Ciqing Tong1, Joeri A J Wondergem2, Marijn van den Brink1, Markus C Kwakernaak1, Ying Chen1, Marco M R M Hendrix3, Ilja K Voets3, Erik H J Danen4, Sylvia Le Dévédec4, Doris Heinrich2,5,6, Roxanne E Kieltyka1. 1. Department of Supramolecular and Biomaterials Chemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Biological and Soft Matter Physics, Huygens-Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9504, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. 3. Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MD Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 4. Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9502, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands. 5. Institute for Bioprocessing and Analytical Measurement Techniques, Rosenhof 1, 37308 Heilbad Heiligenstadt, Germany. 6. Faculty for Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Abstract
Supramolecular materials provide unique opportunities to mimic both the structure and mechanics of the biopolymer networks that compose the extracellular matrix. However, strategies to modify their filamentous structures in space and time in 3D cell culture to study cell behavior as encountered in development and disease are lacking. We herein disclose a multicomponent squaramide-based supramolecular material whose mechanics and bioactivity can be controlled by light through co-assembly of a 1,2-dithiolane (DT) monomer that forms disulfide cross-links. Remarkably, increases in storage modulus from ∼200 Pa to >10 kPa after stepwise photo-cross-linking can be realized without an initiator while retaining colorlessness and clarity. Moreover, viscoelasticity and plasticity of the supramolecular networks decrease upon photo-irradiation, reducing cellular protrusion formation and motility when performed at the onset of cell culture. When applied during 3D cell culture, force-mediated manipulation is impeded and cells move primarily along earlier formed channels in the materials. Additionally, we show photopatterning of peptide cues in 3D using either a photomask or direct laser writing. We demonstrate that these squaramide-based filamentous materials can be applied to the development of synthetic and biomimetic 3D in vitro cell and disease models, where their secondary cross-linking enables mechanical heterogeneity and shaping at multiple length scales.
Supramolecular materials provide unique opportunities to mimic both the structure and mechanics of the biopolymer networks that compose the extracellular matrix. However, strategies to modify their filamentous structures in space and time in 3D cell culture to study cell behavior as encountered in development and disease are lacking. We herein disclose a multicomponent squaramide-based supramolecular material whose mechanics and bioactivity can be controlled by light through co-assembly of a 1,2-dithiolane (DT) monomer that forms disulfide cross-links. Remarkably, increases in storage modulus from ∼200 Pa to >10 kPa after stepwise photo-cross-linking can be realized without an initiator while retaining colorlessness and clarity. Moreover, viscoelasticity and plasticity of the supramolecular networks decrease upon photo-irradiation, reducing cellular protrusion formation and motility when performed at the onset of cell culture. When applied during 3D cell culture, force-mediated manipulation is impeded and cells move primarily along earlier formed channels in the materials. Additionally, we show photopatterning of peptide cues in 3D using either a photomask or direct laser writing. We demonstrate that these squaramide-based filamentous materials can be applied to the development of synthetic and biomimetic 3D in vitro cell and disease models, where their secondary cross-linking enables mechanical heterogeneity and shaping at multiple length scales.
Entities:
Keywords:
3D cell culture; dithiolane; hydrogels; photopatterning; supramolecular
Synthetic biomaterials
that accurately mimic the cell micro-environment
including its spatiotemporally evolving mechanical character are essential
tools in the healthcare area to better understand disease and guide
its treatment.[1−4] While biological materials based on natural extracellular matrices
(ECMs) or proteins have provided a wealth of information on cell behavior
in their use as in vitro culture substrates, they
lack the possibilities to fully decouple various matrix parameters
(e.g., mechanics and bioactivity) and modulation of their properties in situ during culture.[5,6] Alternatively,
synthetic polymer hydrogels that mimic the water-rich character of
native tissues offer boundless means to interrogate and guide cells
undergoing complex biological processes through the ability to control
their architectural and chemical features.[7] In contrast to earlier strategies that relied on the use of covalent
bonds to engineer gel mechanical properties such as stiffness,[8−11] the field is shifting toward chemistries that are dynamic to obtain
materials that can simulate the complex mechanical characteristics
(e.g., viscoelasticity and nonlinear elasticity) of ECM proteins and
tissues.[12−17]Inspiration for the design of synthetic biomaterials can be
derived
from the fibrous proteins of the ECM, such as collagens, elastins,
and fibronectins, that engage in a mechanical dialogue with cells.[18−22] Collagen, a major component of human protein mass, forms filamentous
protein networks with nonlinear elastic, viscoelastic, and viscoplastic
mechanical features.[23−25] Further cross-linking of these filaments defines
the structure, stability, and mechanics of the ECM in various tissues
and tissue states.[24] For example, lysyl
oxidases[26,27] covalently cross-link collagen filaments
in processes such as tissue maturation, but their aberrant overexpression
is associated with diseases of the cardiovascular system and cancer;
mammary tumor tissue can reach up to 10 kPa in stiffness and is mechanically
heterogeneous, affecting integrin activation and tumor initiation.[28−30] In addition to enzymes, cells can also modify the architecture of
the ECM locally by exerting physical force on it resulting in its
plastic deformation, further influencing cell migration and invasion.[30,59] While recent works have gleaned insights into such remodeling processes
in natural materials,[20,22,31] fully synthetic approaches involving filamentous polymer materials
that can provide these complex mechanical characteristics,[14,17] their simultaneous decoupling from bioactive cues, and the potential
to evolve them spatiotemporally in 3D culture as encountered in disease
progression are rare. Access to such materials can provide unparalleled
opportunities to better understand cell behavior in the context of
a dynamic and heterogeneous mechanical environment that is inherent
to the ECM in numerous developmental and disease processes.Supramolecular polymers constructed from monomers that associate
through non-covalent interactions, such as hydrogen-bonding, π-stacking,
and hydrophobicity, provide access to filamentous structures that
bear analogy to the biopolymers that compose the ECM.[32,33] For some monomers above a critical concentration in water, hydrogel
materials can be formed that are mechanically weak with self-recovering
character having advantages for numerous applications in the biomedical
area.[34,35] To overcome their low stiffness, cross-linking
of the supramolecular polymer filaments has been examined by introducing
reactive groups on the monomers that can either ligate with themselves
or through small molecules and polymers.[36−39] Among these strategies, light-mediated
ones are attractive as they provide opportunities for spatiotemporal
control of the material properties.[35] For
example, internal polymerization of supramolecular polymer filaments
during UV irradiation has been demonstrated to modulate gel stiffness,
and further interfilament cross-linking can yield strain stiffening
behavior.[40−44] However, these approaches involve the use of reagents incompatible
with cells, or give rise to materials that are highly colored, hindering
possibilities to study cell behavior in an evolving mechanical environment
during 3D culture. These roadblocks thus call for new alternatives
to enable spatiotemporal control over their mechanics while permitting
visualization by microscopic methods.We earlier reported the
formation of cytocompatible hydrogel materials
from tripodal squaramide-based monomers that self-assemble into supramolecular
filaments.[45] Squaramides are minimalistic
hydrogen bonding synthons that contain two C=O acceptors opposite
two N–H donors on cyclobutenedione.[46] When embedded within the hydrophobic domain of a flexible amphiphile,
they hydrogen bond with one another in a head-to-tail hydrogen bonding
array to form supramolecular polymers.[47−50] Above a critical monomer concentration,
soft and self-recovering hydrogels can be prepared, and their co-assembly
with RGD-outfitted monomers influences cellular adhesion and proliferation.[51] In order to modulate the hydrogel mechanics
spatiotemporally as encountered in the ECM in vivo during disease, light-mediated cross-linking is a valuable strategy.
