F Di Rocco1, A Gleizal2, A Szathmari2, P A Beuriat2, C Paulus2, C Mottolese2. 1. Inserm 1033, French Referral Center for Craniosynostosis, Pediatric Neurosurgery, université de Lyon, hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France. Electronic address: federico.dirocco@chu-lyon.fr. 2. Inserm 1033, French Referral Center for Craniosynostosis, Pediatric Neurosurgery, université de Lyon, hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scaphocephaly is usually defined as the deformation of the skull resulting from the premature fusion of the sagittal suture. It is the most common type of craniosynostosis, and can be easily recognized on simple clinical examination. Its pathophysiology is easy to understand and to confirm on neuroradiological examination. In contrast, surgical indications are still somewhat controversial, the dispute mainly concerning therapeutic versus esthetic objectives. In recent years, however, several studies have challenged these basic and relatively simplistic interpretations of the pathophysiology of the condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the heterogeneity of scaphocephaly, we reviewed cases of scaphocephaly operated on at the Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Lyon University Hospital, France during a 10-year period (2008-2017) and performed a review of the literature on scaphocephaly and sagittal suture closure. RESULTS: During the 10-year period, 401 children were operated on for a scaphocephaly at the Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon University Hospital. Mean age at surgery was 1.14 years, for a median 0.7 years (range, 4 months to 8. 5 years). Several subtypes could be distinguished according to morphology, intracranial findings on imaging, patient age, and etiology associated to the sagittal synostosis. Two main surgical techniques were used to correct the malformation, depending on patient age, type of deformation and the surgeon's preference: cranial vault remodeling with occipital pole widening, with the patient in a prone position, and parietal enlargement with or without forehead remodeling, in dorsal decubitus. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity and heterogeneous nature of sagittal synostoses depend on different pathogenic mechanisms leading to and interfering with the skull abnormalities: abnormalities of CSF dynamics, possibly associated with systemic alterations, accounting for the varied postoperative morphological and functional course, in terms of cognitive impairment and late complications (notably intra-cranial pressure elevation). However, the real impact of such heterogeneous clinical presentations on surgical indications and surgical results remains to be elucidated.
BACKGROUND:Scaphocephaly is usually defined as the deformation of the skull resulting from the premature fusion of the sagittal suture. It is the most common type of craniosynostosis, and can be easily recognized on simple clinical examination. Its pathophysiology is easy to understand and to confirm on neuroradiological examination. In contrast, surgical indications are still somewhat controversial, the dispute mainly concerning therapeutic versus esthetic objectives. In recent years, however, several studies have challenged these basic and relatively simplistic interpretations of the pathophysiology of the condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To assess the heterogeneity of scaphocephaly, we reviewed cases of scaphocephaly operated on at the Hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, Lyon University Hospital, France during a 10-year period (2008-2017) and performed a review of the literature on scaphocephaly and sagittal suture closure. RESULTS: During the 10-year period, 401 children were operated on for a scaphocephaly at the Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon University Hospital. Mean age at surgery was 1.14 years, for a median 0.7 years (range, 4 months to 8. 5 years). Several subtypes could be distinguished according to morphology, intracranial findings on imaging, patient age, and etiology associated to the sagittal synostosis. Two main surgical techniques were used to correct the malformation, depending on patient age, type of deformation and the surgeon's preference: cranial vault remodeling with occipital pole widening, with the patient in a prone position, and parietal enlargement with or without forehead remodeling, in dorsal decubitus. CONCLUSIONS: The complexity and heterogeneous nature of sagittal synostoses depend on different pathogenic mechanisms leading to and interfering with the skull abnormalities: abnormalities of CSF dynamics, possibly associated with systemic alterations, accounting for the varied postoperative morphological and functional course, in terms of cognitive impairment and late complications (notably intra-cranial pressure elevation). However, the real impact of such heterogeneous clinical presentations on surgical indications and surgical results remains to be elucidated.
Authors: Jessica D Blum; Daniel Y Cho; Liana Cheung; Dillan F Villavisanis; Jinggang Ng; Jordan W Swanson; Scott P Bartlett; Jesse A Taylor Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 1.532