medium concentration of 10%,
in a total volume of 100 μL. After 1 h incubation, 1500×
diluted NLuc substrate was added to the samples and bioluminescence
was measured using a Tecan Spark 10 M plate reader.
Cellular Assays
HeLa, HEK293, and A431 cells were cultured
as described above. The cells were released from the culture flask
using trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and counted with a digital
cell counter (CytoSMART Cell Counter, version 3). Subsequently, the
cells were washed with PBS (pH 7.4) and diluted to 5 million cells/mL
in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA). An increasing number of cells was
added to the sensor mixture (0.6 or 0.25 nM of antibody-sensor conjugate
and 2 or 5 pM calibrator luciferase) in a 96-well plate to make a
final volume of 100 μL. After the addition of 1500-fold diluted
NLuc substrate, bioluminescence was monitored on a Tecan Spark 10
M plate reader with an integration time of 200 ms.
Results and Discussion
Development
of sAxl-RAPPID Assays
The performance of
the RAPPID platform is dependent on the antibodies used, as their
affinities and the specific sandwich complex architecture determine
the limit of detection (LOD), the detectable analyte concentration
range, and the maximal change in emission ratio. Therefore, the antibody
selection procedure is an important aspect of designing a RAPPID sensor.
This is particularly critical when the physiologically relevant concentrations
are in the picomolar to low nanomolar range and hence dilution of
the sample, to allow tunable measurements of the analyte across the
desired concentration range, is not obvious. Hence, to allow accurate
distinction between healthy sAxl levels and concentrations associated
with early HCC, we explored four previously developed human anti-Axl
IgG1 antibodies (A, B, C, and D) with different antigen-binding properties.[22] Mapping of the binding sites of these four antibodies
revealed that antibodies A and B bind to the Ig2 domain of Axl and
antibodies C and D to the FN1 and FN2 domain of the FNIII-like repeat,
respectively (Table ). Furthermore, the two Ig-like binders have overlapping binding
sites on Axl, probably prohibiting the use of these two antibodies
in one RAPPID assay. The affinities of the anti-Axl antibodies were
determined using surface plasmon resonance (SPR), yielding dissociation
constants (KD) in the low-high nanomolar
range, ∼1.09, ∼19, ∼130, and ∼270 nM for
anti-Axl D, B, C, and A, respectively (Figure S3 and Table ).
Table 1
Overview of the Different sAxl-RAPPID
Sensors
antibody
combination
binding subdomain
on Axl
KD (nM)a
LOD (pM)
maximal change
in emission ratio
A-SB + B-LB
Ig2 + Ig2
270 + 19
A-SB + C-LB
Ig2 + FN1
270 + 130
90
2.9-fold
A-SB + D-LB
Ig2 + FN2
270 + 1.09
63
3.7-fold
C-SB + B-LB
FN1 + Ig2
130 + 19
360
1.7-fold
D-SB + B-LB
FN2 + Ig2
1.09 + 19
21
6.6-fold
C-SB + D-LB
FN1 + FN2
130 + 1.09
8
9.6-fold
KD values
of the antibodies used for the binding of sAxl as determined by SPR.
KD values
of the antibodies used for the binding of sAxl as determined by SPR.To establish a panel of sAxl-RAPPID
sensors, we used recombinant
protein expression in Escherichia coli to obtain the sensor components Gx-LB and Gx-SB, composed of a large
BiT (LB) or small BiT (SB, KD = 2.5 μM)
fragment of split NLuc fused to Gx.[31−33] Upon illumination with
UV light (λ = 365 nm), the unnatural amino acid p-benzoylphenylalanine (pBpA) in the protein G adaptor
(Gx) forms a covalent bond with the Fc-domain of the anti-Axl antibody
(Figure a). The four
antibodies displayed efficient photoconjugation, as SDS-PAGE analysis
showed conversion to primarily mono-conjugated and bi-conjugated species
after mixing the antibody and sensor protein in a 1:4 molar ratio
(Figure b). Subsequent
to the production of the antibody-luciferase components, six different
sensor combinations were analyzed for their performance to quantify
sAxl. First, we scrutinized the performance of the two FNIII binding
antibodies C and D, by adding increasing concentrations of sAxl to
1 nM of both sensor components and 20 pM of calibrator luciferase,
followed by an incubation step of 1 h. This incubation step allowed
for completed immunocomplex formation between antibody and analyte
(Figure S4), enabling NLuc to reconstitute
and resulting in increased blue light emission (Figure c). Light produced by an intensiometric assay
is known to be susceptible to changes in environmental factors like
pH and temperature and suffers from substrate depletion, decreasing
the light intensity over time. These properties impede quantitative
measurements and reduce the usability of the assay in a clinical or
POC setting. Therefore, we introduced the green light-emitting calibrator
luciferase, which enables ratiometric measurements by comparing the
blue light emitted by the complemented split NLuc of the sensor with
the green light of the calibrator (Figure S4).[32] The required amount of calibrator
luciferase depends on the absolute luminescent signal that is produced
in a specific assay and should be optimized accordingly. The FNIII
binding CD-RAPPID assay, composed of antibody C conjugated to Gx-SB
and antibody D fused to Gx-LB, displayed an sAxl concentration-dependent
change in color from green to blue, with a low limit of detection
of 8 pM (Figure d).
