| Literature DB >> 35427356 |
Estefenson Marques Morais1, Alex Ap Rosini Silva2, Francisco Wderson Araújo de Sousa1, Izabelle Maria Barboza de Azevedo1, Helane França Silva1, Alice Maria Gonçalves Santos1, José Evando Aguiar Beserra Júnior3, Caroline Pais de Carvalho4, Marcos Nogueira Eberlin4, Andreia M Porcari2, Francisca Diana da Silva Araújo1.
Abstract
The indiscriminate use of chemical pesticides increasingly harms the health of living beings and the environment. Thus, biological control carried out by microorganisms has gained prominence, since it consists of an environmentally friendly alternative to the use of pesticides for controlling plant diseases. Herein, we evaluated the potential role of endophytic Trichoderma strains isolated from forest species of the Cerrado-Caatinga ecotone as biological control agents of crop pathogenic fungi. Nineteen Trichoderma strains were used to assess the antagonistic activity by in vitro bioassays against the plant pathogens Colletotrichum truncatum, Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Macrophomina phaseolina, and Sclerotium delphinii isolated from soybean, cacao, fava bean, and black pepper crops, respectively. All Trichoderma strains demonstrated inhibitory activity on pathogen mycelial growth, with maximum percent inhibition of 70% against C. truncatum, 78% against L. theobromae, 78% against M. phaseolina, and 69% against S. delphinii. Crude methanol extracts (0.5 to 2.0 mg mL-1) of Trichoderma strains were able to inhibit the growth of C. truncatum, except Trichoderma sp. T3 (UFPIT06) and T. orientale (UFPIT09 and UFPIT17) at 0.5 mg mL-1, indicating that the endophytes employ a biocontrol mechanism related to antibiosis, together with multiple mechanisms. Discriminant metabolites of Trichoderma extracts were unveiled by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based metabolomics combined with principal component analysis (PCA), which included antifungal metabolites and molecules with other bioactivities. These results highlight the biocontrol potential of Trichoderma strains isolated from the Cerrado-Caatinga ecotone against crop pathogenic fungi, providing support for ongoing research on disease control in agriculture.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35427356 PMCID: PMC9012399 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.752
Fig 1In vitro percent inhibition of Trichoderma spp. isolates against C. truncatum (A), L. theobromae (B), M. phaseolina COUFPI 10 and COUFPI 11 (C), and S. delphinii COUFPI 209 and COUFPI 249 (D).
Averages followed by the same lowercase or capital letter are not significantly different by the Scott–Knott test at the 5% confidence level. The variation coefficients (CVs) were 4.67% for L. theobromae, 4.55% for M. phaseolina COUFPI 10, 5.96% for M. phaseolina COUFPI 11, 8.37% for S. delphinii COUFPI 209 and 6.02% for S. delphinii COUFPI 249.
Fig 2PC1 x PC2 (A) and PC1 x PC3 (B) score plots of metabolic fingerprints of Trichoderma spp. cultures generated using MetaboAnalyst, where Con = Control, UFPIT01 = T1, UFPIT02 = T2, UFPIT03 = T3, UFPIT04 = T4, UFPIT05 = T5, UFPIT06 = T6, UFPIT07 = T7, UFPIT08 = T8, UFPIT09 = T9, UFPIT10 = T10, UFPIT11 = T11, UFPIT12 = T12, UFPIT13 = T13, UFPIT14 = T14, UFPIT15 = T15, UFPIT16 = T16, UFPIT17 = T17, UFPIT18 = T18, and UFPIT19 = T19.
Secondary metabolites identified in Trichoderma strains using UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS.
