| Literature DB >> 35409624 |
Hao Zhang1, Xuan Zhang1, Yan Wang1, Pengchu Bai1, Kazuichi Hayakawa2, Lulu Zhang2, Ning Tang2,3.
Abstract
To mitigate global warming and achieve carbon neutrality, biomass has become a widely used carbon-neutral energy source due to its low cost and easy availability. However, the incomplete combustion of biomass can produce polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are harmful to human health. Moreover, increasing numbers of wildfires in many regions caused by global warming have greatly increased the emissions of PAHs from biomass burning. To effectively mitigate PAH pollution and health risks associated with biomass usage, the concentrations, compositions and influencing factors of PAH emissions from biomass burning are summarized in this review. High PAH emissions from open burning and stove burning are found, and two- to four-ring PAHs account for a higher proportion than five- and six-ring PAHs. Based on the mechanism of biomass burning, biomass with higher volatile matter, cellulose, lignin, potassium salts and moisture produces more PAHs. Moreover, burning biomass in stoves at a high temperature or with an insufficient oxygen supply can increase PAH emissions. Therefore, the formation and emission of PAHs can be reduced by pelletizing, briquetting or carbonizing biomass to increase its density and burning efficiency. This review contributes to a comprehensive understanding of PAH pollution from biomass burning, providing prospective insight for preventing air pollution and health hazards associated with carbon neutrality.Entities:
Keywords: biomass composition; burning conditions; emission characteristic; formation mechanism; stove design
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35409624 PMCID: PMC8998094 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19073944
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Top three industries in PAHs emissions in different countries and around the world.
| Region | First PAH Emissions 1 | Second PAH Emissions 1 | Third PAH Emissions 1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Amount (Gg) | Industry | Amount (Gg) | Industry | Amount (Gg) | |
| World | IBB 2 | 293 | Motor Vehicle | 64.5 | Wildfire | 56.4 |
| China | IBB | 57.7 | Coke burning | 13.8 | Motor Vehicle | 13.4 |
| India | IBB | 55.8 | Motor Vehicle | 5.03 | BOB 3 | 2.35 |
| Brazil | Wildfire | 17.4 | IBB | 5.13 | Motor Vehicle | 4.35 |
| Indonesia | IBB | 15.4 | Motor Vehicle | 2.89 | Wildfire | 0.43 |
| Russia | Motor Vehicle | 2.83 | Wildfire | 1.87 | Industry | 1.11 |
| Angola | Wildfire | 3.49 | IBB | 0.86 | Motor Vehicle | 0.14 |
| The United States | IBB | 4.96 | Motor Vehicle | 1.50 | Wildfire | 1.02 |
Shen et al. [35]; 2 IBB: Indoor biomass burning; 3 BOB: Biomass open burning.
Comparison of the EFs of PAHs emission from traditional fuels and biomass fuels.
| Traditional Fuel | Biomass Fuel | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Type | EFs | Fuel Type | EFs | |
| Anthracite | 2.1 | Mixed wood | 60.6 | [ |
| Mixed coal | 119.1 | Mixed wood | 38.9 | [ |
| Mixed coal | 15.5 | Crop residue pellets | 43.9 | [ |
| Anthracite and bituminous | 123.1 | Crop residue and wood | 191.1 | [ |
Comparison of the concentration of PAHs in non-burning period with open burning period.
| PAHs Number | Cities | Non-Burning Period | Open Burning Period | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Taichung, China | 11.0 ± 1.51 | 30.8 ± 3.93 | [ |
| 9 | Hanoi, Vietnam | 14.4 ± 3.69 | 4488 ± 3850 | [ |
| 9 | Hanoi, Vietnam | 2.60 ± 1.31 | 3064 ± 2370 | [ |
| 16 | Bangkok, Thailand | 32.4 ± 17.1 | 108 ± 25.7 | [ |
| 14 | Klong Luang, Thailand | 43.4 ± 20.0 | 414 ± 24.0 | [ |
Comparison of the concentration of PAHs in non-cooking with cooking.
| PAHs Number | Cities | Non-Cooking | Cooking | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Lucknow, India | 1120 ±190 | 9110 ± 3570 | [ |
| 7 | Lucknow, India | 3530 ± 890 | 15600 ± 2950 | [ |
| 15 | Laiyang, China | 513 ± 225 | 696 ± 230 | [ |
| 16 | Nanyang, China | 210 ± 23.4 | 443 ± 59.7 | [ |
| 15 | Zhuanghu, China | 1530 ± 244 | 2660 ± 1120 | [ |
Comparison of PAHs concentration in the non-heating period with heating period.
| PAHs | Cities | Non-Heating Period (ng/m3) | Heating Period (ng/m3) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Zagreb, Croatian | 0.54 | 41.2 | [ |
| 15 | Warsaw, Poland (Outdoor) | 36.0 | 106 | [ |
| 15 | Warsaw, Poland (Indoor) | 131 | 461 | [ |
| 10 | Delnice, Croatia (Rural) | 0.80 | 48.5 | [ |
| 10 | Delnice, Croatia (Urban) | 0.40 | 21.7 | [ |
| 9 | Rome, Italy | 1.28 | 10.6 | [ |
| 9 | Augsburg, Germany | 0.44 | 13.0 | [ |
Composition of the PAHs in different studies in normal period and biomass burning period.