We herein report the synthesis of a UV light-reactive squaramide-based
monomer containing 1,2-dithiolanes, examine its co-assembly to prepare
fully synthetic, non-proteolytic supramolecular hydrogels that exhibit
complex mechanical characteristics, and explore their modulation with
light in space and time for applications in 3D cell culture.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis of Tripodal Squaramide-Based Monomers
SQ, SQ-DT, and
SQ-RGD
To prepare supramolecular hydrogels whose properties
can be modulated in space and time in 3D cell culture, a multicomponent
approach is necessary to be able to cross-link the materials and provide
bioactive cues. The native tripodal squaramide gelator, SQ, consists of a hydrophobic domain with three squaramide moieties
attached to a tris(2-aminoethylamine) (TREN) core and aliphatic chains,
and a hydrophilic domain composed of tetraethyleneglycol chains to
guide its self-assembly into fibrillar supramolecular polymers and
gel phase materials in water (Figure A).[45] A second monomer, SQ-DT, containing a cross-linkable 1,2-dithiolane (DT) moiety
on the periphery of the amphiphile was also prepared starting from
methyl asparagusic acid to engender cross-linking between supramolecular
polymers. Photoactivation of the DT moiety is achieved at the maximum
of its absorbance peak at 330 nm.[52−55] Finally, a third squaramide monomer, SQ-RGD, was synthesized where one arm of SQ was
modified with an RGD peptide, to engage integrin receptors on the
cell surface to the supramolecular material.[51] Synthetic procedures for SQ-DT and SQ-RGD can be found in the Supporting Information.
Figure 1
(A) Chemical structures of tripodal squaramide-based monomers (SQ, SQ-DT, and SQ-RGD) and a fluorescein-labeled
cell-adhesive RGD peptide ((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) used to prepare multicomponent supramolecular hydrogels for 3D
cell culture. (B) Schematic representation of the on-demand mechanical
modulation of the multicomponent supramolecular materials (SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD) (the numerical value denotes mole percentage) through light-activated
1,2-dithiolane cross-linking and its effect on cell migration in 3D.
(C) Schematic representation of the spatial and temporal photopatterning
of the bioactive RGD peptide (fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) in SQ-DT hydrogels through a photomask or direct laser
writing, and the associated cell morphologies (round or spread). In
the case of photomask illumination, UV irradiation was applied using
a benchtop LED source (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm). The
orange dashed line indicates cross-linking of the 1,2-dithiolane units
in the supramolecular materials.
(A) Chemical structures of tripodal squaramide-based monomers (SQ, SQ-DT, and SQ-RGD) and a fluorescein-labeled
cell-adhesive RGD peptide ((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) used to prepare multicomponent supramolecular hydrogels for 3D
cell culture. (B) Schematic representation of the on-demand mechanical
modulation of the multicomponent supramolecular materials (SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD) (the numerical value denotes mole percentage) through light-activated
1,2-dithiolane cross-linking and its effect on cell migration in 3D.
(C) Schematic representation of the spatial and temporal photopatterning
of the bioactive RGD peptide (fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) in SQ-DT hydrogels through a photomask or direct laser
writing, and the associated cell morphologies (round or spread). In
the case of photomask illumination, UV irradiation was applied using
a benchtop LED source (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm). The
orange dashed line indicates cross-linking of the 1,2-dithiolane units
in the supramolecular materials.
We previously
demonstrated that the monomer SQ can form
transparent hydrogels through sonication and has a critical gelation
concentration (CGC) in the range of 4.0–4.6 mM in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS).[45] In contrast, the SQ-DT monomer containing the DT group is insoluble in deionized
water or PBS (pH 7.4), even at low concentrations (0.1 mM). Thus,
a co-assembly strategy was devised to prepare the supramolecular hydrogels
containing monomers SQ and SQ-DT (see the Supporting Information). To obtain the required
concentration and volume of the final multicomponent hydrogels SQ/ (x: molar percent
of SQ-DT), DMSO stock solutions of SQ (10.0
mM) and SQ-DT (10.0 mM) were first mixed in the appropriate
ratio followed by removal of DMSO using a stream of nitrogen or air
overnight to yield a dried film. Co-sonication of pre-made SQ/10SQ-DT mixed monomers in an ice bath (∼0 °C) resulted in the
formation of a clear solution that was then incubated at 37 °C
for 15 min and at room temperature overnight, providing transparent
hydrogels with a reduced CGC value (0.4–1.0 mM) (Figure S1). Further increasing the molar percentage
of SQ-DT to 20 mol % resulted in a slightly turbid solution
after sonication and later an opaque gel. Hereafter, we use the mixture SQ/10SQ-DT, consisting of 10 mol % of SQ-DT with
the remainder being the native monomer SQ, to understand
the range by which the hydrogel mechanics can be tuned by light.
