Literature DB >> 25893360

Porosity and Thickness of the Vertebral Endplate Depend on Local Mechanical Loading.

Uruj Zehra1, Kate Robson-Brown, Michael A Adams, Patricia Dolan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Mechanical and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) study of cadaver spines.
OBJECTIVE: To compare porosity and thickness of vertebral endplates with (1) compressive stresses measured in adjacent intervertebral discs and (2) grade of disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Endplate porosity is important for disc metabolite transport, and yet porosity increases with age and disc degeneration. We hypothesize that porosity is largely determined by mechanical loading from adjacent discs.
METHODS: Forty motion segments (T8-9 to L4-5) were dissected from 23 cadavers aged 48 to 98 years. Each was subjected to 1 kN compression during which time intradiscal stresses were measured by pulling a pressure transducer along the disc's midsagittal diameter. "Stress profiles" revealed the average pressure in the nucleus, and the maximum stress in the anterior and posterior annulus. Specimens were further dissected to obtain discs with endplates (and 5 mm of bone) on either side. Microcomputed tomography scans (resolution 35 μm) were analyzed to calculate thickness and porosity in the midsagittal regions of all 80 endplates. Average values for the anterior, central, and posterior regions of each endplate were obtained. Disc degeneration was assessed macroscopically and microscopically.
RESULTS: Endplate porosity was inversely related to its thickness, being greatest in the central region opposite the nucleus, and least near the periphery. Superior endplates (relative to the disc) were 14% thicker (P < 0.001) and 4% less porous (P = 0.008) than inferior. In each of the 3 endplate regions (anterior, central, and posterior), porosity was inversely and significantly related to mechanical loading (pressure or maximum stress) in the adjacent disc region (P < 0.01 in all cases). Disc degeneration was best predicted by (reduced) nucleus pressure (R = 0.46, P < 0.001) and (reduced) maximum stress in the anterior annulus (R = 0.31, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Mechanical loading is a major determinant of endplate thickness and porosity. Disc degeneration is more closely related to reduced disc stresses than to endplate thickness or porosity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893360     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

1.  Rehydration of a degenerated disc on MRI synchronized with transition of Modic changes following stand-alone XLIF.

Authors:  Kenichiro Kita; Toshinori Sakai; Mitsunobu Abe; Yoichiro Takata; Koichi Sairyo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Association of vertebral endplate microstructure with bone strength in men and women.

Authors:  MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Is bone density associated with intervertebral disc pressure in healthy and degenerated discs?

Authors:  Paul M Fein; Alexander DelMonaco; Timothy M Jackman; Cameron Curtiss; Ali Guermazi; Glenn D Barest; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Staying connected: structural integration at the intervertebral disc-vertebra interface of human lumbar spines.

Authors:  Sharon Brown; Samantha Rodrigues; Christopher Sharp; Kelly Wade; Neil Broom; Iain W McCall; Sally Roberts
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Nutrient supply and nucleus pulposus cell function: effects of the transport properties of the cartilage endplate and potential implications for intradiscal biologic therapy.

Authors:  J Wong; S L Sampson; H Bell-Briones; A Ouyang; A A Lazar; J C Lotz; A J Fields
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Measuring the thickness of vertebral endplate and shell using digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Michael R Dix; Angela Xiao; Daniel J Oravec; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Mechanisms and clinical implications of intervertebral disc calcification.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Marianna Tryfonidou; James C Iatridis; Svenja Illien-Jünger; Fackson Mwale; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 32.286

8.  ISSLS PRIZE in Clinical Science 2022: Epidemiology, risk factors and clinical impact of juvenile Modic changes in paediatric patients with low back pain.

Authors:  G Michael Mallow; David Zepeda; Timothy G Kuzel; J Nicolas Barajas; Khaled Aboushaala; Michael T Nolte; Alejandro Espinoza-Orias; Chundo Oh; Matthew Colman; Monica Kogan; Frank M Phillips; Howard S An; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 9.  Intervertebral disc degeneration and regeneration: a motion segment perspective.

Authors:  B Ashinsky; H E Smith; R L Mauck; S E Gullbrand
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 3.942

10.  Spinopelvic alignment predicts disc calcification, displacement, and Modic changes: Evidence of an evolutionary etiology for clinically-relevant spinal phenotypes.

Authors:  Uruj Zehra; Jason P Y Cheung; Cora Bow; Rebecca J Crawford; Keith D K Luk; William Lu; Dino Samartzis
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-02-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.