Literature DB >> 35405591

Auditory filter shapes derived from forward and simultaneous masking at low frequencies: Implications for human cochlear tuning.

John Leschke1, Gerardo Rodriguez Orellana2, Christopher A Shera3, Andrew J Oxenham4.   

Abstract

Behavioral forward-masking thresholds with a spectrally notched-noise masker and a fixed low-level probe tone have been shown to provide accurate estimates of cochlear tuning. Estimates using simultaneous masking are similar but generally broader, presumably due to nonlinear cochlear suppression effects. So far, estimates with forward masking have been limited to frequencies of 1 kHz and above. This study used spectrally notched noise under forward and simultaneous masking to estimate frequency selectivity between 200 and 1000 Hz for young adult listeners with normal hearing. Estimates of filter tuning at 1000 Hz were in agreement with previous studies. Estimated tuning broadened below 1000 Hz, with the filter quality factor based on the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (QERB) decreasing more rapidly with decreasing frequency than predicted by previous equations, in line with earlier predictions based on otoacoustic-emission latencies. Estimates from simultaneous masking remained broader than those from forward masking by approximately the same ratio. The new data provide a way to compare human cochlear tuning estimates with auditory-nerve tuning curves from other species across most of the auditory frequency range.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory masking; Cochlear apex; Frequency selectivity; Nonsimultaneous masking

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35405591      PMCID: PMC9167757          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.672


  50 in total

1.  Frequency selectivity for frequencies below 100 Hz: comparisons with mid-frequencies.

Authors:  Carlos Jurado; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: dependence on suppressor frequency and level.

Authors:  B Delgutte
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Physiological mechanisms of psychophysical masking: observations from auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  B Delgutte
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Frequency tuning of basilar membrane and auditory nerve fibers in the same cochleae.

Authors:  S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-12-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Processing of natural sounds in human auditory cortex: tonotopy, spectral tuning, and relation to voice sensitivity.

Authors:  Michelle Moerel; Federico De Martino; Elia Formisano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Shapes of tuning curves for single auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  N Y Kiang; M B Sachs; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Low-level pure-tone masking: a comparison of "tuning curves" obtained with simultaneous and forward masking.

Authors:  L L Vogten
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Threshold tuning curves of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers. I. Dependence on characteristic frequency and relation to the magnitudes of cochlear vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Nola C Rich; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.