| Literature DB >> 35415072 |
Haoruo Jia1, Xiao Lin2, Dong Wang1, Jingwei Wang3, Qiliang Shang1, Xin He3,4, Kang Wu2, Boyan Zhao5, Pandi Peng6, Han Wang1, Di Wang1, Pan Li1,7, Liu Yang1,7, Zhuojing Luo1,7, Lei Yang2,8.
Abstract
Background/Objective: Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration (IVDD) that greatly affected by regional biomechanical environment is a major cause of low back pain. Injectable hydrogels have been commonly studied for treatment of IVDD due to their capability of mimicking extracellular matrix structure to support cellular behavior and clinical prospects in minimally invasive treatment. However, most hydrogels suffer from complicated chemistry, potential uncertainty and toxicity from in-situ gelation, and mismatch with IVD mechanical environment that limit their therapeutic effects or clinical translation in IVDD or intervertebral disc defect repair. For IVD lesion repair, the study aims to develop a novel hydrogel with shear-thinning enabled injectability, high bio-safety, and mechanical properties adaptable to the IVD environment, using a simple chemistry and method. And therapeutic efficacy of the novel hydrogel in the treatment of IVDD or intervertebral disc defect will be revealed.Entities:
Keywords: Biomechanical environment; Injectable hydrogel; Intervertebral disc degeneration; Low back pain; Nucleus pulposus discectomy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35415072 PMCID: PMC8980713 DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Translat ISSN: 2214-031X Impact factor: 5.191
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of the development of GPG, in vitro cell tests and in vivo animal study.
Fig. 1Preparation and characterization of GPG. (a) Schematic diagram showing the structure and the cross-linking mechanism of GPG. (b) FTIR spectra of PVA and GPG. (c) Photo showing the injectability of GPG through a 27 G syringe needle. (d) Quantification of contact angle measurement. The lower contact angle indicates a higher hydrophilicity.
Fig. 2Rheological and mechanical properties of GPG. (a) Dependence of G’, G’’ and the G”/G’ ratio of GPG on the frequency of oscillation in rheological test. (b) Stress–strain curves of the GPG at different compression cycles up to 100 cycles. Tests were performed at a maximum strain of 20% under the displacement rate of 10 mm min−1. (c) Photos of GPG sample before and after cyclic compression test. Scale = 5 mm. (d) Hydrogel sample recovered within 5 min post press. Scale = 2 mm.
Fig. 3Swelling capacity and network structure of GPG. (a) Photos of freeze-dried GPG samples after being placed into distilled water for various time periods. (b) Mass swelling ratio curves of pure PVA and GPG. (c) Volume swelling ratio curves of GPG. (d) SEM and (e) TEM images of freeze-dried GPG.
Fig. 4GPG protected NP vitality against pathologically hydrostatic and dynamic stresses. (a) NP cells were seeded on plates with or without GPG coating, then subjected to 1 MPa of hydrostatic stress. Live-dead staining was performed on the indicated timepoints. Red: Dead cells. (b) Proliferation curves were drawn according to cell counting on the indicated timepoints. (c) Cell viability assay: Quantification of the percentage of dead cells. (d) qRT-PCR results of Aggrecan, Col-II, Col-I, MMP-13 and ADAMTs-5 relative mRNA level of NP cells treated with 1 MPa of hydrostatic stress for 24 h. (e) Aggrecan, Collagen II and MMP-13 protein content of the NP cells treated with 1 MPa of hydrostatic stress for 24 h were detected by western blot. NP cells cultured in plates without GPG coating or loading stimulation were set as control. (f) NP cells were seeded on silicone chambers with or without GPG coating, then subjected to cyclic stretching with tensile strain of 20%, 0.2 Hz or 2%, 2 Hz respectively for 6 h. Live-dead staining was performed after the dynamic compression treatment. Red: Dead cells. (g) Cell counting was performed after dynamic compression treatment. (h) Cell viability assay: Quantification of the percentage of dead cells. (i) qRT-PCR results of Aggrecan, Col-II, Col-I, MMP-13 and ADAMTs-5 relative mRNA level of NP cells after dynamic compression treatment (j) Aggrecan, Collagen II and MMP-13 protein content of NP cells after dynamic compression treatment were detected by western blot. NP cells cultured in silicone chambers without GPG coating or loading stimulation were set as control. n = 3 per group per timepoint. Scale = 50 μm ∗: p < 0.01.
Fig. 5GPG preserved IVD height, CEP structure and water content in IDD and NPD models at 2 months after surgery. (a) Micro-CT images (Global view) of different groups in IDD models. (b) Magnified images of (a). (c) Quantification of IVD height of IDD models. (d) Micro-CT images (Global view) of different groups in NPD models. (e) Magnified images of (d). (f) Quantification of IVD height of NPD models. Red label: Destructed CEP. (g) MRI images (Global view) of different groups in IDD models. (h) Magnified images of (g). (i) Pfirrmann Grading of IDD models (j) MRI index of IDD models (k) MRI images (Global view) of different groups in NPD models (l) Magnified images of (k) (m) Pfirrmann Grading of NPD models (n) MRI index of NPD models. n = 5 per group per timepoint. Scale = 2 mm ∗: p < 0.01.
Fig. 6GPG stimulated tremelloid repair in IDD and fibrous repair in NPD models. (a) Safranin’ O staining of IVD at 2 weeks after IDD surgery. (b) Histological score of (a). (c) Safranin’ O staining of IVD at 2 months after IDD surgery. (d) Histological score of (c). (e) Safranin’ O staining of IVD at 2 weeks after NPD surgery. (f) Histological Score of (e). (g) Safranin’ O staining of IVD at 2 months after NPD surgery. (h) Histological Score of (g). n = 5 per group per timepoint. Scale = 200 μm ∗: p < 0.01.
Fig. 7GPG showed an ideal long-term therapeutic effect in IDD and NPD models at 6 months after surgery. (a) MRI images (Global view) of different groups in IDD models. (b) Magnified images of (a). (c) Pfirrmann Grading of IDD models. (d) Quantification of IVD height of IDD models. (e) MRI index of IDD models. (f) MRI images (Global view) of different groups in NPD models. (g) Magnified images of (f). (h) Pfirrmann Grading of NPD models. (i) Quantification of IVD height of NPD models (j) MRI index of NPD models. n = 5 per group. Scale = 2 mm ∗: p < 0.01.