| Literature DB >> 35421997 |
Liang-Liang Yan1,2, Mi-Rong Tang1,2, Xiao-Fu Dai1,2, Liang-Wan Chen1,2, Guan-Hua Fang3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual dysfunction after cardiac surgery can seriously affect patients' quality of life, but the impact of cardiac surgery on sexual function has long been neglected. Compared with conventional cardiac surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has the advantages of aesthetic appearance and no disruption of the sternal structure, which can greatly improve the patient's quality of life. However, studies focusing on the effects of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) on sexual function have not been reported. The objective of this research was to investigate the effects of totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery on health-related quality of life and sexual function in male patients and to provide possible recommendations.Entities:
Keywords: IIEF-5; Quality of life; Sexual dysfunction; Totally endoscopic mitral valve surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35421997 PMCID: PMC9008948 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-022-01814-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg ISSN: 1749-8090 Impact factor: 1.637
Demographic and Intra-operative data compared between two groups
| Item | MVS group | MIMVS group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual dysfunction | 30 | 15 | 0.03 |
| Age (years) | 45.25 ± 9.05 | 45.93 ± 9.90 | 0.71 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.53 ± 1.75 | 22.74 ± 1.48 | 0.50 |
| Marriage | 47 | 40 | 0.86 |
| Smoke | 22 | 15 | 0.46 |
| Hypertension | 8 | 10 | 0.35 |
| Diabetes | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| β-blocker | 50 | 39 | 0.47 |
| Pre-operative NYHA (median) | II | II | |
| Pre-operative LVEF (%) | 57.05 ± 5.86 | 58.30 ± 6.85 | 0.30 |
| 0.09 | |||
| Mitral valve repair | 35 | 21 | |
| Mitral valve replacement | 26 | 30 | |
| Tricuspid valve plasty | 20 | 19 | 0.48 |
| Post-operative LVEF (%) | 56.21 ± 5.40 | 55.20 ± 5.01 | 0.31 |
| Post-operative NYHA (median) | I | I | |
| Postoperative hospital stays (days) | 5.88 ± 0.94 | 4.87 ± 0.75 |
BMI body mass index, NYHA class New York Heart Association functional classification, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction
SF-36 scores were compared between the two groups after surgery
| Item | MVS group | MIMVS group | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning | 78.595 ± 8.1667 | 77.738 ± 8.4941 | 0.59 |
| Role physical | 71.31 ± 15.025 | 72.55 ± 15.211 | 0.67 |
| Bodily pain | 69.84 ± 12.449 | 75.88 ± 16.146 | 0.03 |
| General health | 63.03 ± 11.339 | 63.82 ± 13.914 | 0.74 |
| Vitality | 63.03 ± 11.339 | 63.33 ± 12.715 | 0.90 |
| Social functioning | 69.34 ± 11.512 | 69.70 ± 12.574 | 0.88 |
| Role emotional | 62.52 ± 13.084 | 65.57 ± 16.391 | 0.28 |
| Mental health | 68.79 ± 17.766 | 75.37 ± 14.094 | 0.03 |
The coefficient of rank correlation between the SF-36 scores and the IIEF-5 scores
| Scale | Coefficient of rank correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Physical functioning | 0.869 | |
| Role physical | 0.048 | 0.613 |
| Bodily pain | 0.066 | 0.490 |
| General health | 0.020 | 0.832 |
| Vitality | − 0.016 | 0.869 |
| Social functioning | − 0.002 | 0.983 |
| Role emotional | 0.019 | 0.842 |
| Mental health | 0.941 |
Correlation coefficients: 0–0.20 = ‘‘week’’; 0.21–0.40 = ‘‘fair’’; 0.41–0.60 = ‘‘moderate’’; 0.61–0.80 = ‘‘strong’’; 0.81–1.00 = ‘‘strongly correlation’’