| No. |
| Retention time (min) | Adduct | MS/MS Fragment masses | Molecular formula | Exact mass | Putative identification | Δ | Strains | Biological activity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 264.1086 | 0.68 | [M+H-H2O]+ | 69.0328, 84.0443, 139.0881, 150.9268 | C11H15N5O4 | 281.1119 | 2-O-Methyladenosine | 1.78 | All | Anti-inflammatory | [ |
| 2 | 118.0863 | 0.86 | [M+H]+ | 59.0705, 60.0838, 99.0061 | C5H11NO2 | 117.0790 | Glycine-Betaine | 0 | All | Plant growth promoter | [ |
| 3 | 138.0553 | 0.91 | [M+H]+ | 65.0380, 78.0338, 92.0496, 93.0572, 138.0562 | C7H7NO2 | 137.0480 | Trigonelline | -2,19 | UFPIT02-UFPIT05, UFPIT07-UFPIT11, and UFPIT13-UFPIT19 | Plant growth promoter, antibacterial | [ |
| 4 | 220.1196 | 4.63 | [M+H]+ | 97.0356 | C10H13N5O | 219.1123 | -1.37 | UFPIT06, UFPIT07, UFPIT10, and UFPIT12 | Plant growth promoter, antibacterial, antifungal | [ | |
| 5 | 237.1126 | 6.80 | [M+H-H2O]+ | 215.0709, 235.1137, 249.0980 | C13H18O5 | 254.1159 | Phomalone | -1.96 | All | Antibacterial, antifungal, cytotoxic | [ |
| 6 | 247.0957 | 10.34 | [M+H]+ | 56.9367, 162.0252, 166.0648 | C14H14O4 | 246.0895 | Columbianetin | -1.22 | UFPIT01, UFPIT02, UFPIT09, UFPIT14, UFPIT15, and UFPIT18 | Antibacterial, antifungal | [ |
| 7 | 265.1423 | 10.55 | [M+H]+ | 173.0774, 189.0489, 195.0886, 245.0917 | C15H20O4 | 264.1352 | Abscisic acid | 3,78 | UFPIT04, and UFPIT13 | Plant growth promoter, antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal | [ |
| 8 | 419.1713 | 10.83 | [M+H]+ | 186.0949, 204.1036, 441.1527 | C22H26O8 | 418.1640 | Syringaresinol | -2.87 | UFPIT01, UFPIT02, UFPIT13, UFPIT14, UFPIT15, and UFPIT18 | Antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory | [ |
| 9 | 281.1754 | 12.28 | [M+H]+ | 123.0814, 133.0655, 160.0524, 175.0431, 177.0254, 245.1556, 263.1660 | C16H24O4 | 280.1688 | Brefeldin-A | -4.64 | UFPIT03, UFPIT07, UFPIT10, UFPIT16, and UFPIT19 | Antiviral, antifungal, antitumoral | [ |
| 10 | 305.1721 | 13.93 | [M+Na]+ | 147.0131, 153.0918, 161.0294, 225.0098, 255.1513, 259.1615, 276.1381 | C16H26O4 | 282.1837 | Koninginin E | -2.13 | UFPIT03, UFPIT07, UFPIT10, UFPIT16, and UFPIT19 | Plant growth promoter, antifungal | [ |
| 11 | 307.1882 | 14.11 | [M+Na]+ | 133.0656, 267.1297, 289.1688 | C16H28O4 | 284.1993 | Koninginin A | -1.76 | UFPIT03, UFPIT07, UFPIT10, UFPIT16, and UFPIT19 | Plant growth promoter, Antifungal | [ |
| 12 | 453.1914 | 14.23 | [M+H-H2O]+ | 147.0929, 154.0670, 174.1137, 212.2395, 225.0931, 263.1654, 281.1769, 328.2860, 373.2012, 374.2914, 413.1963, 431.2048 | C26H30O8 | 470.1947 | Physodic acid | -1.28 | All | Antibacterial | [ |
| 13 | 447.2001 | 14.43 | [M+Na]+ | 215.0365, 233.0460, 263.0544, 285.1583, 303.1583, 429.1891, 447.1993 | C22H32O8 | 424.2110 | HT-2 Toxin | -3.07 | UFPIT07, and UFPIT10 | Mycotoxin | [ |
| 14 | 318.3013 | 16.01 | [M+H]+ | 97.9455, 150.0253, 264.2691, 282.2798, 286.2755, 294.2803 | C18H39NO3 | 317.2940 | Phytosphingosine | -3.15 | UFPIT01, UFPIT02, UFPIT09, and UFPIT17 | Anti-inflammatory, antibacterial | [ |
| 15 | 163.0393 | 16.54 | [M+H]+ | 120.9752, 121.0289, 135.0442, 163.0393 | C9H6O3 | 162.0321 | 4-Hydroxycoumarin | -2.47 | All | Antifungal, antibacterial, antioxidant, antitumoral | [ |
| 16 | 338.3413 | 20.72 | [M+H]+ | 97.1011, 100.0764, 109.1018, 111.0814, 114.0919, 121.1023, 123.0819, 125.0974, 128.1070, 135.1178, 139.0942 | C8H4O3 | 337.3341 | Erucamide | 1.19 | All | Antibacterial | [ |