This response could be detected both by plate reader analysis and
in images recorded with a simple digital camera. The blue-to-green
ratio decreased again at sAxl concentrations exceeding 3 nM due to
the “hook” effect, which occurs when the sensor components
bind to distinct sAxl proteins, prohibiting the complementation of
NLuc. As expected, AB-RAPPID, comprising the two antibodies binding
to the Ig-like repeats of Axl, did not show any increase in blue luminescence
(Figure d). This lack
of response is caused by the overlapping binding sites of the antibodies,
impeding the binding of two sensor components to the same sAxl protein.[22] We also tested several combinations of FNIII-
and Ig-binders. All four sensors (AD-RAPPID, AC-RAPPID, BD-RAPPID,
and BC-RAPPID) displayed an increase in blue-to-green ratio upon increasing
concentrations of sAxl and exhibited LODs of 63, 90, 21, and 360 pM,
respectively (Figure e,f and Table ).
The RAPPID assays containing the high-affinity antibody D showed higher
relative responses and lower LODs, demonstrating the importance of
having at least one high-affinity antibody in the sensor format. Nevertheless,
the CD-RAPPID assay, combining antibodies targeting the FN1 and FN2
domains, exhibited the highest maximal change in emission ratio, suggesting
that adjacent but nonoverlapping binding sites contribute to more
efficient NLuc complementation. We therefore chose CD-RAPPID for subsequent
measurements in blood plasma.[37,38]
Figure 2
Development of sAxl-RAPPID
assays. (a) SB or LB are covalently
coupled to the four anti-Axl antibodies through protein G (Gx)-based
photoconjugation. The photoreactive unnatural amino acid p-benzoylphenylalanine (pBpA) in Gx generates a covalent
bond with the Fc-domain of the antibody upon irradiation with UV light
(λ = 365 nm). (b) Nonreducing SDS-PAGE gel analysis of the photoconjugation
of the four IgG1 anti-Axl antibodies to Gx-LB and Gx-SB. (c) Schematic
overview of the sAxl-RAPPID, consisting of 1 nM antibody-SB, 1 nM
antibody-LB, and 1–20 pM of calibrator luciferase. sAxl binding
results in reconstituted NLuc and the increased emission of blue light.
(d) Performance of the RAPPID assay consisting of C-SB with D-LB (with
20 pM calibrator luciferase), measured both with a plate reader and
digital camera, and the dose–response curve of the RAPPID A-SB
with B-LB monitored with a plate reader (with 1 pM calibrator luciferase).
(e) Performance of antibody combinations A-SB with D-LB (with 7 pM
calibrator luciferase) and A-SB with C-LB (with 5 pM calibrator luciferase).
(f) Dose–response curves of D-SB with B-LB (with 24 pM calibrator
luciferase) and C-SB with B-LB (with 2 pM calibrator luciferase).
All luminescent assays were performed in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA)
with 1500-fold diluted NLuc substrate. Blue-to-green ratios were calculated
by dividing the emission at 458 nm by the emission at 518 nm. Gray
and brown lines represent healthy sAxl concentration (∼0.5
nM) and sAxl concentrations associated with early HCC (∼1 nM),
respectively. Individual data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations of the analyte) are represented
by circles, and dashed lines connect mean values.
