| Literature DB >> 27403877 |
Stella Babalola1, Emily Ricotta1, Grace Awantang1, Nan Lewicky1, Hannah Koenker1, Michael Toso1.
Abstract
Malaria is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Liberia. At the same time, insecticide-treated net (ITN) ownership and use remain low. Access is a key determinant of ITN use but it is not the only one; prior studies have identified factors that affect the use of ITNs in households with at least one ITN. These factors operate at the individual, household, and community levels. However, studies have generally not assessed the psychosocial or ideational determinants of ITN use. Using 2014 household survey data, this manuscript examines the socio-demographic, ideational, household, and community factors associated with household member use of ITNs in Liberia. Multilevel modeling was used to assess fixed effects at the individual, household, and community levels, and random effects at the household and cluster levels. The data showed significant residual clustering at the household level, indicating that there were unmeasured factors operating at this level that are associated with ITN use. The association of age with ITN use was moderated by sex such that men, older children, and teenagers were less likely to sleep under an ITN compared to women and children under five years old. Female caregivers' perceived severity of malaria, perceived self-efficacy to detect a complicated case of malaria, and exposure to the "Take Cover" communication campaign were positively associated with ITN use by members of her household. The association with household size was negative, while the relationship with the number of ITNs was positive. Programs should seek to achieve universal coverage (that is, one ITN for every two household members) and promote the notion that everyone needs to sleep under an ITN every night. Programs should also seek to strengthen perceived severity of malaria and educate intended audience groups on the signs of malaria complications. Given the significance of residual clustering at the household level, interventions that engage men as heads of household and key decision-makers are relevant.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27403877 PMCID: PMC4942134 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Background characteristics of people in households with at least one ITN, Liberia 2014.
| Variable | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Age Group | ||
| 0–4 years | 611 | 26.9 |
| 5–17 years | 584 | 25.8 |
| Adult | 1074 | 47.3 |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 1123 | 49.5 |
| Female | 1146 | 50.5 |
| Female caregiver’s level of education | ||
| None | 1272 | 56.1 |
| Primary | 754 | 33.2 |
| Secondary and above | 243 | 10.7 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived norm about ITN use in their community | ||
| Perceived ITN use not to be the norm | 1593 | 70.2 |
| Perceived ITN use to be the norm | 676 | 29.8 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived susceptibility to malaria | ||
| Low | 519 | 22.9 |
| High | 1750 | 77.1 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived severity of malaria | ||
| Did not perceive severity | 732 | 32.3 |
| Perceived severity | 1537 | 67.7 |
| Female caregiver’s knowledge about malaria prevention | ||
| Low | 1780 | 78.4 |
| High | 489 | 21.6 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived self-efficacy to detect a complicated case of malaria | ||
| Low | 722 | 31.8 |
| High | 1547 | 68.2 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived self-efficacy to prevent malaria for self and children | ||
| Low | 440 | 19.4 |
| High | 1829 | 80.6 |
| Female caregiver’s exposure to “Take Cover” malaria prevention communication | ||
| Low | 964 | 42.5 |
| High | 1305 | 57.5 |
| Household wealth quintile | ||
| Lowest | 245 | 10.8 |
| Second | 274 | 12.1 |
| Middle | 482 | 21.2 |
| Fourth | 586 | 25.7 |
| Highest | 685 | 30.2 |
| Number of under-5 children in household | ||
| One | 1250 | 55.1 |
| Two | 671 | 29.6 |
| Three or more | 348 | 15.3 |
| Number of ITNs in household | ||
| One | 1209 | 53.3 |
| Two | 681 | 30.0 |
| Three or more | 379 | 15.7 |
| County of residence | ||
| Bong | 735 | 32.4 |
| Cape Mount | 604 | 26.6 |
| Grand Kru | 601 | 26.5 |
| Rivercess | 329 | 15.4 |
Results (odds ratio) of the multilevel modeling of the relationship between ITN use and selected individual, household, and community variables, Liberia 2014.
| Correlates | Empty Model | Full Model |
|---|---|---|
| Age Group | ||
| 0–4 years (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| 5–17 years | --- | 0.090 |
| Adult | --- | 0.428 |
| Sex | ||
| Male (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Female | --- | 0.772 |
| Interactions Sex/Age group | ||
| Male X Age group 0–4 (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Female X Age group 5–17 | --- | 1.828 |
| Female X Adult | --- | 2.783 |
| Female caregiver’s level of education | ||
| None (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Primary | --- | 0.978 |
| Secondary and above | --- | 0.739 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived norm about ITN use in the community | ||
| Perceived ITN use not to be the norm | --- | 1.00 |
| Perceived ITN use to be the norm | --- | 0.996 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived susceptibility to malaria | ||
| Low | --- | 1.00 |
| High | --- | 0.841 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived severity of malaria | ||
| Did not perceive severity | --- | 1.00 |
| Perceived severity | --- | 1.621 |
| Female caregiver’s knowledge about malaria prevention | ||
| Low | --- | 1.00 |
| High | --- | 1.323 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived self-efficacy to detect a complicated case of malaria | ||
| Low | --- | 1.00 |
| High | --- | 2.044 |
| Female caregiver’s perceived self-efficacy to prevent malaria for self and children | ||
| Low | --- | 1.00 |
| High | --- | 0.957 |
| Female caregiver’s exposure to “Take Cover” malaria prevention communication | ||
| Low | --- | 1.00 |
| High | --- | 1.902 |
| Household size | --- | 0.678 |
| Household wealth quintile | ||
| Lowest (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Second | --- | 1.301 |
| Third | --- | 1.919 |
| Fourth | --- | 1.766 |
| Highest | --- | 2.467 |
| Number of under-5 children in household | ||
| One (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Two | --- | 1.067 |
| Three or more | --- | 0.650 |
| Number of ITNs in household | ||
| One (RC) | --- | 1.00 |
| Two | --- | 6.862 |
| Three or more | --- | 13.330 |
| County of residence | ||
| Bong (RC) | 1.00 | |
| Cape Mount | 0.654 | |
| Grand Kru | 0.179 | |
| Rivercess | 0.476 | |
| Cluster level variance (SE) | 1.874 | 0.005 (.119) |
| Cluster-level ICC | .241 | 0.001 |
| Household level variance | 2.629 | 1.981 |
| Household-level ICC | .596 | .375 |
| Log likelihood | -1144.69 | -948.91 |
| AIC | 2297.39 | 1955.83 |
| Number of observations | 2269 | |
Notes
‡ p<0.1
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
*** p<0.001.
1 Model with no covariates
2 Model with covariates
3 Intra-class correlation