Modulation of the Mechanical Properties of Supramolecular Materials
Using UV Light
The mechanical properties of two-component
supramolecular hydrogels in PBS (pH 7.4) with or without light exposure
were measured by oscillatory rheology at room temperature. Soft supramolecular
hydrogels (SQ/10SQ-DT) were prepared through sonication
and left to stand overnight resulting in a range of storage moduli
(G′), from 5.9 ± 0.4 to 440 ± 34
Pa when the total monomer concentration was increased from 1.0 to
12.0 mM (Figure S2). The hydrogels were
then further stiffened with the application of UV light (∼10
mW/cm2, 320 to 500 nm with a primary peak at 365 nm) remaining
optically clear and colorless. The stiffening of the soft hydrogel
could be achieved efficiently in less than 10 min and without the
use of a photoinitiator. For example, a G′
of 17490 ± 1748 Pa was achieved when a total monomer concentration
of 12.0 mM with 1.2 mM SQ-DT was used (Figure A,B). UV irradiation-induced
cross-linking of DT is likely responsible for the abrupt increase
in hydrogel stiffness; the ring opening of the DT moiety with light
in the multicomponent squaramide-based supramolecular materials was
confirmed by solid-state NMR experiments against a covalent polymer PEGdiDT control (Figures S13 and S14).[54]
Figure 2
Oscillatory rheological measurements:
(A) Averaged (N ≥ 3) time sweep measurements
of the hydrogel system (SQ/10SQ-DT) with varied monomer
concentrations using 10 min
UV irradiation with fixed strain amplitude (γ = 0.05%) and frequency
(f = 1.0 Hz) at room temperature. (B) Storage modulus
(G′) at plateau of SQ/10SQ-DT (1.0–12.0 mM) hydrogels with and without 10 min UV irradiation.
(C) Time sweep measurements of SQ/10SQ-DT (8.0 mM) hydrogels
with UV light applied in a stepwise manner at room temperature. (D)
Averaged (N ≥ 3) strain sweep and step-strain
experiments of SQ/10SQ-DT (8.0 mM) with and without 10
min UV irradiation. (E) Differential modulus, K′,
as a function of stress in SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) hydrogels
with increasing UV irradiation time (0, 1, 3, and 10 min). (F) Stress
relaxation measurements (1% strain) of SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0
mM) hydrogels with increasing UV irradiation time (0, 1, 3, and 10
min). (G) Creep and recovery tests of the SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0
mM) hydrogels with and without UV irradiation (0 and 3 min). A constant
stress of 5 Pa was used during the creep test. Conditions for UV irradiation:
∼10 mW/cm2, 320–500 nm filter with maximum
absorbance at 365 nm. The shaded areas indicate time periods during
which the sample was irradiated by the light source. The error bars
were calculated as the standard deviation of repeat measurements (N ≥ 3).
Oscillatory rheological measurements:
(A) Averaged (N ≥ 3) time sweep measurements
of the hydrogel system (SQ/10SQ-DT) with varied monomer
concentrations using 10 min
UV irradiation with fixed strain amplitude (γ = 0.05%) and frequency
(f = 1.0 Hz) at room temperature. (B) Storage modulus
(G′) at plateau of SQ/10SQ-DT (1.0–12.0 mM) hydrogels with and without 10 min UV irradiation.
(C) Time sweep measurements of SQ/10SQ-DT (8.0 mM) hydrogels
with UV light applied in a stepwise manner at room temperature. (D)
Averaged (N ≥ 3) strain sweep and step-strain
experiments of SQ/10SQ-DT (8.0 mM) with and without 10
min UV irradiation. (E) Differential modulus, K′,
as a function of stress in SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) hydrogels
with increasing UV irradiation time (0, 1, 3, and 10 min). (F) Stress
relaxation measurements (1% strain) of SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0
mM) hydrogels with increasing UV irradiation time (0, 1, 3, and 10
min). (G) Creep and recovery tests of the SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0
mM) hydrogels with and without UV irradiation (0 and 3 min). A constant
stress of 5 Pa was used during the creep test. Conditions for UV irradiation:
∼10 mW/cm2, 320–500 nm filter with maximum
absorbance at 365 nm. The shaded areas indicate time periods during
which the sample was irradiated by the light source. The error bars
were calculated as the standard deviation of repeat measurements (N ≥ 3).The potential to further
modulate the mechanical properties of
hydrogels (SQ/10SQ-DT) by varying UV light intensity
and irradiation time was then examined. Increasing the light intensity
from ∼5.0 to ∼20.0 mW/cm2 decreased the time
to reach a plateau in the G′ from ∼8
to ∼6 min. All light intensities applied yielded a comparable G′ when given enough time (e.g., 10 min) for photo-cross-linking
to occur (Figure S4). However, the duration
of light exposure was found to affect the final G′ value at the same light intensity (10 mW/cm2).
A small G′ value (1255 ± 110 Pa) was
observed when only a short irradiation time (e.g., 20 s) was used,
whereas a higher final G′ value (8704 ±
1045 Pa) was achieved with longer UV irradiation times (e.g., 10 and
30 min) (Figure S5). Most importantly for
cell culture applications, this dependence on irradiation time implies
that the G′ of the supramolecular hydrogel
can be controlled in a stepwise manner, opening the door for applications
that require spatial or temporal control over hydrogel properties
(Figure C).Step-strain experiments were performed to examine the self-recovery
properties of the supramolecular polymer networks before and after
UV irradiation. At an oscillation frequency of 1 Hz, a high strain
amplitude (500%), outside of its linear viscoelastic range, was first
applied for 120 s followed by the application of a low strain amplitude
(0.05%) for another 120 s, and then the cycle was repeated. The recovery
of G′ in all the hydrogels tested before UV
irradiation was between 80 and 100% of their initial state (Figure S6). After 10 min of UV irradiation, the
hydrogels still showed some self-recovery, although to a lesser extent
than before UV irradiation (Figure S6).