Development of sAxl-RAPPID
assays. (a) SB or LB are covalently
coupled to the four anti-Axl antibodies through protein G (Gx)-based
photoconjugation. The photoreactive unnatural amino acid p-benzoylphenylalanine (pBpA) in Gx generates a covalent
bond with the Fc-domain of the antibody upon irradiation with UV light
(λ = 365 nm). (b) Nonreducing SDS-PAGE gel analysis of the photoconjugation
of the four IgG1 anti-Axl antibodies to Gx-LB and Gx-SB. (c) Schematic
overview of the sAxl-RAPPID, consisting of 1 nM antibody-SB, 1 nM
antibody-LB, and 1–20 pM of calibrator luciferase. sAxl binding
results in reconstituted NLuc and the increased emission of blue light.
(d) Performance of the RAPPID assay consisting of C-SB with D-LB (with
20 pM calibrator luciferase), measured both with a plate reader and
digital camera, and the dose–response curve of the RAPPID A-SB
with B-LB monitored with a plate reader (with 1 pM calibrator luciferase).
(e) Performance of antibody combinations A-SB with D-LB (with 7 pM
calibrator luciferase) and A-SB with C-LB (with 5 pM calibrator luciferase).
(f) Dose–response curves of D-SB with B-LB (with 24 pM calibrator
luciferase) and C-SB with B-LB (with 2 pM calibrator luciferase).
All luminescent assays were performed in PBS (pH 7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA)
with 1500-fold diluted NLuc substrate. Blue-to-green ratios were calculated
by dividing the emission at 458 nm by the emission at 518 nm. Gray
and brown lines represent healthy sAxl concentration (∼0.5
nM) and sAxl concentrations associated with early HCC (∼1 nM),
respectively. Individual data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations of the analyte) are represented
by circles, and dashed lines connect mean values.
sAxl Detection in Human Blood Plasma
To demonstrate
the potential of the CD-RAPPID sensor for diagnosing HCC, we employed
the sensor to measure therapeutically relevant concentrations of sAxl
in human blood plasma. The high sensitivity of the RAPPID sensor allowed
for 5-fold sample dilution, reducing potential matrix effects such
as absorption of blue light by biliverdin.[32,37] Using 1 nM of both sensor components and 8 pM calibrator luciferase,
increasing amounts of sAxl were added to 20% human blood plasma and
a dose–response curve with a two-fold maximal change in emission
ratio was observed (Figure a). Please note that in this case the plasma already contained
approximately 0.5 nM sAxl, resulting in a background of 0.1 nM sAxl
in the final assay and reducing the maximal change in emission ratio.
The sensor was responsive in the physiologically relevant low nanomolar
concentration range and exhibited a LOD, after correcting for the
5-fold dilution, of 73 pM in 20% plasma. The additional 0.1 and 0.186
nM increase in sAxl concentration, corresponding to the 1 and 1.43
nM plasma concentrations of Axl in early and late HCC, respectively,
could clearly be distinguished from the background level of sAxl present
in normal plasma. Next, we spiked known concentrations of sAxl in
human blood plasma and applied the RAPPID sensor to measure the corresponding
blue-to-green ratios. Accordingly, four different sAxl concentrations
(0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 3.0 nM) were added to 4 μL plasma samples
and diluted 5-fold in the sensor mixture. The calibration curve in Figure a was subsequently
used to translate the blue-to-green ratios measured in the spiked
plasma samples to sAxl concentrations. After correction for the five-fold
dilution, we compared the results obtained with the RAPPID sensor
to the known spiked sAxl concentrations and found a good correlation
(Pearson’s r = 0.994) and a recovery between
92 ± 2 and 109 ± 6% (Figures S5 and 3b, respectively). Together, these results
show that the intrinsic ratiometric detection of the sensor results
in excellent reproducibility, enabling the reliable detection of small
differences in both target analyte concentrations and emission ratios.
