Marc R Safran1, Sara James Foard2, Kevin Robell3, W Michael Pullen4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, California, USA. 2. Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA. 3. Preventicx, San Diego, California, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Physical Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an increasingly recognized cause of hip pain in young athletes. Although there are multiple studies that describe the radiographic prevalence of FAI in athletes, its true incidence within this population is unknown. Purpose: To report on the overall and sport-specific incidence of symptomatic FAI in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes. Return-to-sport times were reported for patients treated operatively. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all reported hip injuries within a large, multisport NCAA Division I institution. Hip injuries were stratified into FAI, general pain/dysfunction, musculotendinous, ligament, bursitis, bone stress, contusion, and other. FAI was diagnosed based on history, physical examinations, imaging, and symptomatic relief after a diagnostic injection. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the overall and sport-specific incidence, and chi-square analysis was performed to identify contingency data. Results: In a 3-year period, a total of 5319 musculoskeletal injuries occurred in 1072 athletes. There were 491 (9.2%) hip injuries that occurred in 288 athletes, of which 40 injuries were FAI. The overall incidence of symptomatic FAI was 3.0% of the total population, 3.7% of all injured athletes, and 13.9% of athletic hip injuries. There were no statistically significant differences in FAI rates among male and female athletes overall or among male and female athletes within similar sports. Of the 19 athletes who were treated nonoperatively, 2 failed to return to play: 1 secondary to multiple musculoskeletal injuries and 1 related to cardiac issues. There were 21 hips in 20 patients that were treated operatively, with 1 athlete failing to return to sport. Return to play occurred at a mean of 202 days (range, 81-360 days) after hip arthroscopic surgery. Conclusion: In this large, multisport NCAA Division I cohort, the overall incidence of symptomatic FAI was 3.0% and represented 13.9% of hip injuries. The successful management of FAI with return to play was achieved by both nonoperative and operative treatment methods. The relatively low incidence of symptomatic FAI, despite reports of a high prevalence of FAI morphology in athletes, serves to emphasize the importance of clinical evaluations in treating patients with FAI.
Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is an increasingly recognized cause of hip pain in young athletes. Although there are multiple studies that describe the radiographic prevalence of FAI in athletes, its true incidence within this population is unknown. Purpose: To report on the overall and sport-specific incidence of symptomatic FAI in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletes. Return-to-sport times were reported for patients treated operatively. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted to identify all reported hip injuries within a large, multisport NCAA Division I institution. Hip injuries were stratified into FAI, general pain/dysfunction, musculotendinous, ligament, bursitis, bone stress, contusion, and other. FAI was diagnosed based on history, physical examinations, imaging, and symptomatic relief after a diagnostic injection. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the overall and sport-specific incidence, and chi-square analysis was performed to identify contingency data. Results: In a 3-year period, a total of 5319 musculoskeletal injuries occurred in 1072 athletes. There were 491 (9.2%) hip injuries that occurred in 288 athletes, of which 40 injuries were FAI. The overall incidence of symptomatic FAI was 3.0% of the total population, 3.7% of all injured athletes, and 13.9% of athletic hip injuries. There were no statistically significant differences in FAI rates among male and female athletes overall or among male and female athletes within similar sports. Of the 19 athletes who were treated nonoperatively, 2 failed to return to play: 1 secondary to multiple musculoskeletal injuries and 1 related to cardiac issues. There were 21 hips in 20 patients that were treated operatively, with 1 athlete failing to return to sport. Return to play occurred at a mean of 202 days (range, 81-360 days) after hip arthroscopic surgery. Conclusion: In this large, multisport NCAA Division I cohort, the overall incidence of symptomatic FAI was 3.0% and represented 13.9% of hip injuries. The successful management of FAI with return to play was achieved by both nonoperative and operative treatment methods. The relatively low incidence of symptomatic FAI, despite reports of a high prevalence of FAI morphology in athletes, serves to emphasize the importance of clinical evaluations in treating patients with FAI.
Hip and groin injuries account for 3% to 6% of injuries in young athletes.
Over the past decade, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has emerged as a
well-recognized cause of nonarthritic young adult hip pain.
FAI results from dynamic bone and soft tissue impingement secondary to
femoral head-neck junction abnormalities (cam type) and/or acetabular overcoverage
(pincer type), which can lead to damage to hip articular cartilage and/or the
acetabular labrum.
The management of these injuries continues to evolve, with the literature
demonstrating a global increase in arthroscopic treatment.