Taking the 8.0 mM SQ/10SQ-DT sample as an example, the G′ before UV irradiation recovered ∼93% of
its initial G′ value, while the same hydrogel
after 10 min of UV irradiation returned to ∼60% of the total
(Figure D). Ellman’s
assay was performed to estimate the concentration of free thiols that
could facilitate a thiol-disulfide exchange at room temperature to
gain insight into the reduced self-recovery of the supramolecular
hydrogels.[55] After UV irradiation (5 and
10 min) (Figures S15–S18 and Table S1), an increase in absorbance was recorded
at 412 nm for both solutions and hydrogels prepared from the supramolecular
polymers, indicating an increase in the concentration of free thiols
(from ∼0.0043 to ∼0.44 μM with 10 min UV exposure).
These results are in contrast to earlier observations for covalent
polymer hydrogel networks[56] where gels
with increased free thiol content showed an increase in self-recovery
properties. Because the SQ-DT monomer accounts for only
10 mol % of the entire network, the material largely retains its capacity
to recover in response to high strain after UV exposure, which is
likely due to the physical interactions between filaments.To
compare the mechanical properties of the squaramide-based supramolecular
materials to the biopolymer networks that compose the ECM used in
cell culture, we characterized their nonlinear elasticity, viscoelasticity,
and viscoplasticity. Their capacity to exhibit nonlinear elastic behavior
was determined from a pre-stress measurement[57] in the rheometer to obtain the differential modulus K′ = dσ/dγ as a function of stress, σ. At
low stresses in SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) prior to UV light
exposure, a linear trend in the data was observed with a constant K′ equal to the plateau modulus, G0. Once the critical stress, σc, was
reached at 5 Pa, an increase in K′ occurred
(Figure E), as observed
in many biopolymer networks.[58] Irradiation
with UV light for 1, 3, and 10 min resulted in an increase in the G0 and a higher σc, namely,
9.5, 29, and 35 Pa, respectively (Figure E and Figures S7 and S8). The decreased sensitivity toward stress for the cross-linked
samples is expected, as increased material stiffness is often strongly
correlated with a higher onset of nonlinearity. Subsequently, the
viscoelasticity of SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) was evaluated
by measuring stress relaxation at a strain of 1%. Prior to UV irradiation,
the hydrogel relaxed 55% of its initial stress in the measured time
range of 5000 s, while after irradiation with UV light for 10 min,
the hydrogel relaxed only 20% of the initial stress in the same time
frame (Figure F).
Moreover, the stress relaxation rate of the hydrogel prior to cross-linking
falls within the timescales of soft tissues that show more viscoelastic
solid character.[22] As plastic behavior
can be observed in viscoelastic materials, the viscoplasticity of SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) was examined using creep and recovery
tests (Figure G and Figure S9).[20,59] The degree
of plasticity of the gel was found to be 48 ± 7% prior to cross-linking,
and decreased to 13 ± 5% after irradiation with UV light for
3 min, indicating that the plastic component of the supramolecular
hydrogel decreased substantially with increased cross-link density.
These results coincide with previous rheological findings on collagen
hydrogels that show slower relaxation rates and decreasing degrees
of plasticity with increased cross-linking.[20,60]We further evaluated the suitability of the supramolecular
materials
for cell culture experiments by examining the stability and diffusion
of macromolecules in the network. First, the stability of the UV-irradiated SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) hydrogel was assessed after incubation
at 37 °C with PBS (pH 7.4) or cell culture medium (DMEM containing
20% v/v serum) at different time points. The G′
of the PBS or DMEM swollen hydrogels after the same UV exposure (∼10
mW/cm2, 10 min) were comparable before and after incubation
(e.g., days 1, 3, and 7) (Figure S10).
This result indicates that the SQ-DT hydrogels remain
stable prior to UV irradiation and can be stiffened on-demand during
culture. The potential for diffusion of molecules of various molecular
weights (e.g., fluoresceinamine Mw = 0.347 kDa, and FITC-dextran Mw
≈ 10 and 70 kDa) through the supramolecular hydrogels was evaluated
using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) before and
after UV irradiation (5 min). The various molecules were found to
diffuse freely within hydrogels of two different stiffnesses at cell
culture relevant timescales (Figure S19 and Table S2). Thus, the gels were considered both sufficiently porous
and stable for subsequent 3D cell culture experiments.
Structural
Characterization of Supramolecular Materials before
and after the Application of UV Light
Cryogenic transmission
electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) was performed to image the features
of the formed supramolecular networks at the nanoscale. As shown in Figure S20, the imaged supramolecular hydrogels
(2.0 mM SQ/10SQ-DT) before and after 10 min UV irradiation
both presented flexible, entangled filaments at the micrometer scale.
However, there was no remarkable change in the filament width under
the various conditions: 4.5 ± 0.9 and 3.8 ± 0.8 nm before
and after 10 min UV irradiation, respectively (inset figures in Figure S20). To further probe changes within
the filaments at smaller length scales in solution and in the gel
phase, small-angle X-ray scattering experiments (SAXS) were conducted
on the supramolecular materials. The q–1 slope of the scattering profiles is consistent with the formation
of high-aspect-ratio 1D aggregates, and a form factor of flexible
cylinders was best fit to the scattering data, yielding a filament
radius of ∼2.4 nm (Figure S21).
