| Literature DB >> 35409696 |
Byoung-Jin Jeon1, Kang-Hyun Park2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Population aging is a reality in most developed countries. In this era, an important health issue for these countries is promoting health and quality of life in the elderly population. Older adults' social networks are associated with health and quality of life. Therefore, this study examines the association between the characteristics of social networks (friendship networks) and the subjective well-being of community-dwelling older adults.Entities:
Keywords: community-dwelling older adults; friend network; health; social network analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35409696 PMCID: PMC8997925 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic characteristics of the sample (N = 146).
| Sociodemographic Variables | Total Sample; |
|---|---|
| Age: mean (SD) | 75.31 (7.25) |
| Sex: | |
| Male | 35 (23.97) |
| Female | 111 (76.03) |
| Educational attainment: | |
| Elementary school | 42 (28.77) |
| Middle school | 19 (13.01) |
| High school | 5 (3.42) |
| College degree | 0 (0.00) |
| Other | 80 (54.80) |
Characteristics of health in the sample (N = 146).
| Characteristics of Health | Min | Max | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-rated health | 1 (very poor) | 5 (excellent) | 2.36 | 1.48 |
| Number of hospital visits per year | 0 | 30 | 12.07 | 8.425 |
Social network characteristics.
| Social Network Characteristics | Min | Max | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristics | In-degree | 0 | 6 | 1.420 | 1.617 |
| Out-degree | 0 | 6 | 4.600 | 1.195 | |
| Size | 0 | 10 | 5.620 | 1.898 | |
| Density | 0 | 1 | 0.103 | 0.168 | |
| Centrality | In-degree | 0 | 0.038 | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| Out-degree | 0 | 0.038 | 0.029 | 0.007 | |
| Size | 0 | 0.050 | 0.017 | 0.017 | |
| Density | 0 | 0.131 | 0.064 | 0.033 |
Squares = women who have high centrality; Triangles = men who have high centrality.
Social network characteristics and sociodemographic variables.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | t | Sig | B | t | Sig | ||
| Centrality | In-degree | −279.167 | −2.039 | 0.048 | −203.233 | −1.663 | 0.105 |
| Out-degree | 376.161 | 3.619 | 0.001 | 218.747 | 2.099 | 0.043 | |
| In-closeness | 201.825 | 2.562 | 0.014 | 170.075 | 2.357 | 0.024 | |
| Out-closeness | −52.650 | −2.145 | 0.038 | −45.084 | −1.975 | 0.056 | |
| Sociodemographic variables | Sex | 1.067 | 0.684 | 0.499 | |||
| Age | −0.165 | −1.825 | 0.076 | ||||
| Religion | −3.829 | −2.676 | 0.011 | ||||
| Education level | 0.440 | 2.409 | 0.021 | ||||
| Constant | 12.687 | 4.546 | 0.000 | 29.903 | 3.763 | 0.001 | |
| F | 4.811 ** | 5.666 *** | |||||
| R2 | 0.325 | 0.557 | |||||
** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.