Literature DB >> 21218891

Frequency selectivity for frequencies below 100 Hz: comparisons with mid-frequencies.

Carlos Jurado1, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

Auditory filter shapes were derived for signal frequencies (f(s)) between 50 and 1000 Hz, using the notched-noise method. The masker spectrum level (N(0)) was 50 dB (re 20 μPa). For f(s) = 63 and 50 Hz, measurements were also made with N(0) = 62 dB for the lower band. The data were fitted using a rounded-exponential filter model, with special consideration of the filtering effects of the middle-ear transfer function (METF) at low frequencies. The results showed: (1) For very low values of f(s), the lower skirts of the filters were only well defined when N(0) = 62 dB for the lower band; (2) the sharpness of both sides of the filters decreased with decreasing f(s); (3) the dynamic range of the filters decreased with decreasing f(s); (4) the equivalent rectangular bandwidth of the filters decreased with decreasing f(s) down to f(s) = 80 Hz, but increased for f(s) below that; (5) the assumed METF, which includes the shunt effect of the helicotrema for frequencies below 50 Hz, increasingly influenced the low-frequency skirt of the filters as f(s) decreased; and (6) detection efficiency worsened with decreasing f(s) for f(s) between 100 and 500 Hz, but improved slightly below that.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21218891     DOI: 10.1121/1.3504657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Rajeswari Sivakumar; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

3.  Auditory filter shapes derived from forward and simultaneous masking at low frequencies: Implications for human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  John Leschke; Gerardo Rodriguez Orellana; Christopher A Shera; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.672

Review 4.  Development and current status of the "Cambridge" loudness models.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  A Loudness Model for Time-Varying Sounds Incorporating Binaural Inhibition.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore; Brian R Glasberg; Ajanth Varathanathan; Josef Schlittenlacher
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Instrumental Quality Predictions and Analysis of Auditory Cues for Algorithms in Modern Headphone Technology.

Authors:  Thomas Biberger; Henning Schepker; Florian Denk; Stephan D Ewert
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Acoustic coordinated reset therapy for tinnitus with perceptually relevant frequency spacing and levels.

Authors:  Peter A Tass; Alexander N Silchenko; Gerald R Popelka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.