Literature DB >> 35403233

Development of the Veterans Crisis Line Caring Letters Suicide Prevention Intervention.

Mark A Reger1,2, Mary Grace Lauver3, Caitlin Manchester1, Traci H Abraham4,5, Sara J Landes5,6,7, Melissa M Garrido8,9, Cameron Griffin10, Jack A Woods4, Kiersten L Strombotne8,9, Gregory Hughes3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design, implementation, and plans to evaluate the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) Caring Letters intervention. DATA SOURCES: Veterans with VCL contact and VHA service utilization. STUDY
DESIGN: Caring Letters is an evidence-based post-acute care suicide prevention intervention in which brief messages are mailed to individuals at high risk of suicide repeatedly over time to communicate that people care about them and are concerned for their well-being. An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial using the RE-AIM evaluation framework is underway to examine the use of Caring Letters with veterans who contact the VCL. A team of suicide prevention subject matter experts, researchers, and operational partners from the VCL will evaluate the effects of Caring Letters on clinical outcomes and Department of Veterans Affairs - Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinical utilization rates and examine facilitators and barriers to implementing the Caring Letters campaign. DATA COLLECTION
METHODS: Veterans who contact the VCL are linked with national administrative VHA data. Semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a qualitative formative evaluation. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: In the first 12 months of the intervention, Caring Letters have been sent to over 100,000 veterans with VCL contact (over 500,000 letters mailed). A formative qualitative evaluation early in implementation revealed a variety of positive veteran perspectives on the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Partnered program design and evaluation with a high level of stakeholder engagement and participant feedback can result in a rigorous and feasible evaluation plan that improves implementation processes and produces actionable results. The initial results of this evaluation will be used to better inform care in the VHA and, specifically, the VCL.
© 2022 Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VA Health Care System; program evaluation; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35403233      PMCID: PMC9108218          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.734


  24 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Curran; Mark Bauer; Brian Mittman; Jeffrey M Pyne; Cheryl Stetler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

4.  Postcards in Persia: A Twelve to Twenty-four Month Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial for Hospital-Treated Deliberate Self-Poisoning.

Authors:  Hossein Hassanian-Moghaddam; Saeedeh Sarjami; Ali-Asghar Kolahi; Terry Lewin; Gregory Carter
Journal:  Arch Suicide Res       Date:  2015-03-16

5.  Suicide mortality and related behavior following calls to the Veterans Crisis Line by Veterans Health Administration patients.

Authors:  Claire M Hannemann; Ira R Katz; Megan E McCarthy; Gregory J Hughes; Richard McKeon; John F McCarthy
Journal:  Suicide Life Threat Behav       Date:  2020-12-29

6.  Postcards from the EDge: 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial for hospital-treated self-poisoning.

Authors:  Gregory L Carter; Kerrie Clover; Ian M Whyte; Andrew H Dawson; Catherine D'Este
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.319

7.  Can receipt of a regular postcard reduce suicide-related behaviour in young help seekers? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jo Robinson; Hok Pan Yuen; Sara Gook; Alison Hughes; Elizabeth Cosgrave; Eoin Killackey; Kathryn Baker; Anthony Jorm; Patrick McGorry; Alison Yung
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.732

8.  Postcards from the EDge project: randomised controlled trial of an intervention using postcards to reduce repetition of hospital treated deliberate self poisoning.

Authors:  Gregory L Carter; Kerrie Clover; Ian M Whyte; Andrew H Dawson; Catherine D'Este
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-23

9.  Mortality in the United States, 2019.

Authors:  Kenneth D Kochanek; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Arias
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2020-12

Review 10.  Can postdischarge follow-up contacts prevent suicide and suicidal behavior? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  David D Luxton; Jennifer D June; Katherine Anne Comtois
Journal:  Crisis       Date:  2013-01-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Development of the Veterans Crisis Line Caring Letters Suicide Prevention Intervention.

Authors:  Mark A Reger; Mary Grace Lauver; Caitlin Manchester; Traci H Abraham; Sara J Landes; Melissa M Garrido; Cameron Griffin; Jack A Woods; Kiersten L Strombotne; Gregory Hughes
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.734

2.  Translating research into policy and action.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Melissa M Garrido; Arleen F Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.734

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.