Literature DB >> 3540654

Chemical carcinogens. A review and analysis of the literature of selected chemicals and the establishment of the Gene-Tox Carcinogen Data Base. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.

S Nesnow, M Argus, H Bergman, K Chu, C Frith, T Helmes, R McGaughy, V Ray, T J Slaga, R Tennant.   

Abstract

The literature on 506 selected chemicals has been evaluated for evidence that these chemicals induce tumors in experimental animals and this assessment comprises the Gene-Tox Carcinogen Data Base. Three major sources of information were used to create this evaluated data base: all 185 chemicals determined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer to have Sufficient evidence of carcinogenic activity in experimental animals, 28 selected chemicals bioassayed for carcinogenic activity by the National Toxicology Program/National Cancer Institute and found to induce tumors in mice and rats, and 293 selected chemicals which had been evaluated in genetic toxicology and related bioassays as determined from previous Gene-Tox reports. The literature data on the 239 chemicals were analyzed by the Gene-Tox Carcinogenesis Panel in an organized, rational and consistent manner. Criteria were established to assess individual studies employing single chemicals and 4 categories of response were developed: Positive, Negative, Inconclusive (Equivocal) and Inconclusive. After evaluating each of the individual studies on the 293 chemicals, the Panel placed each of the 506 chemicals in an overall classification category based on the strength of the evidence indicating the presence or absence of carcinogenic effects. An 8-category decision scheme was established using a modified version of the International Agency for Research on Cancer approach. This scheme included two categories of Positive (Sufficient and Limited), two categories of Negative (Sufficient and Limited), a category of Equivocal (the evidence of carcinogenicity from well-conducted and well-reported lifetime studies had uncertain significance and was neither clearly positive nor negative), and three categories of Inadequate (the evidence of carcinogenicity was insufficient to make a decision, however, the data suggested a positive or negative indication). Of the 506 chemicals in the Gene-Tox Carcinogen Data Base, 252 were evaluated as Sufficient Positive, 99 as Limited Positive, 40 as Sufficient Negative, 21 as Limited Negative, 1 as Equivocal, 13 as Inadequate with the data suggesting a positive indication, 32 as Inadequate with the data suggesting a negative indication, and 48 Inadequate with the data not suggesting any indication of activity. This data base was analyzed and examined according to chemical class, using a 29 chemical class scheme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3540654     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(87)90017-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Quantification of chemical genetic risk].

Authors:  U H Ehling
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1989-05

Review 2.  Utility of short-term tests for genetic toxicity.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; J Lewtas; H E Brockman
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.691

3.  Indoor air levels of chlordane and heptachlor following termiticide applications.

Authors:  J B Louis; K C Kisselbach
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.151

4.  Comparison of the cytotoxicity and DNA-damaging properties of 2,4-D and U 46 D fluid (dimethylammonium salt of 2,4-D).

Authors:  M Clausen; G Leier; I Witte
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Quantitative evaluation of the effects of human carcinogens and related chemicals on human foreskin fibroblasts.

Authors:  P Kurian; S Nesnow; G E Milo
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.691

6.  AM1 Study of N-2-Acetylaminofluorene bonded to Deoxyguanosine at the Minor Adduct Site.

Authors:  M Besson; E P Batchelor
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.365

7.  Current status of the Gene-Tox Program.

Authors:  A E Auletta; M Brown; J S Wassom; M C Cimino
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Binding of Sudan II and IV to lecithin liposomes and E. coli membranes: insights into the toxicity of hydrophobic azo dyes.

Authors:  Lu Li; Hong-Wen Gao; Jiao-Rong Ren; Ling Chen; Yu-Cheng Li; Jian-Fu Zhao; He-Ping Zhao; Yuan Yuan
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2007-03-27

9.  Analysis and comparison of information and data recorded in carcinogenicity and genotoxicity databases.

Authors:  P Romano; O Aresu; B Parodi; D Malacarne; G Castagneto; S Parodi; T Ruzzon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.

Authors:  K Yoshikawa
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.