Literature DB >> 21183491

Functional imaging of the pelvic floor.

Dean D T Maglinte1, Clive I Bartram, Douglass A Hale, Jean Park, Marc D Kohli, Bruce W Robb, Stefania Romano, John C Lappas.   

Abstract

The clinical treatment of patients with anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction is often difficult. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography (DCP) has evolved from a method of evaluating the anorectum for functional disorders to its current status as a functional method of evaluating the global pelvic floor for defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse. It has both high observer accuracy and a high yield of positive diagnoses. Clinicians find it a useful diagnostic tool that can alter management decisions from surgical to medical and vice versa in many cases. Functional radiography provides the maximum stress to the pelvic floor, resulting in levator ani relaxation accompanied by rectal emptying-which is needed to diagnose defecatory disorders. It also provides organ-specific quantificative information about female pelvic organ prolapse-information that usually can only be inferred by means of physical examination. The application of functional radiography to the assessment of defecatory disorders and pelvic organ prolapse has highlighted the limitations of physical examination. It has become clear that pelvic floor disorders rarely occur in isolation and that global pelvic floor assessment is necessary. Despite the advances in other imaging methods, DCP has remained a practical, cost-effective procedure for the evaluation of anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction. In this article, the authors describe the technique they use when performing DCP, define the radiographic criteria used for diagnosis, and discuss the limitations and clinical utility of DCP. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21183491     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  Accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared to defaecatory MRI in females with pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction.

Authors:  Alison J Hainsworth; Sophie A Pilkington; Catherine Grierson; Elizabeth Rutherford; Alexis M P Schizas; Karen P Nugent; Andrew B Williams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  [Anorectal diagnostics for proctological diseases].

Authors:  T Jackisch; H Witzigmann; S Stelzner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Comparison of dynamic transperineal ultrasound and defecography for the evaluation of pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Marc Beer-Gabel; Dan Carter
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Dynamic MRI defecography vs. entero-colpo-cysto-defecography in the evaluation of midline pelvic floor hernias in female pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Salvatore Cappabianca; Alfonso Reginelli; Francesca Iacobellis; Vincenza Granata; Luigi Urciuoli; Maria Eleonora Alabiso; Graziella Di Grezia; Ines Marano; Gianluca Gatta; Roberto Grassi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel.

Authors:  Milana Flusberg; Yin Xi; Kedar Jambhekar; Simin Bahrami; Victoria Chernyak; Neeraj Lalwani; Mark Lockhart; Roopa Ram; Julia R Fielding; Rania Farouk El Sayed; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-13

7.  Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Authors:  Victoria Chernyak; Joshua Bleier; Mariya Kobi; Ian Paquette; Milana Flusberg; Philippe Zimmern; Larissa V Rodriguez; Phyllis Glanc; Suzanne Palmer; Luz Maria Rodriguez; Marsha K Guess; Milena M Weinstein; Roopa Ram; Kedar Jambhekar; Gaurav Khatri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-27

8.  The added value of conventional defecography and MRI defecography in clinical decision making on treatment for posterior compartment prolapse.

Authors:  Dionne M Nijland; Linde T van Genugten; Karin S Dekker; Gert Jan Wagenmakers; Sicco J Braak; Angelique L Veenstra van Nieuwenhoven; Annemarie van der Steen; Anique T M Grob
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios K Manatakis; Nikolaos Gouvas; George Pechlivanides; Evangelos Xynos
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-10-19

Review 10.  Before and after Anorectal Surgery: Which Information Is Needed from the Functional Laboratory?

Authors:  Maria Witte; Frank Schwandner; Ernst Klar
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2018-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.