Literature DB >> 35400795

Post-survey Likert constructions: an adaptive method for generalizing perceptions of environmental variability.

Kalli F Doubleday1, Kelley A Crews1, Amelia C Eisenhart1, Kenneth R Young1.   

Abstract

Environmental perceptions are inherently based on an individual's existing knowledge, experiences, and future expectations. Methods for measuring environmental perception, therefore, must capture a range of experiences while also being flexible enough to integrate these experiences into a coherent unit for analysis. Many research topics require cross-cultural comparisons in order to corroborate findings; however, assessments of environmental perception are often place- and context-specific. We propose here post-survey Likert constructions (PSLCs), using semi-structured interviews to construct a five-point scale system from multiple household responses after the completion of interviews. This method is able to capture the natural variability in the population using the respondents' own language and characterizations of phenomena. We applied this method to measure the perceived environmental variability of residents living in a dynamic flooding landscape in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. The PSLC method captures the differences in environmental perception in a location with different settlement and cultural histories, multiple language groups, and different environmental conditions. The method easily transfers to other environments and populations, allowing for potential cross-cultural comparisons of perceived environmental variability. This publication responds to calls for increased transparency in reporting the development, execution, advantages, and disadvantages of methods related to environmental change.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive methodology; Climate change; Environmental perception; Environmental variability

Year:  2020        PMID: 35400795      PMCID: PMC8992389          DOI: 10.1007/s10708-020-10251-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  GeoJournal        ISSN: 0343-2521


  12 in total

1.  What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.

Authors:  Steven J Heine; Darrin R Lehman; Kaiping Peng; Joe Greenholtz
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-06

2.  Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale.

Authors:  Jerry W Lee; Patricia S Jones; Yoshimitsu Mineyama; Xinwei Esther Zhang
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Risk and climate change: perceptions of key policy actors in Canada.

Authors:  Richard C Stedman; Debra J Davidson; Adam Wellstead
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous?

Authors:  Anthony A Leiserowitz
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales.

Authors:  James Carifio; Rocco Perla
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Farmers' perceptions of climate change and agricultural adaptation strategies in rural Sahel.

Authors:  Ole Mertz; Cheikh Mbow; Anette Reenberg; Awa Diouf
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities.

Authors:  Wade E Martin; Ingrid M Martin; Brian Kent
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.789

8.  Public Perception of Uncertainties Within Climate Change Science.

Authors:  Vivianne H M Visschers
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Is climate change a threat for water uses in the Mediterranean region? Results from a survey at local scale.

Authors:  I La Jeunesse; C Cirelli; D Aubin; C Larrue; H Sellami; S Afifi; A Bellin; S Benabdallah; D N Bird; R Deidda; M Dettori; G Engin; F Herrmann; R Ludwig; B Mabrouk; B Majone; C Paniconi; A Soddu
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  The effect of reading ability and response formats on patients' abilities to respond to a patient satisfaction scale.

Authors:  S A Williams; M S Swanson
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.224

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.