Literature DB >> 8834860

Anomalous nonidentity between Salmonella genotoxicants and rodent carcinogens: nongenotoxic carcinogens and genotoxic noncarcinogens.

K Yoshikawa1.   

Abstract

According to current data, the capacity to cause nonprogrammed or unscheduled cell proliferation in target tissues, a common characteristic of chemical carcinogens, may play a more important role in the development of tumors than does genotoxicity. This paper provides strong support for the validity of this conclusion. Ames-negative nongenotoxicants may be considered to be carcinogenic primarily because of their ability to induce cell proliferation in animal tissues and organs. In addition, such nongenotoxic carcinogens may also provide latent and modest DNA (equivocal) modifications that never lead to Ames-positive events. Conversely, noncarcinogenesis by Ames-positive agents is likely to be linked to a lack of stimulation of cell division. Nongenotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens rely on both cell proliferation and equivocal DNA modification for their full carcinogenicity. Such equivocal DNA modifications do not appear to be formed by tumor promoters. The role of cell proliferation may provide a favorable milieu for the occurrence of genetic instability, give rise to selective "apoptosis-resistant abnormal cells," and then affect clonal expansion of these cells. Therefore, understanding the influence of nongenotoxic and genotoxic carcinogens on cell proliferation capability is a key point in determining the mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis. Considering the contradictory and common features of genotoxicants and carcinogens, early detection of nonprogrammed cell proliferation is the most effective approach to predict human and rodent carcinogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8834860      PMCID: PMC1469235          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9610440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  71 in total

Review 1.  The p53 tumour suppressor gene and product.

Authors:  A J Levine
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S M Cohen; L B Ellwein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Correlation of hepatocellular proliferation with hepatocarcinogenicity induced by the mutagenic noncarcinogen:carcinogen pair--2,6- and 2,4-diaminotoluene.

Authors:  M L Cunningham; J Foley; R R Maronpot; H B Matthews
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Relationship between hepatotoxicity and induction of replicative DNA synthesis following single or multiple doses of carbon tetrachloride.

Authors:  D J Doolittle; G Muller; H E Scribner
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1987

5.  Dynamics of the thymidine triphosphate pool during the cell cycle of synchronized 3T3 mouse fibroblasts.

Authors:  G Spyrou; P Reichard
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Hypomethylation of DNA: a possible nongenotoxic mechanism underlying the role of cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J I Goodman; J L Counts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Use of a multistrain assay could improve the NTP carcinogenesis bioassay.

Authors:  M F Festing
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Dioxin-receptor ligands in urban air and vehicle exhaust.

Authors:  G G Mason
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Role of programmed cell death in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J T Isaacs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Perspectives on the risk assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens and tumor promoters.

Authors:  F P Perera
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.