Figure 3
Detection
of blood plasma sAxl levels associated with early and
late HCC. (a) Calibration curve in 20% plasma, diluted with PBS (pH
7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA). A final concentration of 1 nM C-SB, 1 nM D-LB,
8 pM calibrator luciferase, and 400× diluted NLuc substrate was
added. Concentrations related to early HCC and late HCC are presented
as a, respectively, 0.5 nM increase and 0.93 nM increase and corrected
for 5-fold dilution (0.1 and 0.186 nM increase, respectively). The
black line represents a linear curve that was fit through the linear
part of the data. Individual data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations of the analyte) are represented
by circles. (b) Comparison between the known spiked concentration
of sAxl and the concentration measured with CD-RAPPID, by making use
of the blue-to-green ratios of the calibration curve in (a). The curve
corresponding to the data can be found in Figure S5. Data in the table represent mean values ± s.d. from
technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations
of the analyte.
Detection
of blood plasma sAxl levels associated with early and
late HCC. (a) Calibration curve in 20% plasma, diluted with PBS (pH
7.4, 0.1% (w/v) BSA). A final concentration of 1 nM C-SB, 1 nM D-LB,
8 pM calibrator luciferase, and 400× diluted NLuc substrate was
added. Concentrations related to early HCC and late HCC are presented
as a, respectively, 0.5 nM increase and 0.93 nM increase and corrected
for 5-fold dilution (0.1 and 0.186 nM increase, respectively). The
black line represents a linear curve that was fit through the linear
part of the data. Individual data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations of the analyte) are represented
by circles. (b) Comparison between the known spiked concentration
of sAxl and the concentration measured with CD-RAPPID, by making use
of the blue-to-green ratios of the calibration curve in (a). The curve
corresponding to the data can be found in Figure S5. Data in the table represent mean values ± s.d. from
technical replicates, with n = 3 independent preparations
of the analyte.
Detection of Shedded sAxl
in Cell Culture Medium
sAxl
can appear in blood plasma as a result of proteolytic cleavage of
cell surface Axl by metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17.[39,40] Shedding of the ectodomain of Axl and the subsequent elevated release
of sAxl have been associated with several other types of cancer, including
renal carcinoma[41] and melanoma.[42] To investigate if RAPPID can be used to measure
shedding of cell surface Axl, we applied the CD-RAPPID sensor to measure
the presence of sAxl in the medium of Axl-expressing cell lines. The
culture medium from two Axl-expressing cancer cell lines (A431 and
HeLa) and one Axl-negative control cell line (HEK293) were collected.
Following 1 h incubation with 0.6 nM sensor mixture and 2 pM calibrator
luciferase, substrate was added and the ratio of blue and green luminescence
was measured (Figure a). Medium collected from A431 and HeLa cells displayed an increased
blue-to-green ratio compared to fresh RPMI and DMEM culture medium
controls, implying the presence of shedded Axl (Figure b). As expected, the cell medium harvested
from the HEK293 cells did not display this increase in blue-to-green
ratio after incubation with the RAPPID sensor mixture, confirming
the absence of Axl shedding. These results illustrate that the RAPPID
sensor provides an attractive tool to monitor receptor shedding and
identify cells that are subjected to this type of proteolytic cleavage.
Figure 4
Detection
of shedded Axl in cell culture medium. (a) Schematic
representation of the CD-RAPPID assay for the detection of sAxl in
medium of Axl-expressing cell lines. Medium from A431 (RPMI), HeLa
and Hek293 cells (DMEM) were collected and diluted with PBS (pH 7.4,
0.1% (w/v) BSA) and sensor mixture (1 nM D-LB, 1 nM C-SB and 2 pM
calibrator luciferase) to a final medium concentration of 10%. Before
the addition of 1500-fold diluted NLuc substrate, the mixture was
incubated for 1 h at room temperature. (b) Ratiometric detection of
sAxl in cell medium collected from A431, HeLa, and HEK293 cells. Ratios
for DMEM and RPMI represent controls of fresh culture medium. Bars
in the histogram represent mean values ± s.d. from technical
replicates, with n = 3.
Detection
of shedded Axl in cell culture medium. (a) Schematic
representation of the CD-RAPPID assay for the detection of sAxl in
medium of Axl-expressing cell lines. Medium from A431 (RPMI), HeLa
and Hek293 cells (DMEM) were collected and diluted with PBS (pH 7.4,
0.1% (w/v) BSA) and sensor mixture (1 nM D-LB, 1 nM C-SB and 2 pM
calibrator luciferase) to a final medium concentration of 10%. Before
the addition of 1500-fold diluted NLuc substrate, the mixture was
incubated for 1 h at room temperature. (b) Ratiometric detection of
sAxl in cell medium collected from A431, HeLa, and HEK293 cells. Ratios
for DMEM and RPMI represent controls of fresh culture medium. Bars
in the histogram represent mean values ± s.d. from technical
replicates, with n = 3.