Moreover, on examination of the scattered light intensity across the
entire q-range (Figure ) for two different concentrations (e.g.,
0.8 and 2.0 mM), insignificant changes to the filamentous aggregates
before and after UV irradiation were observed, in line with cryo-TEM
imaging. These results show that UV-light-mediated 1,2-dithiolane
cross-linking does not perturb the nanoscale structure of the filaments
and strongly suggest that the origin of the large changes in rheological
properties is largely due to interfilament cross-linking.
Figure 3
SAXS profiles
of different concentrations of supramolecular hydrogels SQ/10SQ-DT before (filled circles) and after (empty circles)
UV irradiation for 5 min: (A) 0.8 and (B) 2.0 mM.
SAXS profiles
of different concentrations of supramolecular hydrogels SQ/10SQ-DT before (filled circles) and after (empty circles)
UV irradiation for 5 min: (A) 0.8 and (B) 2.0 mM.
Cell Viability after Light-Mediated Secondary Cross-linking
of Squaramide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogels
We previously
demonstrated that our soft squaramide-based supramolecular hydrogels
consisting of the native SQ monomer are cytocompatible,
encapsulating several cell types in 3D.[45] Expanding on this previous work, we herein examine the effect of
incorporating DT and applying UV irradiation on cell viability. Three
different cell lines were selected to evaluate the cytocompatibility
of the supramolecular hydrogel (NIH 3T3 fibroblasts, Hs578T
breast cancer cells, and C2C12 myoblasts). Cell suspensions were readily
mixed with SQ-DT hydrogel (Figure B) and then left to incubate followed by
staining with calcein AM and PI. Fluorescence microscopy showed that
a homogeneous dispersion of the cell suspension is achieved in 3D
after seeding (Figure S22A). After 24 h
of culture, LIVE/DEAD assays were performed on the cell-laden hydrogels
with and without UV irradiation (5 min, 375 nm at ∼10 mW/cm2). Without UV irradiation, 92 ± 4% of NIH 3 T3 cells,
93 ± 1% of Hs578T cells, and 89 ± 3% of C2C12 cells were
viable (Figure S22B). With 5 min UV irradiation
(immediately after seeding) and staining after 24 h culture, the percentage
of viable cells decreased slightly to 85 ± 4%–90 ±
2% for all lines tested. Moreover, increasing the concentration of SQ-DT resulted in decreased cell viability if UV light was
applied immediately after seeding, most notably for the C2C12 cell
line (see Figure S23, for 8.0 mM SQ, 8.0 mM SQ/5SQ-DT, and 8.0 mM SQ/10SQ-DT). Longer incubation times (>4 h) of the cells in the materials
prior
to UV irradiation were found to mitigate the negative effect of high SQ-DT concentration. This negative effect is likely due to
the higher thiyl radical concentration, which is in line with earlier
reports for other radical chemistries.[61−63] In the experiments below,
a sufficiently low concentration (4.0 mM SQ/10SQ-DT)
was chosen for photo-induced stiffening experiments during cell culture,
balancing cell viability and the desired mechanical stiffening of
the hydrogel.
Hs578T Breast Cancer Cells Show Phenotypic
Changes Consistent
with Secondary Cross-linking of the Supramolecular Materials
Once the cell viability and the various mechanical features of the
squaramide-based networks before and after UV irradiation were assayed,
the next step was to examine the capacity to remotely modulate material
stiffness during 3D cell culture and readout changes in cell behavior.
We selected a highly invasive and metastatic breast cancer cell line
(Hs578T), because of our interest to use our materials to model the
spatiotemporal changes in ECM mechanics in the progression of cancer in vitro. Invasive cancer cell types generate sufficient
mechanical force through their invadopodia to puncture through the
basement membrane independent of proteolysis and thus remodel this
matrix in a force-mediated manner.[59] To
enable cells to exert cellular traction on the supramolecular material,
we further introduced an additional squaramide monomer bearing an
RGD peptide, SQ-RGD, into the SQ/10SQ-DT hydrogel. Our earlier work showed that the optimal balance between
cell adhesion and material stability was found to be at 10 mol % of
the RGD peptide,[51] and based on this result,
we opted for this percentage to prepare the multicomponent squaramide
hydrogel SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD for subsequent cell culture
assays. The effect of cross-linking the hydrogels on cell behavior
was studied in 2D and 3D, comparing cell morphologies before and after
UV exposure. Additionally, cross-linking of the materials during culture
was performed to evaluate cell behavior in the context of an already
established but changing mechanical environment.As a first
step, mCherry-LifeAct Hs578T breast cancer cells were seeded on top
of the SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) hydrogel to study
cell morphology in response to material stiffening. The 2D assay facilitates
readout of cell behavior in the context of changing material stiffness
because interferences from other physical parameters that do play
an important role in 3D, such as the micropore architecture and plasticity,
are absent.[64,65] Cells on top of the UV-stiffened
network spread significantly more in contrast to those on non-UV-exposed
substrates after 6 h (Figure A,B, Figures S24 and S25, and Table S3), consistent with previous studies that
found the cell area to expand with increased stiffness in 2D.[66] Furthermore, the cells showed increased front-rear
polarity on the UV-irradiated supramolecular hydrogel, a feature critical
for tissue formation and directed cell migration,[67] whereas they maintained a mostly round morphology on the
non-UV-irradiated substrate. The increased polarity of cells on UV-exposed
hydrogel is reflected by the measured decrease in the averages of
both the aspect ratio (from 0.68 ± 0.02 to 0.56 ± 0.02)
and circularity (from 0.89 ± 0.02 to 0.68 ± 0.03). The change
in cell polarity is a result of the increase in stiffness of SQ/10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) hydrogel from 88 ± 11 to 1100 ±
112 Pa (Figure B);
a Young’s modulus exceeding 1000 Pa was earlier reported to
be the effective lower limit to achieve front-rear polarity in 2D.[68,69]
Figure 4
(A)–(D)
Quantitative analyses of 2D and 3D culture of mCherry-LifeAct
Hs578T cells in SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) hydrogels
with different UV irradiation durations (0 and 5 min): (A) cell circularity
and (B) aspect ratio after 6 h in 2D culture; (C) cell circularity
and (D) aspect ratio after 3 days in 3D culture. The mean and standard
deviation are marked within the figures (**** p <
0.0001 one-way ANOVA). (E) and (F) Representative high-resolution
images of mCherry-LifeAct Hs578T cells after 3 days culture in 3D
in SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) hydrogels with different
UV irradiation durations: (E) 0 min or (F) 5 min. Scale bar: 10 μm.
