Literature DB >> 24660096

The prevalence of radiographic criteria of femoral acetabular impingement in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty surgery.

Russell Lafrance1, Richard Williams2, Wes Madsen3, Michael Maloney2, Christopher Drinkwater2, Brian Giordano2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pistol grip deformity of the proximal femur has been reported as a potential cause of hip pain and early-onset arthritis. The exact incidence of patients with osteoarthritis resulting from femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between radiographic markers of FAI in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of patients undergoing hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon over a 2-year period. The patients were divided by age, those younger than 65 years and (group A) and those 65 years and older (group B). The radiographs were evaluated for morphology consistent with FAI including an α angle >55°, crossover sign, coxa profunda, acetabular protrusio, and ischial spine sign. Three independent reviewers evaluated all the radiographs. The incidence of CAM, Pincer, and mixed deformities were compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: A total of 255 patients with 258 hip arthroplasties were included in this analysis. Group A was found to have a greater number of patients with CAM morphology. Linear regression analysis revealed that the α angle was greater in younger patients.
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing hip arthroplasty exhibit a high incidence of radiographic abnormalities consistent with FAI. The CAM-type morphology occurs more frequently in younger patients with advanced arthritis requiring hip arthroplasty. This morphology is thought to cause a delaminating injury to the cartilage of the acetabulum. This study supports the notion that CAM-type morphology is a risk factor for early development of degenerative arthritis of the hip.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAM-type morphology; femoral acetabular impingement; hip arthroplasty

Year:  2014        PMID: 24660096      PMCID: PMC3962054          DOI: 10.1177/2151458514522262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil        ISSN: 2151-4585


  16 in total

1.  Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Fabian Kalberer; Rafael J Sierra; Sanjeev S Madan; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Arthroscopic management of labral tears in the hip.

Authors:  Michael K Shindle; James E Voos; Shane J Nho; Benton E Heyworth; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; John C Carlisle; Paul E Beaulé; Young-Jo Kim; Robert T Trousdale; Rafael J Sierra; Michael Leunig; Perry L Schoenecker; Michael B Millis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R O Murray
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Hip morphology influences the pattern of damage to the acetabular cartilage: femoroacetabular impingement as a cause of early osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  M Beck; M Kalhor; M Leunig; R Ganz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-07

6.  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Kalesha Hack; Gina Di Primio; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Radiographic structural abnormalities associated with premature, natural hip-joint failure.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Michael A Dobson; Jason F Robison; Lucian C Warth; Jie Zheng; Steve S Liu; Tameem M Yehyawi; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Brandon B Park; Gregory J Stoddard; Jill A Erickson; Julia R Crim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Revision hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; David A Kuppersmith; R Brian Maxwell; Allston J Stubbs
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hip Preservation Surgery in Osteoarthritis Prevention: Potential Benefits of the Radiographic Angular Correction.

Authors:  José M Lamo-Espinosa; Adrián Alfonso; Elena Pascual; Jorge García-Ausín; Miguel Sánchez-Gordoa; Asier Blanco; Jorge Gómez-Álvarez; Mikel San-Julián
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-02

2.  Incidence of Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement: A 4-Year Study at a National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Institution.

Authors:  Marc R Safran; Sara James Foard; Kevin Robell; W Michael Pullen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 3.  The Natural History of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Alexander E Weber; David M Levy; Thomas H Wuerz
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-11-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.