OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources in upper-limb prosthesis use and abandonment. DESIGN: A self-administered, anonymous survey was designed to explore these factors. The questionnaire was available online and in paper format and was distributed through healthcare providers, community support groups, and one prosthesis manufacturer. Two hundred forty-two participants of all ages and levels of upper-limb absence completed the survey. RESULTS: Of participants, 20% had abandoned prosthesis use. Predisposing factors, namely, origin of limb absence, gender, bilateral limb absence, and, most importantly, level of limb absence, proved influential in the decision not to wear prostheses. Enabling resources such as the availability of health care, cost, and quality of training did not weigh heavily on prosthesis rejection, with the exception of the fitting time frame and the involvement of clients in the prosthesis selection. Conversely, the state of available technology was a highly censured factor in abandonment, specifically in the areas of comfort and function. Perceived need emerged as a predominant factor in prosthesis use. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on continued development of more comfortable and functional prostheses, particularly for individuals with high-level or bilateral limb absence. Improved follow-up, repair, and information services, together with active involvement of clients in the selection of prostheses meeting their specific goals and needs, is recommended.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources in upper-limb prosthesis use and abandonment. DESIGN: A self-administered, anonymous survey was designed to explore these factors. The questionnaire was available online and in paper format and was distributed through healthcare providers, community support groups, and one prosthesis manufacturer. Two hundred forty-two participants of all ages and levels of upper-limb absence completed the survey. RESULTS: Of participants, 20% had abandoned prosthesis use. Predisposing factors, namely, origin of limb absence, gender, bilateral limb absence, and, most importantly, level of limb absence, proved influential in the decision not to wear prostheses. Enabling resources such as the availability of health care, cost, and quality of training did not weigh heavily on prosthesis rejection, with the exception of the fitting time frame and the involvement of clients in the prosthesis selection. Conversely, the state of available technology was a highly censured factor in abandonment, specifically in the areas of comfort and function. Perceived need emerged as a predominant factor in prosthesis use. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on continued development of more comfortable and functional prostheses, particularly for individuals with high-level or bilateral limb absence. Improved follow-up, repair, and information services, together with active involvement of clients in the selection of prostheses meeting their specific goals and needs, is recommended.
Authors: Noah M Ledbetter; Christian Ethier; Emily R Oby; Scott D Hiatt; Andrew M Wilder; Jason H Ko; Sonya P Agnew; Lee E Miller; Gregory A Clark Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Katherine R Schoepp; Michael R Dawson; Jonathon S Schofield; Jason P Carey; Jacqueline S Hebert Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2018-08-13 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: William F Cusack; Rebecca Patterson; Scott Thach; Robert S Kistenberg; Lewis A Wheaton Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 1.972