UV light was applied through a benchtop LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm).
(A)–(D)
Quantitative analyses of 2D and 3D culture of mCherry-LifeAct
Hs578T cells in SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) hydrogels
with different UV irradiation durations (0 and 5 min): (A) cell circularity
and (B) aspect ratio after 6 h in 2D culture; (C) cell circularity
and (D) aspect ratio after 3 days in 3D culture. The mean and standard
deviation are marked within the figures (**** p <
0.0001 one-way ANOVA). (E) and (F) Representative high-resolution
images of mCherry-LifeAct Hs578T cells after 3 days culture in 3D
in SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) hydrogels with different
UV irradiation durations: (E) 0 min or (F) 5 min. Scale bar: 10 μm.
UV light was applied through a benchtop LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm).After establishing cell
behavior on the supramolecular materials
with light-mediated changes in 2D, we moved to their culture in 3D
where a strikingly different cell response was observed (Figure C–F, Figures S26–S28, Table S4, and Videos 1 and 2). Prior to
UV irradiation, the material is soft (∼40 Pa) and highly plastic
(48 ± 7%) and the encapsulated cells in 3D culture are elongated,
often showing branched protrusions (Figure E) with, on average, a low aspect ratio of
0.55 ± 0.059 and a circularity of 0.70 ± 0.079 (Figure C,D and Table S4). The morphological features of the
cells under this 3D condition are congruent with earlier reports involving
materials formed through weak interactions and possessing complex
mechanical characteristics.[17,70] From confocal microscopy
images, the cells were observed to remodel the non-proteolytic supramolecular
materials by first forming protrusions and then channels (Figure E and Figure S28). In sharp contrast, when the materials
were exposed to UV light (375 nm) for 5 min, increasing their stiffness
(G′ ≈ 600 Pa) and decreasing their
plasticity (13 ± 5%), cell circularity increased to 0.98 ±
0.044 and the capability of the cells to form protrusions or elongate
was observed to diminish (Figure F, Figure S28, and Table S4). The reduction of protrusions and thus a more rounded cell shape
in 3D has been earlier observed by Chaudhuri and co-workers when the
materials’ plasticity was decreased and the stiffness was increased.[20] The changes in cell morphology due to changing
the mechanical environment with UV exposure are inversed for the 2D
and 3D assays. In 3D, cell spreading is significantly reduced in a
stiffened and less plastic hydrogel (see Figure C,D), whereas in 2D, cell spreading is increased
with the stiffness of the surface (see Figure A,B). The opposite behavior in these two
culture formats highlights the need to examine mechanical features
of filamentous supramolecular matrices beyond stiffness on moving
from 2D to 3D as they are also modified on cross-linking and can impact
cell spreading and motility.We examined the potential for the
supramolecular material to mimic
the temporal changes in mechanical properties that occur in the ECM in vivo by cross-linking the supramolecular network with
UV light in the middle of a 3-day culture period (Figure ). Initially the cells were
observed to spread, elongate, and migrate through the soft and highly
plastic supramolecular gel SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM)
as evidenced by recorded cell trajectories during confocal time-lapse
imaging for 24–48 h (Figure B, see Video 3 in the Supporting Information). Prior to photo-cross-linking,
the cells were maximally displaced to 59 ± 12 μm with a
speed of 21 ± 3.5 μm/h on average. Subsequently, the cell–gel
mixture was exposed to UV light mid-culture, and the same positions
were imaged for another 24 h to follow changes in phenotype (Figure C, time-lapse microscopy
for 48–72 h, see Video 4 in the Supporting Information). The cells maintained
their spread appearance and polarization, but the capacity of mCherry-LifeAct
Hs578T to migrate through the stiffer and less plastic supramolecular
hydrogel was impeded, as maximal cell displacement dropped to 27 ±
6.0 μm with an average speed of 15 ± 2.7 μm/h. The
mean-squared displacement (MSD), a measure of space explored over
time, of the cell center sharply decreases after UV-stiffening (Figure D), further confirming
that the cells lose their ability to easily migrate through the gel.
Although the cells can backtrack through hydrogel channels created
in the first 48 h of the experiment (e.g., Figure E), the less plastic and stiffened hydrogel
after photo-cross-linking constrains their motion primarily along
the earlier made tracks. The cells still attempt to form protrusions
into the material, but its change in mechanical properties prevents
the migration into the unexplored areas of the hydrogel.
Figure 5
(A) Schematic
representation of the UV light application timeline
for secondary cross-linking of the supramolecular materials in cell
culture experiments (0–72 h). Representations of mCherry-LifeAct
Hs578T cell trajectories within multicomponent hydrogels SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) before and after the application of UV light: (B) cells
(N = 64) traced 24–48 h within hydrogel (0
min UV light) and (C) cells (N = 68) traced for 48–72
h after 5 min UV light. (D) Mean-squared displacement (MSD) of the
tracked trajectories within the hydrogels (+/– UV light). (E)
Effect of the RGD peptide (+/– RGD) and changes in hydrogel
stiffness caused by UV light (+/– UV) on the max displacement
per cell. UV light was applied using a benchtop LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm).