Outcomes from arthroscopic treatment have been promising, with studies
reporting high levels of patient satisfaction and return to sporting activities.There has recently been an increase in published studies describing the epidemiology
and, by proxy, the cause of FAI.
Early sport participation has been implicated as a risk factor for the
development of cam FAI, as morphological changes may occur to the developing
femoral head physis.
As such, there are an increasing number of studies that have investigated
the radiographic prevalence of these bony abnormalities in athletes among a
variety of sports.
Many of these studies, however, have focused on radiographic prevalence
within asymptomatic patients. Similarly, there are general population studies that
have described the overall prevalence of FAI morphology in the asymptomatic population.
Others have focused on the overall incidence of hip and groin injuries
based on athletic exposures.
There is, however, a paucity of reports that have described the incidence
of symptomatic FAI within the athletic population. Moreover, few reports have
attempted to determine the rate of symptomatic FAI based on factors such as sport
participation and sex.Therefore, the purpose of this study was to report on both the overall and
sport-specific incidence of symptomatic FAI in a large, multisport National
Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I institution. The ability to
return to sport was recorded for all patients, and the time to return was recorded
for patients treated operatively. Our hypothesis was that the return-to-sport rate
would be high in both nonoperatively and operatively treated athletes with
symptomatic FAI.
Methods
A retrospective review of electronic medical records over a 3-year period with
athletes having a minimum 1-year follow-up was performed. The medical
records of all athletes who sustained a musculoskeletal sport-related injury
were reviewed. Patients were identified for further chart review if they
sustained a hip injury during sport participation within the study period.
Data were then obtained to include sex, sport played when injured, treatment
performed, and outcome. The diagnosis of FAI was confirmed by history and
physical examinations by an orthopaedic surgeon (M.S.), consistent bony
morphology of FAI on plain radiography, and in most cases, magnetic
resonance arthrography that included an intra-articular injection of
anesthetic with more than 50% relief of pain.
Study Definitions
Hip Injury
For the purposes of this study, a hip injury was defined as
one that (1) was located in the hip joint, pelvis, groin,
thigh, and/or buttock; (2) occurred during an organized
practice or competition throughout the academic year
(traditional and nontraditional seasons); and (3) received
medical attention from a certified athletic trainer or
team physician.
Missed Time
For the purposes of this investigation, missed time was
defined as the number of calendar days that an injured
athlete was not allowed to participate in any organized
practice or competition within his or her respective
sport. Missed time included the number of calendar days
between the incident date and the calendar day on which
the athlete was medically cleared to return to play at a
level that allowed practice participation in his or her sport.
Similar Sports
For the purposes of this investigation, similar sports
implied intercollegiate sponsored sports that have both
male and female teams and have similar demands. The
following sports were considered similar sports during
this study: basketball, diving, fencing, rowing, soccer,
swimming, tennis, volleyball, and water polo. As the
result of different events and demands, gymnastics and
baseball/softball were not considered sex-similar
sports.
Data Collection
Data were collected from March 2009 to August 2013. Data were gathered
from the InjuryZone database (Presagia Sports) and electronic medical
records. We queried all musculoskeletal injuries that occurred in
athletes during the study period. We then identified all hip injuries,
as outlined above, and stratified them into the following categories:
FAI, general pain/dysfunction, musculotendinous, ligament, bursitis,
bone stress, contusion, and other. Nonspecific dysfunction included
the diagnoses of tightness, irritation, and spasm. Individual
participation on a sports team was utilized, and one athlete could
only participate on one team during the study.
Statistical Analysis
Excel 2010 (Microsoft) was used to analyze the raw data collected in this
investigation. Variables included for analysis in this study were sex,
sport, hip involved, date of presentation, date on which symptoms
began, treatment, date of follow-up, days of sport missed,
return-to-sport date, and diagnosis. For those who received cortisone
injection(s), the number received, timing, and response were noted.
For those undergoing surgical treatment, we analyzed the time from
symptoms to surgery, surgical treatment performed, and need for
microfracture. Descriptive statistics were used, with the incidence
for each respective sport determined. Where applicable, the chi-square
test was performed for contingency data.
