| Literature DB >> 21766555 |
Frehywot Eshetu Gebresilassie1, Damen Haile Mariam.
Abstract
Promoting self-financing healthcare helps restore efficiency and equity to national health systems. This study was conducted in malaria-endemic areas of southern Ethiopia to assess the bednet possession of the community, determine the people's willingness-to-pay for insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs), and identify what factors influence it. The study provided relevant information for programme planners and policymakers for evidence-based decision-making. This quantitative cross-sectional community-based study was conducted in four selected malarious Kebeles of Arbaminch Zuria district using a pretested interview-administered structured questionnaire. In total, 982 household heads were interviewed. The community's willingness-to-pay was assessed by contingent valuation, technique using binary with follow-up method. The advantage, the distribution, and the payment mechanism were explained, and three different qualities of ITN were shown by constructing a hypothetical market scenario. Of the 982 respondents, 466 (47.5%) households had at least one functional bednet. Of 849 children aged less than five years in the 982 households, 185 (21.8%) slept under a net the night preceding the survey. The results of the study revealed that around 86% of the respondents were willing to buy ITNs. The average maximum willingness-to-pay for three different types of bednets was statistically different. The maximum amount the people were willing to pay was US$ 3.3 for a blue conical ITN, US$ 3.2 for a white conical one, and US$ 1.7 for a blue rectangular ITN. The community's willingness-to-pay was significantly affected by gender, educational status, perceived benefit of ITN, previous source of bednet, and characteristics of bednet. The results showed that a significant proportion of the community people were willing to pay for ITNs. Therefore, introducing a subsidized ITN market rather than free distribution for all should be considered to ensure sustainability and self-reliance in the prevention and control of malaria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21766555 PMCID: PMC3131120 DOI: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i3.7867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Willingness-to-pay characteristics of respondents in Arbaminch Zuria district, March 2006
| WTP characterstics | Socially-marketed blue conical ITN | Socially-marketed white conical ITN | Freely distributed blue rectangular ITN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Willing to buy ITN, no. (%) | 850 (86.5) | 846 (86.2) | 760 (77.4) |
| Average maximum WTP (US$) | 3.3 | 3.2 | 1.7 |
| Median maximum WTP (US$) | 3.1 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
ITN=Insecticide-treated bednet;
WTP=Willingness-to-pay
Fig. 1.Demand curve for maximum WTP for a blue conical socially-marketed ITN in Arbaminch Zuria district, March 2006
Fig. 3.Demand curve for maximum willingness-to-pay for a blue rectangular freelydistributed ITN in Arbaminch Zuria district, March 2006
Factors affecting individual's willingness-to-pay for ITN using binary logistic regression, Arbaminch Zuria district, March 2006
| Variable | No. | Crude OR (CI) | Adjusted OR (CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender of the respondent | |||
| Female | 339 | 0.47 (0.33-0.69) | 0.43 (0.2-0.9) |
| Male | 643 | 1 | |
| Occupation | |||
| Farmer | 632 | 1 | |
| Housewife | 160 | 0.55 (0.35-0.88) | |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 698 | 1 | |
| Single | 48 | 0.42 (0.26,0.66) | |
| Educational status | |||
| Illiterate | 439 | 1 | |
| Can read and write | 148 | 3.1 (1.6-5.9) | |
| Elementary school | 201 | 3.3 (1.8-5.9) | 3.48 (1.29-9.4) |
| Secondary school | 185 | 2.29 (1.34-3.9) | |
| Family-size | |||
| 4-6 | 516 | 0.63(0.4-0.9) | |
| >6 | 295 | 1 | |
| Farm-size holding (hectare) | |||
| No farm land | 201 | 1 | |
| <1.25 | 551 | 2.3 (1.1-4.8) | |
| ≥1.25 | 230 | 5.62 (2.7-11.5) | 5.3 (1.64-16.9) |
| Possession of radio | |||
| Yes | 721 | 2.8 (1.9-4.1) | |
| No | 261 | 1 | |
| Roof of house | |||
| Corrugated sheet | 707 | 1 | |
| Thatched roof | 270 | 0.47 (0.32-0.69) | |
| Knowledge on malaria | |||
| Less knowledgeable | 470 | 1 | |
| Knowledgeable | 510 | 1.76 (1.2-2.56) | |
| Benefit of ITN | |||
| Perceived | 944 | 3.79 (1.9,7.7) | 2.01 (1.7-6.9) |
| Not perceived | 38 | 1 | |
| Source of ITN | |||
| Freely given | 248 | 1 | |
| Bought | 218 | 3.4 (1.8-6.4) | 2.34 (1.1-5.2) |
| Number of ITNs in the house | |||
| 1-2 | 456 | 8.5 (2.8-26.2) | 48.9 (10.8-221) |
| ≥3 | 10 | 1 | |
| Last-night use | |||
| Yes | 400 | 4.83 (2.65-8.84) | 3.78 (1.78-8.0) |
| No | 66 | 1 |
The table shows only the significant responses;
CI=Confidence interval;
ITN=Insecticide-treated bednet;
OR=Odds ratio
Fig. 4.Mean willingness-to-pay for ITN versus estimated monthly income (ETB) (income elasticity of WTP), Arbaminch Zuria district, March 2006