(A) Schematic
representation of the UV light application timeline
for secondary cross-linking of the supramolecular materials in cell
culture experiments (0–72 h). Representations of mCherry-LifeAct
Hs578T cell trajectories within multicomponent hydrogels SQ/10SQ-DT/10SQ-RGD (4.0 mM) before and after the application of UV light: (B) cells
(N = 64) traced 24–48 h within hydrogel (0
min UV light) and (C) cells (N = 68) traced for 48–72
h after 5 min UV light. (D) Mean-squared displacement (MSD) of the
tracked trajectories within the hydrogels (+/– UV light). (E)
Effect of the RGD peptide (+/– RGD) and changes in hydrogel
stiffness caused by UV light (+/– UV) on the max displacement
per cell. UV light was applied using a benchtop LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm).To assess the importance
of RGD-mediated cell–gel adhesion
during cell migration in the material, the photo-cross-linking of
the mCherry-LifeAct Hs578T cell-laden hydrogel SQ10SQ-DT (4.0 mM) was performed without incorporating the RGD peptide (Figure S29). The cells still tried to form protrusions
but lost the ability to manipulate the gel reliably leading to a largely
rounded morphology. This finding highlights the importance of incorporating
the RGD peptide to target integrin receptors on the cell surface and
thereby enable force-mediated remodeling of the supramolecular material.
During the 24 h culture in hydrogel lacking RGD and pre-UV irradiation,
the Hs578T cells do not displace more than one cell-length (Figure E) in the gel on
average. However, the cell center-of-mass is in continuous motion
as the cells probe their physical environment. When irradiated with
UV light at 48 h, the cells in SQ10SQ-DT are hindered
further (Figure E)
with protrusions no longer being formed. These results point out that
cells encapsulated in a non-proteolytic matrix need a material with
specific mechanical characteristics to migrate successfully and efficiently.
The physical environment surrounding a cell needs to be below a critical
stiffness value and accessible to deformation, for example through
integrin binding to RGD peptides. Then, with an adequate degree of
plasticity, the cells can successfully invade the material. Overall,
we demonstrate that light-mediated cross-linking of the filamentous
supramolecular materials can be used to control cell morphology in
2D and 3D and migration in 3D through a decrease in material plasticity.
Spatial and Temporal Patterning of Bioactive Cues in Supramolecular
Materials Containing 1,2-Dithiolanes Using UV Light
We further
explored the possibility for spatiotemporal patterning of bioactive
cues in supramolecular materials to mimic the heterogeneity of tissues in vivo. Fluorescent ((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS[54] and non-fluorescent ((DT)GGGRGDS (DT-RGD)) RGD peptides with a DT moiety were synthesized
to enable photopatterning using either a photomask or direct laser
writing (DLW) (Figure A). The efficiency of binding of the RGD peptide to SQ/10SQ-DT hydrogel by UV irradiation was found to be around 20% for samples
of different RGD concentrations (Figure S31), after homogenous UV exposure using a benchtop LED (5 min, ∼10
mW/cm2, 375 nm). Spatial patterning of the RGD peptide
was then achieved by placing a photomask between the hydrogel and
the LED. Using confocal microscopy, the UV-exposed volume of the hydrogel
was visualized (Figure B) and the concentration of the bound RGD peptide was estimated to
be 0.8 μM from a 10 μM concentration of RGD peptide that
was initially applied (Figure S32). In
addition to benchtop photopatterning, fully 3D-patterned volumes at
cell-size relevant length scales were achieved by two-photon direct
laser writing into the hydrogel (Figure C). The concentration of bound RGD was observed
to sharply increase in patterned areas compared with unpatterned areas
(Figure S33). This experiment further highlights
the potential for spatial and/or temporal control of the network properties
by introducing RGD peptides at specific locations and changes to the
physical properties of the network in a user-defined manner through
the 1,2-dithiolane moiety.
Figure 6
(A) Spatial and temporal patterning of a fluorescent
RGD peptide
((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) within the SQ/10SQ-DT (6.0 mM) hydrogel using a photomask or two-photon laser lithography.
(B) 3D confocal fluorescence images of the fluorescent RGD peptide
patterned hydrogel using a photomask with 5 min UV light from a benchtop
LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm). Scale bar: 200 μm.
(C) Confocal microscopy images of a fluorescent hollow cube prepared
by two-photon direct laser writing (DLW) using a fluorescent RGD peptide.
Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Confocal images of C2C12 cells after a
3 day culture period in the SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) hydrogel
where RGD or DRG peptides were coupled by UV light: DT-RGD (0.4 mM) with (i) 5 min and (ii) 0 min UV irradiation; DT-DGR (0.4 mM) with (iii) 5 min and (iv) 0 min UV irradiation. Scale bar:
100 μm. C2C12 cells were stained with calcein AM (viable cells,
green) and PI (dead cells, red). (E) Representative confocal image
(z-stack projection) of encapsulated C2C12 cells after 3 days of culture
in the SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) hydrogel patterned with a
photomask using 5 min UV irradiation from a benchtop LED. The hydrogel
contains DT-RGD (0.399 mM) and a fluorescent RGD peptide
((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) (0.001 mM) with a total
RGD peptide concentration of 0.4 mM. Scale bar: 250 μm. Cells
were stained with phalloidin to visualize F-actin, and the green areas
indicate the RGD-patterned area. (F) Distribution of circularity of
C2C12 cells in the RGD-patterned (green) and unpatterned (black) areas
from panel E.
(A) Spatial and temporal patterning of a fluorescent
RGD peptide
((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) within the SQ/10SQ-DT (6.0 mM) hydrogel using a photomask or two-photon laser lithography.
(B) 3D confocal fluorescence images of the fluorescent RGD peptide
patterned hydrogel using a photomask with 5 min UV light from a benchtop
LED (∼10 mW/cm2, 375 nm). Scale bar: 200 μm.
(C) Confocal microscopy images of a fluorescent hollow cube prepared
by two-photon direct laser writing (DLW) using a fluorescent RGD peptide.