RAPPID for the Detection of Cell Surface Receptors
Cell
surface receptors such as Axl and the epidermal growth factor
receptor (EGFR) are overexpressed in several types of cancers and
therapeutic treatments that target these receptors are currently used
in clinical care.[43−49] Therefore, the detection of these receptors is important for treatment
decision making and informs on disease progression. RAPPID could provide
an easy and cheap alternative for currently used analysis methods
such as FACS, which requires access to advanced flow cytometry equipment.
Accordingly, we analyzed whether RAPPID allows distinction of different
tumor cell lines based on the overexpression of Axl and EGFR. To allow
the detection of cell surface Axl, we first dissociated adhesive Axl-expressing
A431 cancer cells or HEK293 control cells and washed the cells with
PBS to prevent the detection of shedded Axl. Subsequently, the sensor
mixture, consisting of CD-RAPPID and 10 pM of calibrator luciferase,
was incubated with an increasing amount of either A431 or HEK293 cells
(Figure a). When Axl
is displayed on the membrane of cells, the antibody-luciferase conjugates
can bind and subsequently emit blue light as a result of NLuc reconstitution. Figure b shows that increasing
the number of A431 cells induced a higher blue-to-green ratio, suggesting
an elevated amount of Axl in the mixture. Increasing the amount of
HEK293 cells did not cause a change in emission ratio, confirming
the absence of cell surface Axl.
Figure 5
RAPPID assay for the detection of cell
surface receptors. (a) Axl-expressing
A431 cancer cells and HEK293 control cells were released from the
culture flask using trypsin and subsequently incubated with 10 pM
calibrator luciferase, D-LB, and C-SB (0.75 nM each) to allow complex
formation with the cell surface receptor Axl. (b) Response curves
of CD-RAPPID to an increasing number of A431 or HEK293 cells. Individual
data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent
dilutions of the cells) are represented by circles, and dashed lines
connect mean values. (c) CTX-mNG-SB, CTX-LB, D-LB, and C-SB (0.25
nM of the EGFR RAPPID and 0.6 nM of the Axl RAPPID) are incubated
with A431, HeLa, and HEK293 cells. The presence of EGFR on the cellular
membrane induces the emission of green light, while Axl binding produces
a blue light signal. (d) Luminescent response to increasing amounts
of cells. Blue (λ = 458 nm) and green (λ = 518 nm) bioluminescent
signals were monitored on a plate reader and normalized for background
light emission. (e) AND-gate RAPPID, with 0.6 nM CTX-LB, 0.6 nM D-SB
and 5 pM calibrator luciferase, producing light only in the presence
of both EGFR and Axl. (f) Sensor response to an increase in A431,
HEK293, or HeLa cells. All experiments were executed in PBS (pH 7.4,
0.1% (w/v) BSA). Bars in the histograms represent mean values ±
s.d., from technical replicates, with n = 3 independent
dilutions of the cells.