Results
Among the 1332 student-athletes observed in this study, 1072 athletes (478
female and 594 male) sustained a total of 5319 musculoskeletal injuries
(2121 female and 3198 male). Overall, 491 (9.2%) hip injuries occurred in
288 student-athletes (131 female and 157 male) (Figure 1). Among the 288 athletes
who sustained a hip injury, 40 athletes were diagnosed with FAI,
representing an incidence of symptomatic FAI in 3.0% of all athletes, 3.7%
of injured athletes, and 13.9% of athletes who had hip injuries observed in
the study period. FAI represented 8.1% of all hip diagnoses observed during
the study period. FAI occurred in 21 female and 19 male patients. There was
no statistically significant difference between the rates of FAI among male
and female athletes by chi-square analysis. Moreover, no statistically
significant differences were detected between male and female athletes
participating in similar sports.
Figure 1.
Proportion of male and female athletes by type of hip injury (n =
491). Nonspecific dysfunction included tightness, irritation,
and spasm. “Other” included neuropathy, hernia, general
inflammation, and pain.
Proportion of male and female athletes by type of hip injury (n =
491). Nonspecific dysfunction included tightness, irritation,
and spasm. “Other” included neuropathy, hernia, general
inflammation, and pain.
FAI and Sport
Participation in each sport was evaluated to determine the percentage of
each team’s athletes who were affected by FAI (Figure 2). For this
calculation, each athlete was only counted one time during the study
period. Among the 40 patients who were diagnosed with FAI, 24 injuries
(15 male and 9 female) occurred in similar sports, but this difference
failed to reach statistical significance. Symptomatic FAI was
diagnosed among 21 sport teams, with men’s basketball representing the
greatest number (n = 7) and percentage (33.3%). At least 5% of the
team’s athletes in 8 sports were affected by FAI.
Figure 2.
Proportion of athletes affected by femoroacetabular
impingement by team sport. The sport roster includes the
total number of athletes over the study period. M, men’s;
W, women’s.
Proportion of athletes affected by femoroacetabular
impingement by team sport. The sport roster includes the
total number of athletes over the study period. M, men’s;
W, women’s.
Nonoperative Management of FAI
All athletes were initially treated nonoperatively, and this was the only
treatment method in 19 of 40 athletes after their diagnosis of FAI.
Nonoperative management consisted of formal physical therapy for
stability and therapeutic exercise interventions as well as transient
activity modification during episodes of increased symptoms. In
addition to formal physical therapy and activity modification, 27% of
athletes treated nonoperatively received an image-guided
corticosteroid injection. Injections were utilized if symptoms
persisted for approximately 10 weeks after the diagnosis and patients
failed physical therapy and activity modification. Those who did not
receive injections played with discomfort, played with modification,
and/or received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. We cannot
comment specifically on whether they were asymptomatic or able to play
with their symptoms. All 19 athletes treated only nonoperatively
underwent a physician follow-up within a mean of 13 months (range,
4-23 months) after their respective diagnosis date. There were no
athletes observed who were treated nonoperatively for their hip pain
(associated with FAI and/or labral abnormality) and missed any time
away from their respective sport. At the time of final follow-up, none
had undergone surgical treatment. There were 2 athletes who retired
from sports: one related to cardiac issues and one related to multiple
injuries, including his hip, shoulder, and ankle. The remaining 17 of
the 19 patients (89.5%) treated nonoperatively were able to return to
their previous level of sport. As such, nonoperative treatment only
resulted in a successful return-to-sport rate of 42.5% (17/40) after a
diagnosis of FAI.
Operative Management of FAI
A total of 21 hips in 20 patients (10 female and 10 male) failed
nonoperative treatment and underwent a surgical intervention with hip
arthroscopic surgery for persistent symptoms related to FAI. The mean
time from symptoms to surgery was 255 days (range, 25-495 days). We
found that 71% of those who underwent a surgical intervention waited
longer than 6 months before proceeding with a surgical intervention.
There were 7 (33.3%) hips that received at least one steroid injection
before the surgical intervention. Surgery consisted of acetabuloplasty
alone in 19% of hips, cam resection/femoral osteoplasty alone in 24%
of hips, and combined femoral and acetabular osteoplasty in 57% of
hips. Microfracture was performed in 5 cases (23.8%). The mean time
from injury to surgery was 267 days (range, 85-463 days) for patients
who required microfracture compared with 264 days (range, 25-495 days)
for those who did not require microfracture. Of the cases that
involved pincer-only management, 75% of those patients were female.