Scale bar: 50 μm. (D) Confocal images of C2C12 cells after a
3 day culture period in the SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) hydrogel
where RGD or DRG peptides were coupled by UV light: DT-RGD (0.4 mM) with (i) 5 min and (ii) 0 min UV irradiation; DT-DGR (0.4 mM) with (iii) 5 min and (iv) 0 min UV irradiation. Scale bar:
100 μm. C2C12 cells were stained with calcein AM (viable cells,
green) and PI (dead cells, red). (E) Representative confocal image
(z-stack projection) of encapsulated C2C12 cells after 3 days of culture
in the SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) hydrogel patterned with a
photomask using 5 min UV irradiation from a benchtop LED. The hydrogel
contains DT-RGD (0.399 mM) and a fluorescent RGD peptide
((fluorescein)GK(DT)GGGRGDS) (0.001 mM) with a total
RGD peptide concentration of 0.4 mM. Scale bar: 250 μm. Cells
were stained with phalloidin to visualize F-actin, and the green areas
indicate the RGD-patterned area. (F) Distribution of circularity of
C2C12 cells in the RGD-patterned (green) and unpatterned (black) areas
from panel E.
Photopatterned Cell-Adhesive
Peptides in Supramolecular Materials
Modulate Cell Morphology
To assess how RGD peptide-patterned
supramolecular materials can spatially guide cell behavior, the morphology
of C2C12 cells was quantified after 3D encapsulation in hydrogels
that were uniformly exposed to UV light and patterned (Figure D). Most of the calcein AM-stained
C2C12 cells showed a spread morphology with branched protrusions in
the SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) hydrogel with the DT-RGD peptide (0.4 mM) that was uniformly exposed to UV light. The stiffness
of the supramolecular hydrogel in these regions is estimated to be G′ = 190 Pa from rheological measurements and is
still low enough for changes in cell morphology to be observed in
3D in the materials with RGD. In contrast, cells remained round when
encapsulated in the same hydrogel without UV light and thus without
access to the RGD peptide, or when the same concentration of a scrambled
control peptide DT-DGR was used. To investigate cell
morphology in a spatially patterned supramolecular hydrogel, SQ/10SQ-DT (3.0 mM) was mixed with a 0.4 mM peptide solution
of DT-RGD and a small amount of (fluorescein)GK( (for visualization of the photopatterned
regions). C2C12 myoblasts were then seeded in 3D in the SQ/10SQ-DT/DT-RGD hydrogel and subsequently photopatterned using a photomask and benchtop
LED. Finally, the hydrogel was washed with PBS and DMEM, left to incubate
for 3 days, and imaged (Figure E). Cell circularity was quantified in both the RGD-patterned
(green) and unpatterned (black) areas using a phalloidin stain for
actin visualization (Figure F and Table S5); C2C12 cells showed
an average decrease in circularity from 0.906 ± 0.023 to 0.805
± 0.019 for RGD-patterned and unpatterned areas in the same hydrogel,
respectively. Similar results were obtained for mCherry-LifeAct Hs578T
cells (Figure S34 and Table S6). Although
the RGD peptide can be introduced into the supramolecular hydrogel
network by chemical cross-linking of the DT-RGD peptide
using UV light, the mechanical properties are also likely simultaneously
altered in these regions due to the photoreaction of the DT unit in
the gel (see rheology data from Figure S11). Hence, we demonstrate that the light-mediated ligation of DT-RGD in the supramolecular hydrogels (SQ/10SQ-DT) can be a generic strategy for their post-functionalization with
bioactive cues, even during culture.
Conclusions
We
show that a supramolecular monomer end-functionalized with light-activatable
1,2-dithiolane (DT) moieties can provide a handle to engineer the
mechanics of supramolecular materials spatiotemporally in 3D cell
culture. Exceptionally, the stiffness of the supramolecular hydrogels
could be increased to >10 kPa with UV irradiation (365–375
nm) in the absence of a photoinitiator, pointing to the cross-linking
of their filaments in the materials. After UV cross-linking, the hydrogels
retain clarity and colorlessness that is advantageous for light microscopy
and show potential for self-recovery due to the combination of the
non-covalent and disulfide-based covalent cross-links present from
the co-assembly of both monomers. The soft materials further exhibit
nonlinear, viscoelastic, and viscoplastic properties prior to UV irradiation,
which are conducive to being manipulated by cells enabling protrusion
formation and cell migration when RGD-outfitted monomers are included.
These complex mechanical characteristics can be modulated or shut
down during culture with UV exposure in a user-defined manner. Importantly,
photo-cross-linking reinforces the networks such that the cells can
no longer plastically deform the non-proteolytic supramolecular materials
by force-mediated remodeling and primarily move along earlier made
tracks. Moreover, their mechanical properties can be temporally controlled
in a stepwise manner, and bioactive cues, such as the RGD peptide,
can be introduced spatially in 3D by photopatterning with a photomask
or direct laser writing. Excitingly, this approach opens the door
for programmed heterogeneity and shaping at multiple time- and length
scales in filamentous supramolecular biomaterials to mimic mechanical
phenomena that occur in the ECM during development and disease for in vitro studies of cell behavior.
Authors: Katherine Margulis; Xiangyi Zhang; Lydia-Marie Joubert; Karsten Bruening; Christopher J Tassone; Richard N Zare; Robert M Waymouth Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Victorio Saez Talens; Pablo Englebienne; Thuat T Trinh; Willem E M Noteborn; Ilja K Voets; Roxanne E Kieltyka Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Kandice R Levental; Hongmei Yu; Laura Kass; Johnathon N Lakins; Mikala Egeblad; Janine T Erler; Sheri F T Fong; Katalin Csiszar; Amato Giaccia; Wolfgang Weninger; Mitsuo Yamauchi; David L Gasser; Valerie M Weaver Journal: Cell Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ciqing Tong; Tingxian Liu; Victorio Saez Talens; Willem E M Noteborn; Thomas H Sharp; Marco M R M Hendrix; Ilja K Voets; Christine L Mummery; Valeria V Orlova; Roxanne E Kieltyka Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Sudhir Khetan; Murat Guvendiren; Wesley R Legant; Daniel M Cohen; Christopher S Chen; Jason A Burdick Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2013-03-24 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Simone I S Hendrikse; Lu Su; Tim P Hogervorst; René P M Lafleur; Xianwen Lou; Gijsbert A van der Marel; Jeroen D C Codee; E W Meijer Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 15.419