| Literature DB >> 29528623 |
Ciqing Tong1, Tingxian Liu1, Victorio Saez Talens1, Willem E M Noteborn1, Thomas H Sharp2, Marco M R M Hendrix3, Ilja K Voets3, Christine L Mummery4, Valeria V Orlova4, Roxanne E Kieltyka1.
Abstract
Synthetic hydrogel materials can recapitulate the natural cell microenvironment; however, it is equally necessary that the gels maintain cell viability and phenotype while permitting reisolation without stress, especially for use in the stem cell field. Here, we describe a family of synthetically accessible, squaramide-based tripodal supramolecular monomers consisting of a flexible tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (TREN) core that self-assemble into supramolecular polymers and eventually into self-recovering hydrogels. Spectroscopic measurements revealed that monomer aggregation is mainly driven by a combination of hydrogen bonding and hydrophobicity. The self-recovering hydrogels were used to encapsulate NIH 3T3 fibroblasts as well as human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and their derivatives in 3D. The materials reported here proved cytocompatible for these cell types with maintenance of hiPSCs in their undifferentiated state essential for their subsequent expansion or differentiation into a given cell type and potential for facile release by dilution due to their supramolecular nature.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29528623 PMCID: PMC5894061 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b01614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomacromolecules ISSN: 1525-7797 Impact factor: 6.988
Figure 1(A) Tripodal squaramide-based monomers 1–4 with varied alkyl chain lengths (n = 6, 8, 10, 12). (B) Gel inversion test of squaramide-based materials above the CGC of 2 (5.6 mM) and 3 (3.1 mM) in deionized water. (C) Supramolecular hydrogel preparation and 3D cell seeding strategy.
Figure 2Oscillatory rheology measurements of hydrogel 3 (3.1 mM) in PBS (pH 7.4) at 37 °C: (A) Amplitude sweep (f = 1 Hz). (B) Frequency sweep (γ = 0.05%). (C) Step strain measurements (f = 1 Hz); the absence of data before the application of high strain is due to the acquisition of a frequency sweep (f = 0.01 to 2 Hz, γ = 0.05%). (D) Cryo-TEM image of hydrogel 3 (3.1 mM). Insert: Histograms of fiber width distribution for a sample size of N = 50. (E) Cryo-electron tomography image image of a hydrogel of 3 (3.1 mM). Scale bar: 200 nm. (F) Small-angle X-ray scattering profiles of fibers 3 collected at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. Black dots represent experimental data; red line represents fit with a form factor for flexible cylinders.
Figure 3(A) UV–Vis spectra of 1–3 in deionized water (1.5 × 10–5 M). (B) Fluorescence spectra of solutions of Nile Red (1.0 × 10–6 M, ex. 550 nm, em. 560–750 nm) in deionized water and in the presence of 1–3 (1.5 × 10–5 M). (C) FTIR spectra of 1–3 in the solid state (samples lyophilized from deionized water (3.1 mM), arrows highlight peaks considered).
Figure 43D cell culture of hiPSCs in hydrogel 3 (3.1 mM): Representative images at ∼24 (A) and ∼72 h (B). Dead cells were detected using the NucGreen Dead reagent. Scale bar: 100 μm. (C) Distribution of spheroid diameters in a hydrogel of 3 (3.1 mM) after 24, 48, and 72 h; ∼135 spheroids per day were measured. (D) FACS analysis of single cells of hiPSCs cultured under standard conditions on a vitronectin surface in 2D (left control, middle with TRA-1-60 and SSEA-4 antibodies) or after retrieval from hydrogel 3 (3.1 mM) after 24 h of culture (right with TRA-1-60 and SSEA-4 antibodies). Upper panels: side scatter (SSC-A) and forward scatter (FSC-A) showing live cell population (black circles are the gated live cells); expression levels of TRA-1-60 (middle panels) and SSEA-4 (lower panels) pluripotent stem cell markers of the gated live cells.