They demonstrated a mean chondral defect distance from the rim of 2.8
mm (range, 2-4 mm), and none required microfracture. Mixed-type
impingement occurred in 3 times as many male patients as female
patients. A total of 4205 days of sports participation were lost after
an arthroscopic intervention, averaging 202 days to recovery (range,
81-360 days). The overall return-to-sport rate was 95.2% (20/21). One
athlete, a female synchronized swimmer, returned to running, swimming,
hiking, and bouldering but did not return to synchronized swimming
because of issues unrelated to her hip. A male athlete who underwent
bilateral surgery did not return to his initial sport of crew but did
return to playing rugby.
Discussion
In this large, multisport cohort of NCAA Division I athletes, the overall
incidence of symptomatic FAI was 3.0% of all observed athletes and
represented 13.9% of hip-injured athletes. This rate is higher than what has
been presented in prior large epidemiology studies, which have reported 1.4%
of hip injuries in collegiate athletes.
Moreover, another large NCAA database study did not specify FAI but
identified 1 labral tear in an injury population of 1618 football players.
This large cohort study serves as one of the first studies to
identify the true incidence of symptomatic FAI among a mixed elite-level
athletic population.Multiple studies have reported on the radiographic prevalence of FAI and have
implicated sport participation in its development.
Siebenrock et al
investigated 72 hips in basketball players with age-matched controls
who did not participate in sports. They found that basketball players had a
higher prevalence of cam deformity, with 89% of athletes having an alpha
angle of >55° versus 9% of nonathlete controls. Larson and colleagues
identified radiographic evidence of FAI in 90% of collegiate football
players undergoing an evaluation before the National Football League (NFL)
Draft. Similarly, Nepple et al
identified radiographic evidence of FAI in 94.3% of hips evaluated in
football players at the NFL Combine. Looking at aquatic athletes, Langner et al
utilized magnetic resonance imaging and identified cam morphology in
67.5%, pincer morphology in 22.5%, and labral tears in >50% of patients
studied, despite only 15% of the patients seeking treatment for hip pain.
Still, others have identified radiographic markers of FAI to be present in
9% to 50% of the asymptomatic population.
Many of these studies, however, report the prevalence of FAI
radiographic markers but are unable to comment on the incidence of
symptomatic FAI within the population.In this study, we were able to identify the incidence of symptomatic FAI within
our study population. A large, multisport NCAA Division I cohort is an ideal
population to evaluate the incidence of FAI within the sport population.
First, it represents a class of elite, young adult athletes with a high
likelihood of early exposure to sports who are unlikely to have underlying
arthritis. Second, nearly all sport injuries are initially treated and
recorded within our health record system, functioning as a contained
population. Finally, given the variety of sports, it allows the opportunity
to risk-stratify across different sporting activities as well as allow for
comparisons between male and female athletes participating within similar
sports.In the current study, the men’s basketball team, with 33.3%, was identified as
having the largest percentage of symptomatic FAI for a team within our study
cohort. In contrast, we only found 2 football players who developed
symptomatic FAI during the study period. This finding could be caused by the
relative rest afforded by once-a-week play in football or, similar to other
injuries, failure to seek treatment because of the ability to compensate. It
is also possible that the higher incidence in our Division I basketball
players is related to accelerated adolescent growth, coupled with increased
overloading from early athletic activities in these typically taller
athletes. Another speculative possibility is that during this time period,
the basketball coach placed a strong emphasis on defense, and players were
frequently in a “defensive slide” position, placing the hip in flexion and
external rotation with side-to-side movements. Additionally, the strength
coaches could have put an emphasis on deep squats, deadlifts, and exercises
with lunges. This may have produced symptoms that otherwise would have
remained dormant, even in the setting of FAI morphology.While we are unable to specifically account for the stark differences between
the reported radiographic prevalence within the literature and the incidence
in our study, it does demonstrate the importance of correlative physical
examination results to imaging findings. Moreover, it supports the notion
that this is a dynamic problem and that while sport participation may lead
to radiographic markers consistent with FAI, it does not necessarily
correlate with the presentation of symptoms. To that end, based on our data,
we recommend an initial period of nonoperative treatment for the patient
with hip pain and FAI features, even in the elite athlete. However, if
symptoms persist, then surgery should be considered, as the duration of
symptoms has been a negative prognostic factor for return to elite-level play.Several studies have discussed the differences in FAI between male and female
patients. Shibata and colleagues
reported that male athletes were more likely to have mixed-type
impingement and that female athletes were more likely to have pincer-type
impingement. Nawabi et al
found that male sex was a risk factor for undergoing surgery in elite
athletes. In contrast, our study did not show any difference in the
incidence of FAI between male and female athletes, nor was there a
difference in those who went on to surgical management. We did note
morphology differences similar to Shibata et al,
with female patients having more frequent isolated pincer morphology
and male patients having more frequent mixed morphology. With that stated,
when compared within similar sports, we were unable to identify differences
in the incidence of symptomatic FAI between male and female athletes. As
such, this prompts the need for further investigation as to the impact of
sex on the development of FAI within the athletic population.Finally, an increasing body of evidence has developed regarding the treatment
of FAI in an athletic population. Both nonoperative and operative treatment
modalities have emerged, with authors recommending an individualized
approach to treatment.
