Literature DB >> 35421389

Coarse-grained modeling reveals the impact of supercoiling and loop length in DNA looping kinetics.

Charles H Starr1, Zev Bryant2, Andrew J Spakowitz3.   

Abstract

Measurements of protein-mediated DNA looping reveal that in vivo conditions favor the formation of loops shorter than those that occur in vitro, yet the precise physical mechanisms underlying this shift remain unclear. To understand the extent to which in vivo supercoiling may explain these shifts, we develop a theoretical model based on coarse-grained molecular simulation and analytical transition state theory, enabling us to map out looping energetics and kinetics as a function of two key biophysical parameters: superhelical density and loop length. We show that loops on the scale of a persistence length respond to supercoiling over a much wider range of superhelical densities and to a larger extent than longer loops. This effect arises from a tendency for loops to be centered on the plectonemic end region, which bends progressively more tightly with superhelical density. This trend reveals a mechanism by which supercoiling favors shorter loop lengths. In addition, our model predicts a complex kinetic response to supercoiling for a given loop length, governed by a competition between an enhanced rate of looping due to torsional buckling and a reduction in looping rate due to chain straightening as the plectoneme tightens at higher superhelical densities. Together, these effects lead to a flattening of the kinetic response to supercoiling within the physiological range for all but the shortest loops. Using experimental estimates for in vivo superhelical densities, we discuss our model's ability to explain available looping data, highlighting both the importance of supercoiling as a regulatory force in genetics and the additional complexities of looping phenomena in vivo.
Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35421389      PMCID: PMC9199097          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   3.699


  73 in total

1.  Dynamics of site juxtaposition in supercoiled DNA.

Authors:  J Huang; T Schlick; A Vologodskii
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Topoisomerase function during bacterial responses to environmental challenge.

Authors:  Shan Rui; Yuk-Ching Tse-Dinh
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2003-01-01

3.  Nonthermal ATP-dependent fluctuations contribute to the in vivo motion of chromosomal loci.

Authors:  Stephanie C Weber; Andrew J Spakowitz; Julie A Theriot
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large-Scale Conformational Transitions in Supercoiled DNA Revealed by Coarse-Grained Simulation.

Authors:  Brad A Krajina; Andrew J Spakowitz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Torsional and bending rigidity of the double helix from data on small DNA rings.

Authors:  M D Frank-Kamenetskii; A V Lukashin; V V Anshelevich; A V Vologodskii
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1985-02

6.  Designed architectural proteins that tune DNA looping in bacteria.

Authors:  David H Tse; Nicole A Becker; Robert T Young; Wilma K Olson; Justin P Peters; Tanya L Schwab; Karl J Clark; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 19.160

7.  Genomic transcriptional response to loss of chromosomal supercoiling in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brian J Peter; Javier Arsuaga; Adam M Breier; Arkady B Khodursky; Patrick O Brown; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Effects of nucleoid proteins on DNA repression loop formation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Nicole A Becker; Jason D Kahn; L James Maher
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  What controls DNA looping?

Authors:  Pamela J Perez; Nicolas Clauvelin; Michael A Grosner; Andrew V Colasanti; Wilma K Olson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Programmable DNA looping using engineered bivalent dCas9 complexes.

Authors:  Nan Hao; Keith E Shearwin; Ian B Dodd
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.