RAPPID assay for the detection of cell
surface receptors. (a) Axl-expressing
A431 cancer cells and HEK293 control cells were released from the
culture flask using trypsin and subsequently incubated with 10 pM
calibrator luciferase, D-LB, and C-SB (0.75 nM each) to allow complex
formation with the cell surface receptor Axl. (b) Response curves
of CD-RAPPID to an increasing number of A431 or HEK293 cells. Individual
data points (technical replicates, with n = 3 independent
dilutions of the cells) are represented by circles, and dashed lines
connect mean values. (c) CTX-mNG-SB, CTX-LB, D-LB, and C-SB (0.25
nM of the EGFR RAPPID and 0.6 nM of the Axl RAPPID) are incubated
with A431, HeLa, and HEK293 cells. The presence of EGFR on the cellular
membrane induces the emission of green light, while Axl binding produces
a blue light signal. (d) Luminescent response to increasing amounts
of cells. Blue (λ = 458 nm) and green (λ = 518 nm) bioluminescent
signals were monitored on a plate reader and normalized for background
light emission. (e) AND-gate RAPPID, with 0.6 nM CTX-LB, 0.6 nM D-SB
and 5 pM calibrator luciferase, producing light only in the presence
of both EGFR and Axl. (f) Sensor response to an increase in A431,
HEK293, or HeLa cells. All experiments were executed in PBS (pH 7.4,
0.1% (w/v) BSA). Bars in the histograms represent mean values ±
s.d., from technical replicates, with n = 3 independent
dilutions of the cells.To identify two different
cell surface receptors in parallel, we
next developed a new, green variant of RAPPID by introducing the green
fluorescent protein mNeonGreen (mNG) in the Gx-SB construct, generating
Gx-mNG-SB (Figure S2). Binding of antibody-conjugated
Gx-LB and Gx-mNG-SB to the target analyte induces bioluminescence
resonance energy transfer (BRET) between the restored split NLuc and
mNG, generating a green bioluminescent output signal (Figure S6). We applied this dual-color platform
to allow simultaneous detection of Axl and EGFR. EGFR is known to
be able to form ligand-independent homodimers, enabling the adjacent
binding of one antibody type to two distinct EGFR proteins and the
subsequent complementation of NLuc.[50−54] Accordingly, we photoconjugated Gx-mNG-SB and Gx-LB
to the EGFR-binding therapeutic antibody cetuximab (CTX, Figure S7) and Gx-LB and Gx-SB to anti-Axl D
and C, respectively. After incubating the EGFR-green and Axl-blue
sensor components with A431, Hela, and HEK293 cells, the blue (458
nm) and green (518 nm) light output, corresponding to Axl and EGFR
binding, respectively, were measured using a plate reader (Figure c). An elevated blue
and green light signal was observed when increasing the amount of
A431 cells, consistent with the presence of both Axl and EGFR (Figure d). The dual-color
RAPPID assay with HeLa cells also showed an increase in blue and green
light, suggesting the presence of both Axl and EGFR. However, HeLa
cells display a lower EGFR and Axl density compared to A431 cells
(Figures S6 and S8, respectively).[55] Therefore, the response of the sensors with
the HeLa cells is smaller than with A431 cells and only occurs in
the presence of a large amount of cells. As expected, the HEK293 cells
did not display a change in either green or blue light when increasing
the number of cells, confirming the absence of both EGFR and Axl (Figures S6 and S8, respectively). Very similar
results were obtained when the green RAPPID was used for Axl detection
and the blue RAPPID for EGFR detection, demonstrating the ease of
exchanging readout modules (Figures S9 and S10).Finally, we explored whether a RAPPID sensor could be developed
that would only respond when both Axl and EGFR are expressed on the
same cell, thus representing a bioluminescent “AND-gate”
(Figure e). We photoconjugated
CTX and anti-Axl D to, respectively, Gx-LB and Gx-SB, and added an
increasing amount of A431, HeLa, or HEK293 cells in the presence of
5 pM calibrator luciferase. The A431 cells, overexpressing both Axl
and EGFR, display an increase in blue-to-green ratio (Figure f). HeLa cells have a lower
EGFR and Axl expression compared to A431 cells (Figures S6 and S8, respectively),[55] resulting in a relatively small increase in blue-to-green ratio.
HEK293 cells lack both required input receptors, precluding the reconstitution
of split NLuc and the corresponding increase in blue-to-green ratio.
Previous research has suggested that Axl and EGFR can form heterodimers
and that this interaction is associated with EGFR drug resistance
in several types of cancers.[56−61] Our data support that EGFR and Axl are in very close proximity on
the cellular membrane of A431 cells, as anti-Axl antibody D and CTX,
enabled by the semiflexible linkers that can span 10–15 nm,
can bind adjacent sites and produce blue light in the presence of
both input receptors. Collectively, these results illustrate that
RAPPID can be employed to detect Axl-expressing cells and that the
platform can be easily adapted to identify cells that display two
different cell surface receptors using dual-color RAPPID or AND-gate
RAPPID.
Conclusions
Herein, we developed
six RAPPID sensors and screened them for their
ability to discriminate between healthy sAxl levels and concentrations
associated with early HCC. The best-performing RAPPID sensor, with
a picomolar limit of detection and a >9-fold maximal change in
emission
ratio, was subsequently applied to successfully detect clinically
relevant sAxl concentrations in spiked blood plasma. In addition to
measuring (patho)physiological sAxl concentrations, the RAPPID sensors
can also be applied to identify cell lines that experience receptor
shedding and detect the concurrent presence of two cell surface proteins.