| City | 4-Ring PAHs | 5-Ring PAHs | 6-Ring PAHs | Total PAHs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tainan, China | 6.64 | 0.56 | 1.12 | 2.83 | [ |
| Hanoi, Vietnam | 401 | 219 | 86.0 | 311 | [ |
| Baoding, China | 3.89 | 3.58 | 3.27 | 3.59 | [ |
The ignition, peak and burnout temperature of biomass.
| Biomass | Ignition (°C) | Peak (°C) | Burnout (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oat straw | 260 | 300 | 512 | [ |
| Wheat straw | 227 | 281 | 436 | [ |
| Wheat husk | 242 | 299 | 490 | [ |
| cotton stalks | 261 | 294 | 480 | [ |
Emission factors and composition of PAHs from the burning of different biomass in the same conditions.
| 3-Ring | 4-Ring | 5-Ring | 6-Ring | Total PAHs (mg/kg) | Stove | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice Straw | 49% | 38% | 8% | 4% | 42.5 | Brick cooking stove | [ |
| Wheat Straw | 63% | 28% | 6% | 3% | 65.2 | ||
| Corn Straw | 60% | 30% | 7% | 3% | 19.0 | ||
| Dung Cakes | 30% | 44% | 16% | 11% | 53.8 | Open burning | [ |
| Charcoal | 21% | 47% | 19% | 13% | 27.3 | ||
| Crop residue | 66% | 26% | 6% | 3% | 30.0 | Brick cooking stove | [ |
| Fuel wood | 59% | 33% | 5% | 2% | 6.76 | ||
| Brushwood | 38% | 42% | 12% | 7% | 47.1 | ||
| Ceanothus | 37% | 34% | 23% | 6% | 6.47 | Laboratory burning stove | [ |
| California sage | 5% | 47% | 39% | 8% | 11.7 | ||
| Coastal sage | 6% | 49% | 30% | 15% | 11.3 |
The emission of PAHs under the burning of same biomass contains different volatile matter in the same stove during the laboratory-simulated stove burning.
| Biomass | Volatile Matter (wt%) | PAHs (μg/g) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maize straw (Raw) | 76.00 | 7.70 | [ |
| Maize straw (Carbonization) | 25.01 | 1.10 | |
| wheat straw (Raw) | 67.36 | 18.8 | |
| wheat straw (Carbonization) | 16.95 | 1.60 | |
| Wood branch (Raw) | 82.96 | 8.70 | |
| Wood branch (Carbonization) | 44.94 | 2.90 | |
| Wheat straw (Raw) | 73.27 | 213 | [ |
| Wheat straw (Carbonization) | 29.99 | 13.1 | |
| Rice Straw (Raw) | 71.53 | 189 | |
| Rice Straw (Carbonization) | 25.67 | 18.2 | |
| Maize Straw (Raw) | 74.22 | 203 | |
| Maize Straw (Carbonization) | 28.26 | 4.03 | |
| Sawdust (Raw) | 77.47 | 241 | |
| Sawdust (Carbonization) | 38.44 | 4.73 |
The EF and composition of PAHs at different biomass moisture content.
| Moisture (%) | Total PAHs (mg/kg) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 3.19 × 10−3 | [ |
| 25 | 5.57 × 10−3 | |
| 0 | 33.87 | [ |
| 5 | 4.22 | |
| 10 | 2.42 | |
| 15 | 1.75 | |
| 20 | 4.06 | |
| 25 | 3.43 | |
| 30 | 5.42 | |
| 5 | 3.02 | [ |
| 10 | 8.14 | |
| 20 | 17.1 | |
| 15 | 3.20 | [ |
| 25 | 24.3 |
Emission factors of PAHs of the same biomass burning in different stoves.
| Stove Type | PAHs EFs (mg/kg) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Top-feed pellet stove | 0.04 | [ |
| Wood stove | 0.96 | |
| Gasifier wood stove | 31.2 | [ |
| Guizhou brick stove | 132 | |
| Sichuan brick stove | 262 | |
| Metal stove | 5.50 | [ |
| Grihalaxmi stove | 3.80 | |
| Traditional stove | 3.10 |
Relative changes in PAH composition from rice and bean burning at different temperatures.
| PAHs | R300/200 1,2 | R400/200 2 | R500/200 2 | R600/200 2 | R700/200 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice | |||||
| 3-ring | 1.48 | 1.50 | 1.74 | 2.52 | 2.63 |
| 4-ring | 1.68 | 2.43 | 3.72 | 6.26 | 7.35 |
| 5-ring | 1.81 | 1.95 | 2.54 | 3.04 | 3.15 |
| 6-ring | 2.33 | 1.56 | 2.24 | 2.11 | 3.35 |
| Bean | |||||
| 3-ring | 1.06 | 1.28 | 3.54 | 5.17 | 16.1 |
| 4-ring | 0.87 | 1.19 | 2.04 | 4.10 | 9.16 |
| 5-ring | 0.75 | 0.99 | 1.83 | 2.93 | 19.7 |
| 6-ring | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.45 | 2.46 | 24.5 |
1 Represents the result of PAHs EF values of biomass burning in 300 °C divided with PAHs EF values of biomass burning in 200 °C; 2 Lu et al. [131].