Literature DB >> 17626431

Emissions from laboratory combustion of wildland fuels: emission factors and source profiles.

L W Antony Chen1, Hans Moosmüller, W Patrick Arnott, Judith C Chow, John G Watson, Ronald A Susott, Ronald E Babbitt, Cyle E Wold, Emily N Lincoln, Wei Min Hao.   

Abstract

Combustion of wildland fuels represents a major source of particulate matter (PM) and light-absorbing elemental carbon (EC) on a national and global scale, but the emission factors and source profiles have not been well characterized with respect to different fuels and combustion phases. These uncertainties limit the accuracy of current emission inventories, smoke forecasts, and source apportionments. This study investigates the evolution of gaseous and particulate emission and combustion efficiency by burning wildland fuels in a laboratory combustion facility. Emission factors for carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), total hydrocarbon (THC), nitrogen oxides (NO(x)), PM, light extinction and absorption cross sections, and spectral scattering cross sections specific to flaming and smoldering phases are reported. Emission factors are generally reproducible within +/- 20% during the flaming phase, which, despite its short duration, dominates the carbon emission (mostly in the form of CO2) and the production of light absorption and EC. Higher and more variable emission factors for CO, THC, and PM are found during the smoldering phase, especially for fuels containing substantial moisture. Organic carbon (OC) and EC mass account for a majority (i.e., > 60%) of PM mass; other important elements include potassium, chlorine, and sulfur. Thermal analysis separates the EC into subfractions based on analysis temperature demonstrating that high-temperature EC (EC2; at 700 degrees C) varies from 1% to 70% of PM among biomass burns, compared to 75% in kerosene soot. Despite this, the conversion factor between EC and light absorption emissions is rather consistent across fuels and burns, ranging from 7.8 to 9.6 m2/g EC. Findings from this study should be considered in the development of PM and EC emission inventories for visibility and radiative forcing assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626431     DOI: 10.1021/es062364i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  9 in total

1.  Size distribution characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in Xishuangbanna, southwest China: a sign for biomass burning in Asia.

Authors:  Yuhong Guo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Kerosene lighting contributes to household air pollution in rural Uganda.

Authors:  D Muyanja; J G Allen; J Vallarino; L Valeri; B Kakuhikire; D R Bangsberg; D C Christiani; A C Tsai; P S Lai
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 5.770

3.  Characterization of emissions and residues from simulations of the Deepwater Horizon surface oil burns.

Authors:  Brian K Gullett; Johanna Aurell; Amara Holder; William Mitchell; Dale Greenwell; Michael Hays; Robyn Conmy; Dennis Tabor; William Preston; Ingrid George; Joseph P Abrahamson; Randy Vander Wal; Edith Holder
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Characterization of carbonaceous fractions in PM2.5 and PM10 over a typical industrial city in central China.

Authors:  Changlin Zhan; Jiaquan Zhang; Jingru Zheng; Ruizhen Yao; Ping Wang; Hongxia Liu; Wensheng Xiao; Xianli Liu; Junji Cao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Household light makes global heat: high black carbon emissions from kerosene wick lamps.

Authors:  Nicholas L Lam; Yanju Chen; Cheryl Weyant; Chandra Venkataraman; Pankaj Sadavarte; Michael A Johnson; Kirk R Smith; Benjamin T Brem; Joseph Arineitwe; Justin E Ellis; Tami C Bond
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Kerosene: a review of household uses and their hazards in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Nicholas L Lam; Kirk R Smith; Alison Gauthier; Michael N Bates
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.393

7.  Characterization of PM(2.5) collected during broadcast and slash-pile prescribed burns of predominately ponderosa pine forests in northern Arizona.

Authors:  Marin S Robinson; Min Zhao; Lindsay Zack; Christine Brindley; Lillian Portz; Matthew Quarterman; Xiufen Long; Pierre Herckes
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Chemical Composition and Emissions Factors for Cookstove Startup (Ignition) Materials.

Authors:  Kristen M Fedak; Nicholas Good; Jordyn Dahlke; Arsineh Hecobian; Amy Sullivan; Yong Zhou; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Emitted from Open Burning and Stove Burning of Biomass: A Brief Review.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Xuan Zhang; Yan Wang; Pengchu Bai; Kazuichi Hayakawa; Lulu Zhang; Ning Tang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.