Of our 40 patients diagnosed with FAI, 19 (47.5%) were treated
nonoperatively during their time as collegiate athletes. They did not have
any loss of time from sports documented, and only one athlete retired from
sport secondary, in part, to their hip injury. Similarly, 21 hips in 20
patients failed nonoperative treatment and were treated successfully with
arthroscopic management, with return to sport at a mean of 6.7 months after
surgery. All but one patient managed surgically were able to return to the
same level of sport or higher after surgical treatment. Therefore, with
proper patient selection, both nonoperative and operative treatment
modalities can achieve success in managing elite athletes. Further
longitudinal studies are needed to determine the long-term effect of both
nonoperative and operative management on the later development of hip
osteoarthritis.
Limitations
Several limitations exist with regard to this study. First, it is
retrospective and therefore limited in its design. To that end, we are
unable to comment on the radiographic prevalence of FAI within this
patient population and therefore unable to calculate the percentage of
patients who remain asymptomatic or to identify potential at-risk
athletes. Future prospective observational studies should be conducted
to better delineate the rate of conversion from asymptomatic FAI to
symptomatic FAI to help answer these questions. Second, this study
utilized a short observational time period (3 years) at a single
institution, with a relative short-term follow-up after treatment. A
longer observational period would likely provide the most
representative incidence data. However, our institution changed
reporting software after this time period, so a longer study period
was not available within this database. With that stated, we feel that
our large number of individual athletes (n = 1332) and high number of
musculoskeletal and hip injuries (n = 5319 and 491, respectively)
likely mitigate this risk.It is also possible that athletes developed symptomatic FAI that went
unreported within our system and/or they received treatment at an
outside facility. We think that this is unlikely, given the collegiate
athlete health program and the fact that if an athlete underwent
surgery elsewhere, they still would have had to be cleared by the lead
author (M.S.) to return to sport and thus be identified. Nonetheless,
this is still a small possibility and may lead to underreporting the
incidence of FAI or conversion to surgical treatment. Finally, not all
sports are represented at our institution, namely, the high FAI
prevalence sports of ice hockey and lacrosse, and therefore, this may
underrepresent the overall incidence of FAI within a collegiate
athlete population.
Conclusion
In this large, multisport NCAA Division I cohort, the overall incidence of
symptomatic FAI was 3.0% and represented 13.9% of hip injuries. This
represents the true incidence of symptomatic FAI within a contained
elite-level athlete population. Hip injuries represented 9.2% of all
musculoskeletal injuries within this cohort. The successful management of
FAI with return to play was achieved by both nonoperative and operative
treatment methods. The relatively low incidence of symptomatic FAI, despite
reports of a high prevalence of FAI morphology in athletes, serves to
emphasize the importance of clinical evaluations in treating patients with
FAI.
Authors: Hilal Maradit Kremers; Stephanie R Schilz; Holly K Van Houten; Jeph Herrin; Karl M Koenig; Kevin J Bozic; Daniel J Berry Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Jonathan M Frank; Joshua D Harris; Brandon J Erickson; William Slikker; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Michael J Salata; Shane J Nho Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Marco Yeung; Moin Khan; Verena M Schreiber; John Adamich; Shelby Letkemann; Nicole Simunovic; Mohit Bhandari; Volker Musahl; Marc J Philippon; Marc R Safran; Olufemi R Ayeni Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Michael P Reiman; Scott Peters; Jonathan Sylvain; Seth Hagymasi; Richard C Mather; Adam P Goode Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Justin L Makovicka; Anikar Chhabra; Karan A Patel; Sailesh V Tummala; David E Hartigan Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Christopher M Larson; Robby S Sikka; Matthew C Sardelli; J W Thomas Byrd; Bryan T Kelly; Rahul K Jain; M Russell Giveans Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2013-01-26 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Russell Lafrance; Richard Williams; Wes Madsen; Michael Maloney; Christopher Drinkwater; Brian Giordano Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2014-03