Literature DB >> 30715347

Transthoracic clamp versus endoaortic balloon occlusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Paul Martin Rival1, Theresa H M Moore2, Alexandra McAleenan3, Hamish Hamilton1, Zachary Du Toit1, Enoch Akowuah4, Gianni D Angelini5, Hunaid A Vohra5.   

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine outcomes following aortic occlusion with the transthoracic clamp (TTC) versus endoaortic balloon occlusion (EABO) in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. A subgroup analysis compares TTC to EABO with femoral cannulation separately from EABO with aortic cannulation. We searched Medline and Embase up to December 2018. Two people independently and in duplicate screened title and abstracts, full-text reports, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for non-randomized studies. We identified 1564 reports from which 11 observational studies with 4181 participants met the inclusion criteria. We found no evidence of difference in the risk of postoperative death or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) between the 2 techniques. Evidence for a reduction in aortic dissection with TTC was found: 4 of 1590 for the TTC group vs 19 of 2492 for the EABO group [risk ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.93; P = 0.04]. There was no difference in aortic cross-clamp (AoX) time between TTC and EABO [mean difference (MD) -5.17 min, 95% CI -12.40 to 2.06; P = 0.16]. TTC was associated with a shorter AoX time compared to EABO with femoral cannulation (MD -9.26 min, 95% CI -17.00 to -1.52; P = 0.02). EABO with aortic cannulation was associated with a shorter AoX time compared to TTC (MD 7.77 min, 95% CI 3.29-12.26; P < 0.001). There was no difference in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time between TTC and EABO with aortic cannulation (MD -4.98 min, 95% CI -14.41 to 4.45; P = 0.3). TTC was associated with a shorter CPB time compared to EABO with femoral cannulation (MD -10.08 min, 95% CI -19.93 to -0.22; P = 0.05). Despite a higher risk of aortic dissection with EABO, the rates of survival and cerebrovascular accident across the 2 techniques are similar in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac surgery; Chitwood clamp; Endoaortic balloon occlusion; Meta-analysis; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve surgery; Systematic review; Transthoracic clamp

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30715347      PMCID: PMC6751412          DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  19 in total

1.  Direct aortic cannulation in minimally invasive mitral-valve operations.

Authors:  C Schmitz; O Ashraf; D Bimmel; A Welz
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Endovascular balloon versus transthoracic aortic clamping for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: impact on cerebral microemboli.

Authors:  Daniele Maselli; Raffaella Pizio; Gabriele Borelli; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-02-02

3.  Minimally invasive video-assisted mitral valve surgery: a 12-year, 2-center experience in 1178 patients.

Authors:  Paul Modi; Evelio Rodriguez; W Clark Hargrove; Ansar Hassan; Wilson Y Szeto; W Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-29       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paul Modi; Ansar Hassan; Walter Randolph Chitwood
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.191

5.  Clinical results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: endoaortic clamp versus external aortic clamp techniques.

Authors:  Fabio Ius; Enzo Mazzaro; Vincenzo Tursi; Giorgio Guzzi; Enrico Spagna; Luigi Vetrugno; Flavio Bassi; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2009-11

6.  The micro-mitral operation comparing the Port-Access technique and the transthoracic clamp technique.

Authors:  T Aybek; S Dogan; G Wimmer-Greinecker; K Westphal; A Mortiz
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.620

7.  Video and robotic-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a comparison of the Port-Access and transthoracic clamp techniques.

Authors:  Hermann Reichenspurner; Christian Detter; Tobias Deuse; Dieter H Boehm; Hendrik Treede; Bruno Reichart
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

9.  Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: external aortic clamp versus endoclamp techniques.

Authors:  Antonio Loforte; Giampaolo Luzi; Andrea Montalto; Federico Ranocchi; Vincenzo Polizzi; Fabio Sbaraglia; Paola Lilla Della Monica; Antonio Menichetti; Francesco Musumeci
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2010-11

10.  Transaortic endoclamp for mitral valve operation through right minithoracotomy in 369 patients.

Authors:  Donald D Glower; Bhargavi Desai
Journal:  Innovations (Phila)       Date:  2010-11
View more
  6 in total

1.  Mini-thoracotomy in redo mitral valve surgery: safety and efficacy of a standardized procedure.

Authors:  Filippo Prestipino; Riccardo D'Ascoli; Ádám Nagy; Gianluca Paternoster; Erica Manzan; Giampaolo Luzi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Impact of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery on sexual dysfunction in male patients.

Authors:  Liang-Liang Yan; Mi-Rong Tang; Xiao-Fu Dai; Liang-Wan Chen; Guan-Hua Fang
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 1.637

3.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic safety analysis.

Authors:  Kinsing Ko; Thom L de Kroon; Nabil Saouti; Bart P van Putte; Marco C Post; Johannes C Kelder; Karen F Schut
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10

Review 4.  BISMICS consensus statement: implementing a safe minimally invasive mitral programme in the UK healthcare setting.

Authors:  Hunaid A Vohra; M Yousuf Salmasi; Lueh Chien; Max Baghai; Ranjit Deshpande; Enoch Akowuah; Ishtiaq Ahmed; Michael Tolan; Toufan Bahrami; Steven Hunter; Joseph Zacharias
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10

5.  Long-term results of endoclamping in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery where external aortic clamping cannot be used - a propensity matched analysis.

Authors:  Ayse Cetinkaya; Emad Ebraheem; Karin Bramlage; Stefan Hein; Peter Bramlage; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Markus Schönburg; Manfred Richter
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 6.  In search of optimal cardioplegia for minimally invasive valve surgery.

Authors:  Sion Russell; Salman Butt; Hunaid A Vohra
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.581

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.