Literature DB >> 35404335

Restoration of Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Sensation Using Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces in Humans with Upper Limb Amputations.

Philip P Vu1, Charles W Lu1, Alex K Vaskov1, Deanna H Gates1, R Brent Gillespie1, Stephen W P Kemp1, Parag G Patil1, Cynthia A Chestek1, Paul S Cederna1, Theodore A Kung1.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Without meaningful and intuitive sensory feedback, even the most advanced prosthetic limbs remain insensate and impose an enormous cognitive burden during use. The regenerative peripheral nerve interface can serve as a novel bidirectional motor and sensory neuroprosthetic interface. In previous human studies, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces demonstrated stable high-amplitude motor electromyography signals with excellent signal-to-noise ratio for prosthetic control. In addition, they can treat and prevent postamputation pain by mitigating neuroma formation. In this study, the authors investigated whether electrical stimulation applied to regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces could produce appreciable proprioceptive and/or tactile sensations in two participants with upper limb amputations. Stimulation of the interfaces resulted in both participants reporting proprioceptive sensations in the phantom hand. Specifically, stimulation of participant 1's median nerve regenerative peripheral nerve interface activated a flexion sensation in the thumb or index finger, whereas stimulation of the ulnar nerve interface evoked a flexion sensation of the ring or small finger. Likewise, stimulation of one of participant 2's ulnar nerve interfaces produced a sensation of flexion at the ring finger distal interphalangeal joint. In addition, stimulation of participant 2's other ulnar nerve interface and the median nerve interface resulted in perceived cutaneous sensations that corresponded to each nerve's respective dermatome. These results suggest that regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces have the potential to restore proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory feedback that could significantly improve prosthesis use and embodiment.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35404335      PMCID: PMC9133017          DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   5.169


  10 in total

1.  Double nerve intraneural interface implant on a human amputee for robotic hand control.

Authors:  Paolo M Rossini; Silvestro Micera; Antonella Benvenuto; Jacopo Carpaneto; Giuseppe Cavallo; Luca Citi; Christian Cipriani; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro; Giovanni Di Pino; Florinda Ferreri; Eugenio Guglielmelli; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Stanisa Raspopovic; Jacopo Rigosa; Luca Rossini; Mario Tombini; Paolo Dario
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment.

Authors:  Elaine Biddiss; Tom Chau
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 3.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review.

Authors:  Joseph T Belter; Jacob L Segil; Aaron M Dollar; Richard F Weir
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

4.  Robotic touch shifts perception of embodiment to a prosthesis in targeted reinnervation amputees.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Keehoon Kim; James Edward Colgate; Michael A Peshkin; Todd A Kuiken
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface for Management of Postamputation Neuroma.

Authors:  Carrie A Kubiak; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces to Prevent Postamputation Pain.

Authors:  Carrie A Kubiak; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna; Theodore A Kung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand.

Authors:  J A George; D T Kluger; T S Davis; S M Wendelken; E V Okorokova; Q He; C C Duncan; D T Hutchinson; Z C Thumser; D T Beckler; P D Marasco; S J Bensmaia; G A Clark
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-07-24

8.  Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Augurelle; Allan M Smith; Thierry Lejeune; Jean-Louis Thonnard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Prevention and Management of Neuromas.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Jeremie D Oliver; Paul S Cederna; Theodore A Kung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for the Treatment of Postamputation Neuroma Pain: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Shoshana L Woo; Theodore A Kung; David L Brown; James A Leonard; Brian M Kelly; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-12-27
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces Effectively Prevent Neuroma Formation After Sciatic Nerve Transection in Rats.

Authors:  Jiaqing Wu; Yajun Zhang; Xiaoyuan Zhang; Zhiyu Lin; Guangxue Li
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.261

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.