Kayo Fujimoto1, Thomas W Valente. 1. Division of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. kayo.fujimoto@uth.tmc.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: Friendship networks are an important source of peer influence. However, existing network studies vary in terms of how they operationalize friendship and friend's influence on adolescent substance use. This study uses social network analysis to characterize three types of friendship relations: (1) mutual or reciprocated, (2) directional, and (3) intimate friends. We then examine the relative effects of each friendship type on adolescent drinking and smoking behavior. METHODS: Using a saturated sample from the Add Health data, a nationally representative sample of high school adolescents (N = 2,533 nested in 12 schools), we computed the level of exposure to drinking and smoking of friends using a network exposure model, and their association with individual drinking and smoking using fixed effect models. RESULTS: Results indicated that the influence from mutual or reciprocated type of friendship relations is stronger on adolescent substance use than directional, especially for smoking. Regarding the directionality of directional type of friendship relations, adolescents are equally influenced by both nominating and nominated friends on their drinking and smoking behavior. Results for intimate friends friendship relations indicated that the influence from "best friends" was weaker than the one from non-"best friends," which indicates that the order of friend nomination may not matter as much as nomination reciprocation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that considering different features of friendship relationships is important in evaluating friends' influence on adolescent substance use. Related policy implications are discussed.
PURPOSE: Friendship networks are an important source of peer influence. However, existing network studies vary in terms of how they operationalize friendship and friend's influence on adolescent substance use. This study uses social network analysis to characterize three types of friendship relations: (1) mutual or reciprocated, (2) directional, and (3) intimate friends. We then examine the relative effects of each friendship type on adolescent drinking and smoking behavior. METHODS: Using a saturated sample from the Add Health data, a nationally representative sample of high school adolescents (N = 2,533 nested in 12 schools), we computed the level of exposure to drinking and smoking of friends using a network exposure model, and their association with individual drinking and smoking using fixed effect models. RESULTS: Results indicated that the influence from mutual or reciprocated type of friendship relations is stronger on adolescent substance use than directional, especially for smoking. Regarding the directionality of directional type of friendship relations, adolescents are equally influenced by both nominating and nominated friends on their drinking and smoking behavior. Results for intimate friends friendship relations indicated that the influence from "best friends" was weaker than the one from non-"best friends," which indicates that the order of friend nomination may not matter as much as nomination reciprocation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that considering different features of friendship relationships is important in evaluating friends' influence on adolescent substance use. Related policy implications are discussed.
Authors: Grace C Huang; Jennifer B Unger; Daniel Soto; Kayo Fujimoto; Mary Ann Pentz; Maryalice Jordan-Marsh; Thomas W Valente Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Joan S Tucker; Kayla de la Haye; David P Kennedy; Harold D Green; Michael S Pollard Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-17 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Alene Kennedy-Hendricks; Heather L Schwartz; Beth Ann Griffin; Susan Burkhauser; Harold D Green; David P Kennedy; Craig Evan Pollack Journal: Health Place Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 4.078