The broad scope of applications makes the RAPPID sensors attractive
tools for both point-of-care diagnostic purposes and in clinical decision
making. This can be envisioned by integrating the sAxl-RAPPID sensors
in low-cost microfluidic point-of-care cartridges or paper-based devices.
Furthermore, provided that suitable antibodies are available, the
newly developed green RAPPID assay allows the sensor platform to be
extended to measure other HCC-related biomarkers such as α-fetoprotein.
The dual-color multiplex detection of two biomarkers could further
increase sensitivity and specificity.The homogeneous nature
and intrinsic low background signal of the
RAPPID sensors eliminate the need for the washing steps currently
used in immunostaining. Additionally, the semiflexible linker of the
sensors can span distances between two domains within single protein
targets and even between different cell surface receptors. Hence,
the RAPPID sensors show potential for the fast and user-friendly multiplexed
detection of membrane biomarkers and might be utilized to measure
cancer-related cell surface receptors in tissue sections. Furthermore,
the bioluminescent signal of the sensors can be distinguished with
a plate reader or a simple digital camera, making the RAPPID platform
an attractive substitute to expensive and relatively complex cellular
detection techniques like FACS. In the future, this sensor platform
can be extended to allow measuring three membrane receptors simultaneously.
Accordingly, a triple-color readout system could be established by
developing a red-shifted RAPPID variant. Alternatively, the AND-gate
RAPPID could be expanded by introducing a tri-part system, comprising
two smaller and one larger NLuc fragment.[62,63] With these systems, other therapeutically relevant receptors like
HER2 could be included in the cellular screening process.[64,65] Furthermore, the current dual-color RAPPID prohibits the employment
of the green calibrator luciferase. Therefore, a red-shifted calibrator
luciferase could be introduced, enabling also robust ratiometric measurements
in multiplex assays.
Authors: Lauren Averett Byers; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Pierre Saintigny; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Li Shen; Youhong Fan; Uma Giri; Praveen K Tumula; Monique B Nilsson; Jayanthi Gudikote; Hai Tran; Robert J G Cardnell; David J Bearss; Steven L Warner; Jason M Foulks; Steven B Kanner; Varsha Gandhi; Nancy Krett; Steven T Rosen; Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; George R Blumenschein; J Jack Lee; Scott M Lippman; K Kian Ang; Gordon B Mills; Waun K Hong; John N Weinstein; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kevin R Coombes; John D Minna; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Christine Gjerdrum; Crina Tiron; Torill Høiby; Ingunn Stefansson; Hallvard Haugen; Tone Sandal; Karin Collett; Shan Li; Emmet McCormack; Bjørn Tore Gjertsen; David R Micklem; Lars A Akslen; Carlotta Glackin; James B Lorens Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-12-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P Carter; L Presta; C M Gorman; J B Ridgway; D Henner; W L Wong; A M Rowland; C Kotts; M E Carver; H M Shepard Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-05-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jason W Chin; Stephen W Santoro; Andrew B Martin; David S King; Lei Wang; Peter G Schultz Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2002-08-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Mirko Dengler; Katharina Staufer; Heidemarie Huber; Rudolf Stauber; Heike Bantel; Karl Heinz Weiss; Patrick Starlinger; Hannelore Pock; Petra Klöters-Plachky; Daniel N Gotthardt; Peter Rauch; Carolin Lackner; Judith Stift; Christine Brostjan; Thomas Gruenberger; Takashi Kumada; Hidenori Toyoda; Toshifumi Tada; Thomas S Weiss; Michael Trauner; Wolfgang Mikulits Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-07-11
Authors: Yan Ni; Bas J H M Rosier; Eva A van Aalen; Eva T L Hanckmann; Lieuwe Biewenga; Anna-Maria Makri Pistikou; Bart Timmermans; Chris Vu; Sophie Roos; Remco Arts; Wentao Li; Tom F A de Greef; Marcel M G J van Borren; Frank J M van Kuppeveld; Berend-Jan Bosch; Maarten Merkx Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 14.919