| Literature DB >> 35411161 |
Banchlay Addis1, Workye Akele2, Amare Minyihun1.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Understanding potential demand and willingness to pay for the insecticide treated nets is important for sustainable insecticide-treated bed net intervention. However, there is limited evidence, and there is no study in this malarious area, so the study aimed to assess willingness to pay for insecticide-treated bed net and influencing factors.Entities:
Keywords: ITN; Tobit model; willingness to pay
Year: 2022 PMID: 35411161 PMCID: PMC8994694 DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S353999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ISSN: 1178-6981
Socio- Demographic, Economic and Individual Factors of Study Participants in Bugina District Northeast Ethiopia, 2020 (n=683)
| Variable | Description | Frequency n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Male | ||
| Female | ||
| ≤= 29 years | 130 (19.1) | |
| 30–39 years | 183 (26.9) | |
| 40–49 years | 176 (25.9) | |
| 50–59 years | 91 (13.4) | |
| 60 years and above | 100 (14.7) | |
| Orthodox | 670 (98.5) | |
| Muslim | 10 (1.5) | |
| Married | 577 (84.9) | |
| Unmarried | 103 (15.1) | |
| Not able to read and write | 293 (43.0) | |
| Able to read and write | 191 (28.1) | |
| Primary education (1–8) | 91 (13.4) | |
| Secondary school (9–12) | 77 (11.3) | |
| College and above | 26 (4.2) | |
| Farmer | 515 (75.7) | |
| Merchant | 5 (0.7) | |
| Housewife | 102 (15.1) | |
| Daily laborer | 19 (2.8) | |
| Student | 39 (5.7) | |
| ≤ 5 members | 505 (74.3) | |
| >5 members | 175 (25.7) | |
| Yes | 144 (21.1) | |
| No | 536 (78.9) | |
| Poor (1st quintile) | 227 (33.38) | |
| Medium (2nd quintile) | 227 (33.38) | |
| Rich (3rd quintile) | 226 (33.24) | |
| Less knowledgeable | 267 (39.2) | |
| Knowledgeable | 413 (60.7) | |
| Poor attitude | 304 (44.7) | |
| Good Attitude | 376 (55.29) | |
| Yes | 12 (1.7) | |
| No | 668 (98.3) | |
| Yes | 4 (0.6) | |
| No | 676 (99.4) | |
| Yes | 403 (59.3) | |
| No | 277 (40.7) |
Maximum Likelihood of Tobit Econometrical Analysis of Factors Associated with MWTP for Blue Rectangular ITN in Bugina District, 2020
| Variables | Beta Coefficient | P value | Beta Coefficient | 95% CI | Marginal Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 18–29 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 30–39 | 0.003 | 0.95 | 0.96 | −4.7 | 6.62 | 0.73 | |
| 40–49 | 0.66 | 0.22 | 3.16 | −2.76 | 9.09 | 1.58 | |
| 50–59 | 0.13 | 0.043 | 2.54 | −3.9 | 9.08 | 1.53 | |
| >60 | 0.07 | 0.224 | 3.79 | −0.86 | 1.24 | 2.27 | |
| Sex | Male | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| Female | −14.1 | 0.001 | −4.34 | −0.76 | −0.07 | −0.72 | |
| Marital status | Un married | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Married | 0.55 | 0.21 | 1.65 | −3.69 | 6.9 | 0.61 | |
| Education | Non-formal education | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Formal education | 6.5 | 0.002 | 7.68** | 3.33 | 12.02 | 3.58 | |
| Family size | < 5 members | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| > 5 members | 0.09 | 0.028 | −0.57 | −4.12 | 4.01 | −0.03 | |
| Knowledge | Poor knowledge | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Good knowledge | 7.6 | 0.001 | 7.23* | 3.64 | 10.81 | 3.84 | |
| Attitude | Bad attitude | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Good attitude | 10.5 | 0.001 | 3.27 | −0.92 | 7.47 | 1.19 | |
| Wealth index | Poor | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Medium | − 4.6 | 0.07 | −2.74 | −8.09 | 2.59 | 1.12 | |
| Rich | 7.4 | 0.001 | 7.97** | 3.92 | 12.03 | 3.49 | |
| Constant | 41.68 | 48.95 | |||||
Notes: **Significant with p-value ≤ 0.01; *Significant with p-value ≤ 0.05; Marginal effect (dy/dx) is for discrete change of variable from 0 to 1 (unit increase). N.B, blue rectangular medium size ITN was selected for Tobit Econometrics analysis purpose due to its preference by households/ its mean price is greater than both blue and white color medium size circular ITN.