Literature DB >> 3539256

Influence of intraperitoneal drains on subhepatic collections following cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical trial.

J R Monson, J MacFie, H Irving, F B Keane, T G Brennan, W A Tanner.   

Abstract

In this prospective randomized study, the influence of an intraperitoneal drain on the incidence and clinical significance of subhepatic collections occurring in patients after acute or elective cholecystectomy was assessed by ultrasound examination. A total of 112 patients entered the study, of whom 54 received a drain. There was no significant difference between the drainage and the non-drainage groups with respect to mean age or sex distribution, the number of patients in whom the gallbladder bed was formally closed (27 versus 21) nor in the number of acute cholecystectomies performed in either group (12 versus 13). Ultrasound detected 10 (18 per cent) collections in the drainage group and only one (1.8 per cent) in the non-drainage group (P less than 0.01, chi 2 test). None of the collections required any further treatment and no morbidity occurred that was directly attributable to the presence of the retained fluid. These results suggest that rather than preventing fluid collections, suction drains may predispose to the development of subhepatic collections after cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3539256     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800731215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  A multi-disciplinary review of the potential association between closed-suction drains and surgical site infection.

Authors:  Alyssa J Reiffel; Philip S Barie; Jason A Spector
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.150

2.  The effectiveness and appropriate management of abdominal drains in patients undergoing elective liver resection: a retrospective analysis and prospective case series.

Authors:  Kuniya Tanaka; Takafumi Kumamoto; Kazunori Nojiri; Kazuhisa Takeda; Itaru Endo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection.

Authors:  K C Conlon; D Labow; D Leung; A Smith; W Jarnagin; D G Coit; N Merchant; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage. Results of a prospective study in 61 patients.

Authors:  D Franco; A Karaa; J L Meakins; G Borgonovo; C Smadja; D Grange
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Early experiences of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in five Irish hospitals. Irish Laparoscopic Group.

Authors:  A L Leahy; D B Bouchier-Hayes; J M Hyland; P V Delaney; G O'Sullivan; F B Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Cholecystectomy and drainage: ultrasonographic and radioisotopic evaluation.

Authors:  V K Kapoor; M Ibrarullah; S S Baijal; A Kulshreshtha; B R Mittal; R Saxena; B K Das; S P Kaushik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Zhang; Chun-Lin Zhao; Jing Xie; Yan-Wei Ye; Jun-Feng Sun; Zhao-Hui Ding; Hua-Nan Xu; Li Ding
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

9.  Cholecystectomy: safe or not safe to drain?

Authors:  S G Mellor; M H Thomas; B S Donnellan
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 18.000

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.