Literature DB >> 12124723

Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale.

Jerry W Lee1, Patricia S Jones, Yoshimitsu Mineyama, Xinwei Esther Zhang.   

Abstract

Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale were examined. Self-identified Chinese, Japanese, and Americans (N=136, 323, and 160, respectively) recruited at ethnic or general supermarkets in Southern California completed a 13-question Sense of Coherence scale with a choice of either four, five, or seven responses in either Chinese, Japanese, or English. The Japanese respondents more frequently reported difficulty with the scale, the Chinese more frequently skipped questions, and both these groups selected the midpoint more frequently on items that involved admitting to a positive emotion than did the Americans, who were more likely to indicate a positive emotion. Construct validity of the scale tended to be better for the Chinese and the Americans when there were four response choices and for the Japanese when there were seven. Although culture affected response patterns, the association of sense of coherence and health was positive in all three cultural groups. Copyright 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12124723     DOI: 10.1002/nur.10041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  63 in total

1.  Factors that influence self-reported general health status among different Asian ethnic groups: evidence from the Roadmap to the New Horizon: Linking Asians to Improved Health and Wellness study.

Authors:  Siobhan C Maty; Holden Leung; Christine Lau; Gemma Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-06

2.  Coping resources as explanatory factors of stress reactions during missile attacks: comparing Jewish and Arab adolescents in Israel.

Authors:  Orna Braun-Lewensohn; Shifra Sagy
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2010-05-11

3.  Learning from failures of protocol in cross-cultural research.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Shirajum Munira; Khaleda Jesmin; Joseph Hackman; Leonid Tiokhin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Factors associated with hepatitis B testing among Cambodian American men and women.

Authors:  Victoria M Taylor; Roshan Bastani; Nancy Burke; Jocelyn Talbot; Channdara Sos; Qi Liu; J Carey Jackson; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-02

Review 5.  Validity of Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monica Eriksson; Bengt Lindström
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Cultural adaptation in translational research: field experiences.

Authors:  Jessy G Dévieux; Robert M Malow; Rhonda Rosenberg; Michèle Jean-Gilles; Deanne Samuels; Emma Ergon-Pérez; Robin Jacobs
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30.

Authors:  N W Scott; P M Fayers; N K Aaronson; A Bottomley; A de Graeff; M Groenvold; M Koller; M A Petersen; M A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Is there an Asian idiom of distress? Somatic symptoms in female Japanese and Korean students.

Authors:  Denise Saint Arnault; Oksoo Kim
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.218

9.  Assessment of Safe Sleep: Validation of the Parent Newborn Sleep Safety Survey.

Authors:  Leanne Whiteside-Mansell; Rosemary Nabaweesi; Alison Rose Caballero; Samantha Hope Mullins; Beverly Kaye Miller; Mary Elizabeth Aitken
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.145

10.  The Epworth score in African American populations.

Authors:  Amanda L Hayes; James C Spilsbury; Sanjay R Patel
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.