Literature DB >> 22924525

Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards.

James Jetter1, Yongxin Zhao, Kirk R Smith, Bernine Khan, Tiffany Yelverton, Peter Decarlo, Michael D Hays.   

Abstract

Realistic metrics and methods for testing household biomass cookstoves are required to develop standards needed by international policy makers, donors, and investors. Application of consistent test practices allows emissions and energy efficiency performance to be benchmarked and enables meaningful comparisons among traditional and advanced stove types. In this study, 22 cookstoves burning six fuel types (wood, charcoal, pellets, corn cobs, rice hulls, and plant oil) at two fuel moisture levels were examined under laboratory-controlled operating conditions as outlined in the Water Boiling Test (WBT) protocol, Version 4. Pollutant emissions (carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane, total hydrocarbons, and ultrafine particles) were continuously monitored. Fine particle mass was measured gravimetrically for each WBT phase. Additional measurements included cookstove power, energy efficiency, and fuel use. Emission factors are given on the basis of fuel energy, cooking energy, fuel mass, time, and cooking task or activity. The lowest PM(2.5) emissions were 74 mg MJ(delivered)(-1) from a technologically advanced cookstove compared with 700-1400 mg MJ(delivered)(-1) from the base-case open 3-stone cookfire. The highest thermal efficiency was 53% compared with 14-15% for the 3-stone cookfire. Based on these laboratory-controlled test results and observations, recommendations for developing potentially useful metrics for setting international standards are suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22924525     DOI: 10.1021/es301693f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  58 in total

1.  Mutagenicity- and pollutant-emission factors of pellet-fueled gasifier cookstoves: Comparison with other combustion sources.

Authors:  Wyatt M Champion; Sarah H Warren; Ingeborg M Kooter; William Preston; Q Todd Krantz; David M DeMarini; James J Jetter
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Fuel Efficiency and Air Pollutant Concentrations of Wood-Burning Improved Cookstoves in Malawi: Implications for Scaling-up Cookstove Programs.

Authors:  Pamela Jagger; Joseph Pedit; Ashley Bittner; Laura Hamrick; Tione Phwandapwhanda; Charles Jumbe
Journal:  Energy Sustain Dev       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  To promote adoption of household health technologies, think beyond health.

Authors:  Mark C Thurber; Christina Warner; Lauren Platt; Alexander Slaski; Rajesh Gupta; Grant Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Kitchen concentrations of fine particulate matter and particle number concentration in households using biomass cookstoves in rural Honduras.

Authors:  Megan L Benka-Coker; Jennifer L Peel; John Volckens; Nicholas Good; Kelsey R Bilsback; Christian L'Orange; Casey Quinn; Bonnie N Young; Sarah Rajkumar; Ander Wilson; Jessica Tryner; Sebastian Africano; Anibal B Osorto; Maggie L Clark
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Characterizing Particulate Matter Exfiltration Estimates for Alternative Cookstoves in a Village-Like Household in Rural Nepal.

Authors:  Sutyajeet I Soneja; James M Tielsch; Subarna K Khatry; Benjamin Zaitchik; Frank C Curriero; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  A Laboratory Comparison of Emission Factors, Number Size Distributions, and Morphology of Ultrafine Particles from 11 Different Household Cookstove-Fuel Systems.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Chethan K Gaddam; Seth M Ebersviller; Randy L Vander Wal; Craig Williams; Jerroll W Faircloth; James J Jetter; Michael D Hays
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Transient climate and ambient health impacts due to national solid fuel cookstove emissions.

Authors:  Forrest G Lacey; Daven K Henze; Colin J Lee; Aaron van Donkelaar; Randall V Martin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Field-based emission measurements of biomass burning in typical Chinese built-in-place stoves.

Authors:  Wei Du; Xi Zhu; Yuanchen Chen; Weijian Liu; Wei Wang; Guofeng Shen; Shu Tao; James J Jetter
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  'Oorja' in India: Assessing a large-scale commercial distribution of advanced biomass stoves to households.

Authors:  Mark C Thurber; Himani Phadke; Sriniketh Nagavarapu; Gireesh Shrimali; Hisham Zerriffi
Journal:  Energy Sustain Dev       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Influence of fuel moisture, charge size, feeding rate and air ventilation conditions on the emissions of PM, OC, EC, parent PAHs, and their derivatives from residential wood combustion.

Authors:  Guofeng Shen; Miao Xue; Siye Wei; Yuanchen Chen; Qiuyue Zhao; Bing Li; Haisuo Wu; Shu Tao
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 5.565

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.